You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Losing Battle for Islamists
2005-03-26
All in all, an optimistic — and fairly realistic — assessment. I wonder at the significance of this being published in the Green Truth. Does this mean the princes have started to decipher what the handwriting means?
Amir Taheri
Where do we go from here? This is the question that Islamist groups are posing these days in the murky space they inhabit on the margins of reality. It is asked in mosques controlled by radicals, touched upon in articles published by fellow-travelers, and debated in the chat-rooms of websites operated by militant groups. Leaving aside the usual suggestions to hijack a few more passenger jets or to poison the drinking water of big cities in the West or to blow up this or that monument in Western capitals, the movement appears to have run out of ideas. It may even be passing through its deepest crisis of imagination since the 9/11 attacks against the United States.
That's because they're a one-trick pony. Running around with a turban and an AK, being willing to die for Allan, that's all very romantic for 19-year-olds. Controlling territory setting up a government actually winning friends and influencing people, that's a lot harder, and hard boyz aren't the tool to do it. The "political wing" of al-Qaeda — Hizb ut-Tahrir, al-Muhajiroun, the Pakistani Jamaats, the Chechen "government" — range from the outlandish to the ludicrous.
There are several reasons for this. To start with there is the fact that Al-Qaeda which operated as an efficient organ of command and control has been smashed into pieces. Of the top 20 leaders of the network only two, Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri, are believed to be still alive and free, albeit in hiding. But the two appear to have no regular organizational contact with Islamist cells anywhere in the world. Since December 2001 the two have managed to send a total of six authenticated messages from their hideouts. That the messages reached the outside world is mainly due to the fact that an Arab satellite television channel was prepared to broadcast them virtually unedited. Al-Qaeda, which published a total of 83 books and pamphlets in 2001, has managed to bring out only one book since 9/11, dealing with the war in Iraq.
"Decentralization" doesn't work as well as they thought it would, not even as well as we thought it was. They've become all tactics and no strategy, and they were light on strategy when they started. Otherwise they'd have spent another five years building their infrastructure before 9-11.
The difficulty of contacting Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri, generally referred to by the Islamists as "the sheikhs", was illustrated recently when Abu-Mussab Al-Zarqawi, the leader of the Al-Qaeda group in Iraq, tried to obtain a fatwa (edict) from them authorizing the mass murder of Iraqi Shiite women and children. It took Al-Zarqawi nearly six weeks to obtain the green light he wanted from Al-Zawahiri.
Everything has to be done through runners, and runners can be intercepted just like radio communications. When a runner's caught, the head cheeses have to find new quarters — or more usually, new intermediaries — for fear they'll sing. Tracing back the links is old-fashioned intel work. Now it's being coupled with newer-fashioned intel work like critical node analysis.
The disruption of Al-Qaeda's leadership has had other consequences. For the past year or so Al-Zawahiri has been urging militants from all over the world, including North America and Europe, to converge on the Middle East for a regional "jihad" in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Bin Laden, however, has been preaching a totally different strategy. He wants the jihadists, including "sleepers" in America and Europe, to carry out other "spectacular coups" inside the United States.
Thereby implying they're not colocated...
So far, however, both strategies have failed. There is no sign of the new fronts that Al-Zawahiri wanted to open in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia.
Afghanistan is becoming surprisingly pacified. The "Taliban" are pretty obviously now a Pak phenomenon, almost totally. The Paks are busy trying to bring down Perv, but he's put a large dent in the sectarian groups. He's also been reacting to pressure — and money — from us and cutting back his support to most, though not all, of the jihadi groups. Lashkar e-Taiba appears to be the only one he's intent on preserving.
At the same time Bin Laden's desperate pleas for doing "something big" inside the US have produced no results.
We've obviously been busy, despite the holes in our security that are so gleefully pointed to by the press. I also don't think Qaeda had a very effective organization in the country prior to 9-11 — probably a sizable proportion of them got jobs, got married, settled down, and forgot about the jihad thing as they aged out of the phase where young men consider themselves indestructible. The U.S. is a pretty comfortable place to live, and religion isn't the center of everything, like it is in Pakland or Arabia. No doubt some have remained true to the Cause, but looking at Allan worship as a way of life on one hand and bowling, business and babes on the other, probably the majority now own bowling balls, 7-11s, and Paris Hilton videos.
More importantly, the governments of the regional countries targeted have begun to fight back. In Pakistan more than 13,000 schools suspected of propagating extremist ideas have been shut in the past two years. In Yemen, the number of such schools to be shut is around 24,000. There are also signs that Afghan, Pakistani, Saudi, and Iraqi authorities have managed to infiltrate at least some terror groups.
That's something we haven't discussed yet, but it makes a lot of sense. Agent Starchedshirt of the FBI isn't going to do it, but Mahmoud and Ahmed can — and probably have. Probably not all of them have gone over to the other side, either.
Since 2003 hundreds of terrorists have been picked up in the countries concerned, in most cases thanks to tip-offs from repenting militants.
We've been rolling our eyes and mocking when the bad guyz "repent," but maybe we spoke too soon. On the other hand, Taheri's writing in Arab News, so maybe he's being polite. More evidence, please...
The Islamist websites, and sermons at mosques controlled by Al-Qaeda sympathizers in the West, are these days full of warning against the "munafeqin" (hypocrites) who join the movement to denounce its members, often in the hope of reward. In Pakistan alone the CIA is believed to be spending some $80 million a year on a network of informers that has provided information leading to dozens of arrests by Pakistani authorities. Earlier this month, the Russians managed to find and kill Aslan Maskhadov, the principal Chechen rebel leader, thanks to a tip-off that cost them $10 million. Pakistan, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia have also scored major successes in "turning-around" operations aimed at persuading the militants to repent and return to normal life. More than 1400 former militants have thus been "turned-around" in Yemen and Saudi Arabia, according to official estimates.
Hokay. The cockles of my heart are now toasty warm...
While thus hemorrhaging, the Islamist movement is also finding it increasingly difficult to attract recruits, especially within the Muslim world. But even in Western Europe, where Muslim communities still represent fertile ground for recruits, the number of "volunteers", having reached a peak in the autumn of 2003, has been falling since.
Not seeing an awful lot of results, were they? And maybe had a few guys come back that didn't get the 72 virgins but did lose a few inconvenient body parts? 72 virgins is something to strive for; a colostomy bag isn't quite the same.
One big problem is that the number of places where Islamists could hide in safety is dwindling. According to regional intelligence sources, the terror networks cannot hide more than a few dozen people in the remote areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan at any given time. Gone are the days when Bin Laden and his cohorts ruled over mini-emirates of their own in the Hindukush and Waziristan with their several wives, numerous children and extended entourage. Today, the only place between the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean where the FBI is not present is the Islamic Republic of Iran where the trail of Al-Qaeda goes cold. But even then the Islamic Republic can never be regarded as a permanent safe haven for Bin Ladenists whose aims include the killing of as many Shiites as possible.
That's a purely tactical alliance, but the ayatollahs are going hang onto it as long as they can. Not an awful lot of strategy there, either...
For the first time in two decades, the Islamist movement is also beginning to face fund-raising difficulties. The generous donations that indirectly came from various regional countries have stopped while scores of bank accounts operated by the militants have been frozen. A total of 103 charities suspected of raising funds for terror have been shut or otherwise neutralized in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Kuwait alone. Some businessmen still manage to channel funds to various groups, often through third parties. But these channels are also being detected and shut one by one.
Those'd be the guys with the green eyeshades, tracking the dollars in their unspectacular manner. That's the part of the war we never see, and most of us wouldn't understand it if we did...
One reason for the growing ties between the Iraqi branch of Al-Qaeda and pro-Saddam terror gangs is the fact that the latter still have vast sums of money, mostly stolen from the Iraqi treasury before the fall of he regime, at their disposal.
... and they're burning that money at a rapid rate, as well. Even though it's a big pot, eventually they'll start hitting bottom. The more aggressively we press them, the higher their burn rate. Our economy's not happy with our burn rate, but we've got more bottom than they do...
The Islamist terror movement has suffered another disappointment. Its hopes of an international anti-American front, led by France and Germany, would emerge to isolate the United States and Great Britain have been dashed as President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder have balked at the idea of several more years of bad relations with Washington. Even the Spanish government of Prime Minister Zapatero, which owes its election to the Al-Qaeda attack in Madrid last year, has been careful to tone down its anti-American rhetoric.
And that's the result of the diplowar. It all ties together, even if the MSM can't quite manage to see it. You have to pay attention for that...
The biggest setback that the Islamists have suffered, however, is a change of mood in the Islamic heartland. The elections in Afghanistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Iraq, the freedom movement in Lebanon, the beginnings of reform in Egypt, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia have helped generate new interest in democratic reform. Also important are the efforts by Mahmoud Abbas to transform Palestine from an emotional cause into an issue of practical politics. Today, even Hamas, the most radical of Palestinian movements, is obliged to end its boycott of normal politics, and is getting ready to fight in the forthcoming parliamentary elections. While Bin Laden's message of hatred and terror still resonates in sections of the Muslim communities and the remnants of the left in the West, the picture is different in the Muslim world. There, people are demonstrating for freedom and, in some cases like Egypt a few weeks ago, even for more trade with Israel. This is a new configuration in which Islamist terrorism, although still deadly dangerous, has only a limited future.
Posted by:Fred

