You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
'Sharon is war criminal', says Red Ken
2005-03-04
Ol' Red Eyes has been musing on his favourite subject again.
Ken Livingstone has reignited his dispute with Britain's Jewish leaders by launching a provocative attack on the "war criminal" Ariel Sharon. In a riposte to criticism from the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the London mayor accused Israel of "ethnic cleansing" and said its prime minister should be imprisoned. He also accused Israel of demonising Muslims.
Posted by:Bulldog

#9  Not removing him from the Labor party at a minimum is totally unacceptable. I don't give a damn about the UK's help in the WOT at this point. He can be removed from office by this board that is supposedly investigating him or whatever it's called. If he had said this about allenists he would be out already. If I was a "Jew" and in the UK I would be tossing Molotov cocktails in the street. This bastard doesn't deserve any slack at all. All he needs to do now to complete this farce is wip out his "Protocols of Zion" and tell us the Jews run everything and start talking about blood libel.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-03-04 1:57:31 PM  

#8  so how about a "quick and dirty" guide to the London political scene - how does Red Ken stay popular - my vague impression is that New Labour support on the ground is more of a North of England thing - non-Tories in London, other than Jews, lean more to the loonie variety of Labourite - is that right? Or is it the muslim vote?
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-03-04 1:29:33 PM  

#7  Didnt he win in London as in independent originally. They can toss him out to please us, and alienate the Left Wing of labour even more than it is, but they cant push him out of office.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-03-04 1:25:57 PM  

#6  Tony and Gordon Brown cant do anything about Red Ken in London

They could throw him out of the Labour party if they wanted to. Clearly, they don't.
Posted by: Bulldog   2005-03-04 11:40:48 AM  

#5  Tony may make missteps on the mideast, but he doesnt go around saying vile things like Red Ken does. For now theyre stuck with each other - the loonie left knows Labour needs Tony (or his like) to win, while Tony and Gordon Brown cant do anything about Red Ken in London.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-03-04 11:34:30 AM  

#4  Purdy good job SPoD!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-03-04 10:45:01 AM  

#3  trouble for Tony is, SPOD, Ken's kinda talk gets Cheri Blair all hot and moist
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-04 10:10:16 AM  

#2  SPD
Blair is as guilty as he is
Actually guiltier because does more damage. To wit.
J-m: London parley 'absolves' PA of fighting terror
Posted by: gromgorru   2005-03-04 9:52:22 AM  

#1  When will some Englishman put a Cricket Bat against this pricks head? He claims he isn't anti semitic then you read all the pure vile hate he has spoken against the state of Israel. He and the rest of the left whom love him are Jew haters. They would be Jew killers if given the chance. They all are guilty of antisemitism if they allow this man to speak his vile wicked language in their name. Blair is as guilty as he is. Blair could stop him in an instant. The antisemitic can't be trusted. Blair can't be trusted. The UK can't be trusted if it allows men like Livingstone to govern. Tolerating Livingstone is tolerating a terrorist suppoting jew hater.

I am no fan of Sharon but I know a Jew hater when I see or hear one.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-03-04 7:33:54 AM  

00:00