You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
American Defeatists and Democracy -- Not a Good Mix
2005-02-11
Many years after the Vietnam War, General Vo Nguyen Giap, the North Vietnamese military commander, wrote, "if it were not for the disunity created by
stateside protest, Hanoi would have ultimately surrendered." Former North Vietnamese Colonel Bui Tin explained, "Through dissent and protest [America] lost the ability to mobilize a will to win." With the help of certain journalists who couldn't tell the difference between victory and defeat on the battlefield, the communists prevailed. While antiwar activists were spitting in the face of our returning troops, the people of South Vietnam were being slaughtered by the thousands.

Militant Islamists understand recent American history, and they understand that the only way to defeat America is to turn her against herself. Although President Bush handily won reelection, the defeatists have decided to continue their apoplectic campaign. Formerly known as liberals or progressives, the defeatists apparently prefer the status quo of despotic power over the prospect of liberty.

On the eve of Iraq's first democratic election since the fall of Saddam Hussein, Senator Edward Kennedy stated, "We must recognize what a large and growing number of Iraqis now believe. The war in Iraq has become a war against the American occupation.
The U.S. military presence has become part of the problem, not part of the solution." Not to be outdone by the senator, Rep. Lynn Woosley (D-CA) sponsored a resolution in the House of Representatives calling for the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Although this pathetic piece of legislation will never see the light of day, the timing was remarkable, as millions of Iraqis risked life and limb to participate in voting, a watershed moment in history. It's a right that Woosley and other liberal lemmings have taken for granted since birth. The ever-prescient Woosley explained to those of us less familiar with warfare tactics that, "The insurgency will slow down as soon as they don't have the U.S. military as their target." But leaving Iraq now would assuredly create a power vacuum, and some dangerous people would be willing to fill it. Iraq's interim President Ghazi al-Yawar doesn't seem to agree with the American defeatists, stating that it would be "complete nonsense for them to leave in this chaos." Premature military withdrawal would embolden terrorists around the world because America would be seen as weak. Somewhere, General Giap is smiling.
Posted by:tipper

#5  Ebbavith, you are talking about the Easter Offensive in which South Vietnam (with US air support whooped ass). My point is it could have been won long before that at an easier cost if we didn't chop out the leges beneath the political side of things.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-02-11 12:12:39 PM  

#4  Let's not forget the nearly 3 million Cambodian, Vietnamese, and Loatian dead after congress cut off military aid. Thanks John Kerry and fellow travelers.
Posted by: ed   2005-02-11 12:06:48 PM  

#3  We pretty much won the military conflict. The Vietnamese were able to turn away a N.Vietnamese invasion shortly after we had pulled the vast bulk of our troops out. Air support and some combat teams were reinserted to help, but the bulk of the fighting was done by RVN forces. Then the Democrats in Congress cut any sigificant funding to the S.Vietnamese government, severing their resupply. The next invasion, in direct violation of the Paris Treaty, was successful thanks to Bela Abzug D-NY and company.
Posted by: Ebbavith Gleack2775   2005-02-11 11:57:38 AM  

#2  Vietnam was pretty much lost when Kennedy supported the coup that removed Diem and thus cost us the support of the majority of the population of South Vietnam in 1963 and made it very easy to spin us as imperialists taking power.

Yeah we still could have won after that point, but it was a serious up hill battle.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-02-11 11:13:53 AM  

#1  I dunno, it seems to me that the one big factor that did in the Vietnam War was LBJ's unwillingness to use whatever force was necessary to win, resulting in a drawn out conflict. Take too long a time to do something, and people WILL begin to question the wisdom of the task.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-02-11 10:47:51 AM  

00:00