You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
'Anti-Islamic rhetoric helps radicalisation'
2005-02-11
You see, if we didn't critize them, they wouldn't get so angry.
The radicalisation of young Muslims is partly caused by the negative way Islam is being talked about in the Netherlands, the head of the security service AIVD has claimed.
Ask yourself if it would be talked about in a negative way if it wasn't radicalized...
Sybrand van Hulst made the suggestion during an interview with television current affairs programme Zembla on Wednesday night. Van Hulst's organisation is leading the investigation into the activities of extremists in the Netherlands and is deeply involved in the arrest and trial of 12 young Muslims said to be part of a terrorist network called the Hofstadgroep. But he did not specify who he was referring too as being partly responsible for driving some young Muslims towards radicalism.
Nobody we've heard of, we're sure...
MPs Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Geert Wilders have led the criticism against aspects of Islam and the Muslim community in the Netherlands in recent years. Both have received death threats. Filmmaker Theo van Gogh, another vocal critic of Islam, was murdered in Amsterdam on 2 November last year. Mohammed B., 26, who was arrested for the murder, was said to be on the edge of the Hofstadgroep. Van Gogh had recently collaborated with Hirsi Ali to make the short film "Submission" which criticised violence against women in Islamic communities. Submission featured female actors who were wearing see-through veils. Their breasts were visible, something that caused a lot of offence among Muslims, many of whom who were already offended by the film's accusations.
Therefore they were fully justified in killing him, right? And I'm really, really offended by the remarks in Friday sermons, so I'd be fully justified in bumping off any mosque preachers I might run across, right? That's the entire basis of civilized society, right?
Van Hulst estimated that there are about 1,000 "radical Muslims" in the Netherlands. Of these, a few dozen are prepared to use violence. He said one way to help counter the radicalisation of young Muslims was to make them feel welcome in the Netherlands, in order that they would see themselves as being Dutch.
If they're going to do that, I guess they're going to have to come to love titties, aren't they? Or should the Dutch change to accomodate them?

Wotta dumbass.
Posted by:tipper [http://armedstruggle.blogspot.com/]

#4  You see, if we didn’t critize them, they wouldn’t get so angry.

I think it's a problem for these people that the majority of Americans find that snide remark as funny as I did. ROFL.
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-11 6:23:46 PM  

#3  That little Dutch boy should pull out his little finger from the dyke (dam, not lesbian!). Holland is almost beyond rescue.

Or maybe Hulst hopes he would go last.
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-02-11 9:54:05 AM  

#2  New Dutch welcome wagon for muslim immigrants:
Koran
The Complete works of Sayyid Qutb
Choice of burkha/chador (sunni/shiite) in latest Paris fashion colors
Do's and Don'ts: The proper treatment of dhimmis, by Tamerlane
Pistol, beheading knife, and stationary for those times you want your message to be heard.
Posted by: ed   2005-02-11 9:23:26 AM  

#1  Another way to help counter radicalisation would be to ship the youths to the Rub Al Khali. Somehow "Dutch" and "Muslim" together in the same sentence seem to be a logical contradiction.
Posted by: HV   2005-02-11 9:16:26 AM  

00:00