#3  American Future posted on this article but it was sourced from the Morocco Times. I guess it may be getting a broad distribution over there.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-03-26 9:29:55 AM  

#2   but looking at Allan worship as a way of life on one hand and bowling, business and babes on the other, probably the majority now own bowling balls, 7-11s, and Paris Hilton videos.

They don't have a prayer. In Americka a man who works his 7-11 can actually have the Pony and a bass boat.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-03-26 8:32:16 AM  

#1  Excellent in-line analysis, Fred. Spot-on and illuminating. I realize you stayed within the confines of Taheri's article outline, and that he was writing for The Green Truth - a damned narrow audience, lol, but much of the vacuum created by jihadi losses and failures is being filled - at least on the fringes, by something new... Bush Doctrine-generated ideas and notions of freedom and democracy. I'd like to hear what your thoughts are, when the limits are removed, heh.

IMHO, regards the Doctrine's pressure on the ME Shitocracies... it's just a taste here and there... but it's happening in places that have never even dreamed about it, much less gotten a taste, before. What's subtle is how quickly the tipping point is reached, once that taste is acquired. There are interesting times ahead. Some will get it faster than others, but all will want their turn, sooner or later. Even in the Heart of Darkness...

I believe the writing's on the wall and changes will keep coming as long as there's someone with Bush's vision and cojones in the Big Chair. I've joined the ranks of people, Verlaine in Iraq, et al, who are already beginning to wonder and worry about 2008. A 4 year setback with some Socialist Moonbat tool / panderer would not be reversed overnight.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-26 12:46:58 AM  

00:00