You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: North
NYT: In Munich, Senator Clinton Urges NATO Role in Sudan Conflict
2005-02-14
The NYT's Clinton 2008 push begins... Consider this a love note passed in class.
The annual Munich Conference on Security Policy brings together the toughest national security crowd in the Western world, and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton played it safe and cool here on Sunday. In her first appearance before the clubby - and overwhelmingly male - gathering of experts, Mrs. Clinton, the junior senator from New York, showered praise on the United Nations as she called on it to reform and uttered only the most indirect rebuke of the Bush administration. In her strongest plea, she advocated a direct NATO role to stop the killing in the Darfur region of Sudan - including logistical, communication and transportation support. "We cannot continue to say 'Never again' as it happens again before our eyes," she said, although the flatness of her delivery robbed her words of their potential impact.

Mrs. Clinton smiled and evoked chuckles when she thanked Secretary General Kofi Annan "for giving my husband a new job" as the United Nations' special envoy for countries affected by the tsunami crisis.

She was welcomed - even praised - by the audience. Antje Vollmer, vice president of the German Parliament, and one of the few women at the conference, told Mrs. Clinton that "personally, politically and intellectually, it was a great pleasure to listen to you." Miomir Zuzul, the foreign minister of Croatia, thanked her for her "excellent" speech.

The speech was a collaborative effort. Mrs. Clinton sought input from a number of Americans in the forum, among others Richard C. Holbrooke, who served as her husband's ambassador to the United Nations and to Germany; Samuel R. Berger, her husband's national security adviser; Jeffrey H. Smith, the former general counsel at the C.I.A. when her husband was president; and Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser for the first President Bush.

Mrs. Clinton, who supported the invasion of Iraq, referred to the "diplomatic train wreck" in the United Nations Security Council in 2003 that failed to forge consensus on the American-led war and split apart the trans-Atlantic alliance, without saying who was to blame. She said the Bush administration and "its conservative allies" were wrong to denounce the United Nations "in violent terms," since the decisions to deny authority for military action in Iraq were made by the member countries.

In the question-and-answer period, she made clear that she was by no means suggesting that NATO expand "meaninglessly" in the world, but added that there were a number of areas where NATO intervention in pursuit of a United Nations mandate made sense. She urged closer cooperation between NATO and Russia, whose military, she noted, had played an important and timely role in the tsunami relief effort.

Mrs. Clinton even mentioned that creative cooperation of NATO with countries like Russia and China and with regional organizations be put on the conference's agenda next year, suggesting she might become a regular fixture here, much the way a number of her fellow senators on the Armed Services Committee have become over the years.

At the conference's gala dinner on Saturday night, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, singled out Mrs. Clinton for praise. He noted that Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, was absent from the conference last year "because he was pursuing a failed presidential campaign." Mr. McCain, who flirted with a presidential bid himself, suggested that Mrs. Clinton might be next, joking that he and Senator Lieberman "are fellow losers, but this year Senator Clinton is here to keep hope alive."

The conference's guest of honor was Mr. Annan, who urged NATO and the European Union to increase efforts to end the Darfur crisis. "Those organizations with real capacity - and NATO as well as the E.U. are well represented in this room - must give serious consideration to what, in practical terms, they can do to end this tragedy," Mr. Annan said. "Additional measures are urgently required."
...
The Game is afoot - and McCain just can't help himself, again.
Posted by:.com

#15  if McCain, Lieberman and Hillary would dump their parties and start over again in the center, theyd be onto something.

Yes, and if they brought the tooth fairy on board, the country could simultaneously wipe out the deficit, give earned income tax credit to everyone making less than 40K a year, and provide each citizen with a dozen clones.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-02-14 8:56:40 PM  

#14  Hey, Ship! Whew! Glad you're here. I've been channeling you, sorta, and I'm not doing too good a job. So, now that you're here, You can be you, and you'll do a much better job, almost as good as if you were um, er, doing it. K?
Posted by: .com   2005-02-14 5:06:49 PM  

#13  I hate it when the game's afoot. I prefer a torso for it's lasting power.

