You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Rejects European Demand to Give Up Nuclear Reactor That Can Supply Weapons-Grade Material
2005-02-13
Iran rejected a European demand to stop building a heavy-water nuclear reactor that provides a simpler way of extracting weapons-grade fuel, and it warned the United States on Sunday "not to play with fire" by repeatedly threatening Tehran. Iran has indicated previously it will keep its heavy-water reactor, but Sunday's announcement that it will not replace it with a light-water reactor was the clearest statement yet of its nuclear plans and represented a hardening of its position. Both plants in question can be used to enrich uranium, a critical part in nuclear programs, but the extraction of weapons-grade material from a light-water reactor is more difficult. Uranium enriched to low grades is used for fuel in nuclear reactors, but further enrichment makes it suitable for atomic bombs.

The statement underscored the unresolved differences between Iranian and European negotiators, who are continuing their talks over Iran's nuclear program even as the United States escalates its criticism of Iran. Earlier this month, President Bush accused Iran in his State of the Union speech of being "the world's primary state sponsor of terror" and pursuing nuclear weapons. Although Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said a military strike against Iran was "simply not on the agenda at this point," Bush has said his administration would not rule out any option. On Sunday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi reiterated previous statements by top officials that Iran would not tolerate any acts of aggression, particularly from the United States. "Rice and other U.S. officials are aware of Iran's capabilities." Asefi told reporters at a news briefing. "During the talks with the Europeans, we told them in clear terms to tell their American allies not to play with fire, and the Europeans clearly got our message." Iranian President Mohammad Khatami last week warned that Iran would turn into a "scorching hell" for any possible attackers...
Precognition?
Posted by:Anonymoose

#5  The US may go to the UNSC for the hell of it to see if it will be Saddam Redux 2005.

That would be a waste of time and effort. There's no question it would be.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-02-13 11:46:28 PM  

#4  4.75 When the UNSC chokes, the U. S. Congress cuts financial support of the U. N. to zip.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-13 10:18:39 PM  

#3  The scenario:
1 Iran will reject the EU demands.
2. The EU will counter with additional requests and suggestions, but not realy Demands, per se.
3. The MMs will continue to play Mindf**k with the EUs as they continue this negotiation charade.
4. THe MMs will continue with their plan, which involves getting Bushehr on line to produce plutonium for a bomb that will mount on a missle, and will continue U235 enrichment program for a Uranium bomb.
4.5 The US may go to the UNSC for the hell of it to see if it will be Saddam Redux 2005.
5. The US will keep on clando ops and intel gathering for war plans. This will keep the MMs looking over their shoulders.

That is how I see it.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-13 9:54:04 PM  

#2  Iran rejected a European demand to stop building a heavy-water nuclear reactor that provides a simpler way of extracting weapons-grade fuel,..

Just to clarify, this is latest European demand that was rejected. There will be more demands, and quite likely, more rejections.

..and it warned the United States on Sunday "not to play with fire" by repeatedly threatening Tehran.

Boys, you have no idea what fire is. Care to ask Japan about it?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-02-13 9:32:14 PM  

#1  hey MM's, tough thing about reactors is you can't move em around - they have static GPS coords
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-13 9:04:32 PM  

00:00