You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Canada willing to help Iran, despite Kazemi row
2005-04-01
OTTAWA - While publicly denouncing the killing of Zahra Kazemi in July 2003, Canadian officials were also quietly allowing an Iranian government official to visit Canada, according to documents obtained by CBC Radio. Iran had requested that one of its officials, Seyed Abu Talib Najafi, be briefed on the workings of Canada's new Advance Passenger Information database, designed to identify potential threats to civil aircraft before they board.<
You mean to say you briefed a terrorist supporting state on the workings of how you screen airline passenger lists for terrorists? Nice going, hoser.
According to e-mails obtained under the Access to Information Act, Customs officials were concerned about the visit becoming public. One e-mail said: "We should keep this as low-key as possible." Two e-mails within Canada Customs suggested there were concerns: "What's our position about the requesting country? ... in view of the current situation with Iran."
Your position is what it's been all along - on your knees
Just eight days previously, the Department of Foreign Affairs had recalled Canada's ambassador to Iran because it had refused Canadian inquiries about the Zahra Kazemi case. Kazemi, a Montreal-based photojournalist, was beaten to death after being arrested for photographing a Tehran prison riot. Iran maintains her death was accidental. Foreign Affairs told Customs officials its only concern was "whether [Najafi] will be able to get his visa in time."
They might as well work for our State department
In dozens of e-mails, there is no mention of Kazemi, and no one questions why Canada would help Iran, considered by some to be a brutal police state. As well, no one asks why a government with a known track record of sponsoring terrorist attacks might want information about a new passenger security screening procedure.
Yeah, how about that?
With just days to go before the visit, a flurry of e-mails reveals that there were last-minute concerns about Najafi's identity. Canada believed his first name was Nasser — only after he landed in Canada did they learn his actual name. And in an e-mail sent after Najafi was already en route to Canada, Chrystiane Roy, Iran desk officer at Foreign Affairs, informed Customs that if Najafi already had a visa, "it would be too late to do any screening." In the end, it was only the huge North American blackout of Aug. 14, 2003 that prevented the briefing session. Instead, Rachelle May, now acting director general of the Canada Border Services Agency, took Najafi across the street for a coffee. In a report sent afterwards to Foreign Affairs, she writes, "He showed interest in Advanced Passenger Information." She adds: "He was pleased that I took the time to meet him."
"Thank's for the briefing, infidel bitch. We'll make good use of it"
Posted by:Steve

#6  Maybe it really is time for a wall on that northern border of ours. Damn.
Posted by: anon   2005-04-01 5:20:59 PM  

#5  whater the status of the 10th mt?
Posted by: Half   2005-04-01 4:43:42 PM  

#4  An interesting link is the Canadian 40MW heavy water reactor (plutonium factory) sold to India (used to make plutonium for Indian A-bombs). Design then sold by India to Iran. Foundation laid in Arak, Iran and planned to become operational in 2007. So this is what Canadians mean when they tout "soft power".
Posted by: ed   2005-04-01 4:29:18 PM  

#3  I feel for my Canadian cousins--the ones who aren't in a head long rush towards dhimmitude. Their official institutions sure aren't looking after their long term best interests in this area.
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-04-01 3:57:08 PM  

#2  geez - an entire country that swallows
Posted by: Frank G   2005-04-01 2:56:04 PM  

#1  Quelle surprise.

(My meter just registered minus 10)
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-04-01 2:45:40 PM  

00:00