/Afghans everywhere
Posted by: Shipman   2005-02-14 4:45:50 PM  

#12  Lol, TGA. I can't imagine why?! To miss out on such Grateness!

You're a better man than me - I just wouldn't go to those sort of affairs, which would have gotten me canned for attitude long before I was invited to those sort of affairs. Y'see, if I travelled back in time and was who I am, then now I'd be screwed. And if I killed my grandfather, then I'd see my shadow and there'd be 6 more weeks of winter. Yeah, that's it. So don't throw me in the briar patch with the silly American politicians, K? ;-)
Posted by: .com   2005-02-14 4:33:24 PM  

#11  Sure, LH. HIllary is a centrist. Riiiiiight.

Nothing is being done in Darfur because of French and Chinese business (read oil) interests. Kofi is irrelevant in this situation. He could, of course, thump the table and cast aspersions at these two Security Council members to try and get them to change their positions, but he does not have the balls to do this. That is his failing, but it would likely be repeated by anyone in his position. Ain't no one in power going to stick their neck out for a bunch of farmers in the middle-o-nowhere.
Posted by: Remoteman   2005-02-14 4:24:02 PM  

#10  if McCain, Lieberman and Hillary would dump their parties and start over again in the center, theyd be onto something.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2005-02-14 4:09:07 PM  

#9  At the conference’s gala dinner on Saturday night, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, singled out Mrs. Clinton for praise. He noted that Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, was absent from the conference last year "because he was pursuing a failed presidential campaign." Mr. McCain, who flirted with a presidential bid himself, suggested that Mrs. Clinton might be next, joking that he and Senator Lieberman "are fellow losers, but this year Senator Clinton is here to keep hope alive."

Tells you just how much McCain's ego was hurt by losing to Bush. And it should tell Republicans just where he stands.
Posted by: true nuff   2005-02-14 12:38:36 PM  

#8  I left before Kofi was called up...
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-14 12:26:11 PM  

#7  The speech was a collaborative effort. Mrs. Clinton sought input from a number of Americans in the forum, among others Richard C. Holbrooke, who served as her husband’s ambassador to the United Nations and to Germany; Samuel R. Berger, her husband’s national security adviser; Jeffrey H. Smith, the former general counsel at the C.I.A. when her husband was president; and Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser for the first President Bush

Sandy Burglar? Mr. I Stuff Top Secret Documents From The National Archives Into My Pants??? And isn't Jeff Smith the counsel responsible for convincing Clinton to discontinue the raid to kill/capture bin Laden?

Go ahead Hillary, surround yourself with this little loser clique....it's sure to raise your popularity among the Average American.
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-14 10:36:04 AM  

#6  Thanks for ruining my belated breakfast, tu...
Posted by: Raj   2005-02-14 10:31:34 AM  

#5  Lol, tu! Now that's a visual!
Posted by: .com   2005-02-14 10:29:39 AM  

#4  If she really wants to do something to help solve the situation, send her over to the Sudan and have her crush Epaulet Man's skull between her massive thighs...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-02-14 10:21:55 AM  

#3  The only thing that could have salvaged this slime-fest would have been for everyone there to have developed simultaneous and noisy explosive diarrhea and trombone vomiting, culminating in a methane implosion.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-02-14 10:05:35 AM  

#2  "Those organizations with real capacity - and NATO as well as the E.U. are well represented in this room - must give serious consideration to what, in practical terms, they can do to end this tragedy," Mr. Annan said. "Additional measures are urgently required."

Why doesn't the U. N, do something, Kofi? Lack of leadership? or French business interests? How did it get to be a NATO problem? If the U. N. can't handle genocide, what can it handle?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-14 9:07:29 AM  

#1  The conference’s guest of honor was Mr. Annan, who urged NATO and the European Union to increase efforts to end the Darfur crisis.

Another orgy of mutual admiration and self aggrandisment. And overfed people buzzing around the trough. They may be concerned about the people in Darfur, but none of them have done Jack Sh*t for the people there except talk about it. Pretty disgusting group of people, IMHO.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-14 9:04:29 AM  

00:00