You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Legal Beagles: Charles and Camilla wedding 'could be illegal'
2005-02-14
Prince Charles could be barred from marrying Camilla in a civil ceremony, legal experts have warned. Plans have been drawn up for the couple to marry in a low-key ceremony at Windsor Castle, followed by a chapel blessing. But in a BBC Panorama television special last night, family law experts said there were "serious doubts" over the couple's wedding plans, arguing that the 1836 Marriage Act barred the royal family from civil marriages.

"I was very surprised when I heard this was proposed," said Stephen Cretney, Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. "The legislation which governs civil marriage in England is expressed not to apply to members of the royal family. "There is no statutory procedure whereby members of the royal family can marry in a register office."

Were the couple to wed under current legislation, Dr Cretney said the Prince of Wales would not be legally married and Camilla would not be his wife. "This would be a very, very serious matter," he said.

Valentine Le Grice QC, a specialist in family law, said a "heavy question mark" hung over the proposed marriage. "It would not be possible for them to get married in the way most people understand a register office marriage," he said. "It is not open to the two of them to follow the normal procedures of a registry marriage."

Clarence House said it had taken advice from four independent legal experts and said there was nothing in law which would prevent Charles and Camilla getting married.

The warnings came as it was revealed today that Camilla could still become Queen if public opinion swings in her favour. Mrs Parker Bowles will be the first Princess Consort, reflecting the huge public opposition to her becoming Queen. But senior courtiers admitted that they had deliberately left the possibility of her becoming Queen open if there is a change in the public mood. "When the time comes, which we hope is a long way off, an option would be to reflect the mood in the country at that time," a senior aide to the Prince of Wales told The Times.

Yesterday Charles and Camilla attended a church service near the Prince's Highgrove home, joining a congregation of 34 people in St Lawrence's Church in Didmarton, Gloucestershire. They appeared not to have decided how to spend St Valentine's Day today. Asked if they had any plans, Mrs Parker Bowles said: "Not as yet." The Rev Christopher Mulholland said there was a great sense of goodwill in the church as Charles and Camilla took their seats. "I prayed for their happiness," he said.
Some things just boggle. Leave them alone, for crying out loud. They've been bonkers for each other for 30 years.
Posted by:.com

#13  This is so fscking interesting that I lost my words for the surge of excitement about the topic.

WWCD?
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-02-14 9:33:04 PM  

#12  Um? Royals are not citizens? If citizens can marry in a civil marriage then they can. OED
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-02-14 9:13:31 PM  

#11  Still applies, AFAIA. That would be another rice paper obstacle though, if it arose.
Posted by: Bulldog   2005-02-14 7:35:14 PM  

#10  Another thing: For some reason I thought she was Catholic. Guess not.

(Bulldog or Tony - am I correct that the monarch of England still can't marry a Catholic? Or has that changed, too?)
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-02-14 5:55:13 PM  

#9  
Were the couple to wed under current legislation, Dr Cretney said the Prince of Wales would not be legally married and Camilla would not be his wife.
And this would be different from the way it is now how, exactly?

They'll just go from shacking up to shacking up with a wedding band.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-02-14 5:51:56 PM  

#8  And anyway, it's "unlawful", illegal being a sick bird...
Posted by: mojo   2005-02-14 1:13:44 PM  

#7  And I thought that the medieval(sp?) royal line was a soap opera!
Posted by: Korora   2005-02-14 12:31:45 PM  

#6  Maybe Charles can abdicate the throne he may never get and then he can get married to Camilla, and become the governor of Bermuda...or something like that.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-14 10:42:24 AM  

#5  I wonder if it's fun being a human tourist attraction? I know it pays good...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-02-14 10:42:21 AM  

#4  You knew somebody in this situation was going to say "Neigh!"
Posted by: BH   2005-02-14 10:38:11 AM  

#3  "Will no one rid me of this troublesome QC?"
Posted by: mojo   2005-02-14 10:35:41 AM  

#2  Were the couple to wed under current legislation, Dr Cretney said the Prince of Wales would not be legally married and Camilla would not be his wife. "This would be a very, very serious matter," he said.

Funny, I thought it was the current situation.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-14 8:13:34 AM  

#1  They’ve been bonkers for each other for 30 years.

And they've been bonking each other for at least that long, too. ;)

I think the law will be changed to allow the marriage, without much fuss. This sounds like a typical contemporary Panorama fluff-piece. It used to be a programme worth watching, you know.
Posted by: Bulldog   2005-02-14 6:49:08 AM  

00:00