| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Creditors Ignoring Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act |
| 2005-03-28 |
| Posted by:Desert Blondie |
| #8 Please post a synopsis with a "fair use" segment quoted from the article for critical review - NYT requires registration from that link. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:03:37 PM |
| #7 They ignored it back in the fiorst Gulf War too - I nearly ended up in bankruptcy becasue of my service overseas. I had to find somone to take my case pro-bono against my creditors and enforce the SSRA. While I was in the desert getting shot at, they got a judgement against me when I did not answer service at my home address. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:02:44 PM |
| #6 Please post a synopsis with a "fair use" segment quoted from the article for critical review - NYT requires registration from that link. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:03:37 PM |
| #5 They ignored it back in the fiorst Gulf War too - I nearly ended up in bankruptcy becasue of my service overseas. I had to find somone to take my case pro-bono against my creditors and enforce the SSRA. While I was in the desert getting shot at, they got a judgement against me when I did not answer service at my home address. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:02:44 PM |
| #4 The SSCRA was the first government act in establishing a 'protected' group. It is also the only one which lays the responsbility of redress upon the victim. Had this been an ethnic group or other legally defined protected group, the US Justice Dept would have acted upon this a long time ago. This is what is know as 'Supporting the Troops' and that is within the government itself. |
| Posted by: Thinese Unomotch9553 2005-03-28 8:38:49 PM |
| #3 Bastards! Any company, judge or other person who violates this act ought to be put out of business. "¶At Fort Hood, Tex., a soldier's wife was sued by a creditor trying to collect a debt owed by her and her husband, who was serving in Baghdad at the time. A local judge ruled against her, saying she had defaulted, even though specialists say the relief act forbids default judgments against soldiers serving overseas and protects their spouses as well." This $%$&$*&^% should be impeached. Full stop, today. He violated a ferderal law and is unfit to serve on the bench. IF someone can get his name I will host a website to get the son of a bitch removed from office. AP I am going to send you a copy of the article at your work addy. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom 2005-03-28 4:17:15 PM |
| #2 Please post a synopsis with a "fair use" segment quoted from the article for critical review - NYT requires registration from that link. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:03:37 PM |
| #1 They ignored it back in the fiorst Gulf War too - I nearly ended up in bankruptcy becasue of my service overseas. I had to find somone to take my case pro-bono against my creditors and enforce the SSRA. While I was in the desert getting shot at, they got a judgement against me when I did not answer service at my home address. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-03-28 3:02:44 PM |