You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Tankers will stop oil to US troops in Afghanistan
2005-04-03
This article is from Friday April 1, but if carried out would present some problems to both the military effort as well as Afghan transport. I don't see how to deny fuel to military forces w/o cutting off all fuel shipments. No sense in becoming hostage to internal Pakistan politics. Better to import fuel from Tadjikistan and Uzbekistan and help their economy, than feed the Paki stupidity.

PESHAWAR: The All Pakistan Oil Tanker Owners Association (APOTOA) continued its strike on Thursday for an acceptance of its 20-point demand charter, saying it would stop supplying oil to US forces in Afghanistan from today (Friday).

Haji Muhammad Ayub, APOTOA's NWFP president, told Daily Times that oil and diesel supplies to US and allied forces in Afghanistan would be stopped from today unless the government accepted their 20-point demand charter. About 150 oil tankers cross into Afghanistan every day via Torkham and each tanker carries about 40,000 litres of fuel to US-led coalition forces in Afghanistan.

He said APOTOA had allowed 37 oil tankers into Afghanistan on Thursday, but would stop all tankers from crossing Torkham from today.

APOTOA office-bearers met NWFP Governor Khalilur Rehman on Thursday, but the meeting proved futile as oil tanker owners refused to call off their strike without a clear assurance of their demands being accepted.

Meanwhile, truckers said they had blockaded one of the country's largest oil terminals at Mehmoodkot, Punjab, and were preventing supplies reaching the north of the country from there, Reuters reported. Strikers had also stopped supplies of fuel from the terminal to US forces in landlocked Afghanistan, he said.

Pakistan State Oil played down the impact of the strike, saying it would not cause any shortages. "Our operations have not been disrupted even for a minute," PSO said in a statement.
Posted by:ed

#8  I think that the tanker drivers confused 20 demands with 20 questions.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-04-03 9:19:28 PM  

#7   number 16/ RE:rest stops: fresh supply of young goats.
Posted by: billy   2005-04-03 8:44:45 PM  

#6  I smell a CIA hit coming soon.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-04-03 7:18:05 PM  

#5  sounds like Haji and his trucker buddies don't want work. Bring in other tankers and armed escorts. Fuck these guys, and if the new tankers are attacked, kill Haji first
Posted by: Frank G   2005-04-03 6:25:06 PM  

#4  I know demand number 16.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-04-03 6:18:06 PM  

#3  I'm not certain the Union understands the groundrules.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-04-03 5:16:34 PM  

#2  AP-
Well, if you think about it, since when did they ever have to have their demands written down? I'm guessing they wouldn't have listed them until the US came groveling to the table.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2005-04-03 4:57:20 PM  

#1  So what are the 20 demands? Nothing in the linked article mentions any of the specifics.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-04-03 2:08:46 PM  

00:01