You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
MMA, govt extremists and moderate PPP
2005-04-05
By Mubasher Bukhari
An unseemly row over the mixed 'marathon' in Gujranwala that Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal workers disrupted on Sunday dominated yesterday's Punjab Assembly session. The verbal brawl began soon after the house started proceedings at 3.40 pm and essentially consisted of legislators hurling abuses and threatening each other.
Sounds like a typical day in the Pak legislature...
The MMA legislators argued that the mixed race in Gujranwala had nothing to do with the idea of a moderate Pakistan, but was an attempt to Westernise Pakistani women, something that was a blot on the national and religious identity of the people of Punjab.
Yeah. That's the way I'd Westernize Pak women: have them get out and run three kilometers in their burkas...
Any reason why we can't evacuate all the women and leave the men to the Punjab in pieces?
The women treasury members defended the mixed race and condemned the MMA activists who tried to stop women athletes from participating in. The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz supported the MMA's stand and they walked out of the house when Law Minister Raja Basharat moved a resolution condemning the incident.
Walked out, did they? Are you sure it was them? Has anybody actually ever seen them from the front?
The MMA's Arshad Mehmood Bagoo said the religious alliance supported women's role in society and their participation in indoor sports, but would not tolerate them running in the open in front of leering men. The alliance Mr Bagoo is part of strongly supported the Taliban in Afghanistan. Perhaps he has forgotten that the Taliban used to whip veiled women who were caught working in offices before hundreds of male spectators in the markets of Kabul. The self-styled Islamists once punished a men's football team from Chamman, Pakistan, for the sin of wearing shorts during a match with a local Afghan team.
Yeah, but this is different. Somehow.
The silence of the treasury's men in response to the MMA legislators was conspicuous, indicating that many of them agree with the MMA. Only the women on the treasury benches tried to counter the MMA leaders' arguments. The MMA legislators also vowed not to allow another 'mini marathon' with both male and female athletes in what was an open challenge to the government.
To the government? Or to the turbans?
Regardless of whether the MMA is right or wrong about mixed races being against societal norms, surely attacking women with clubs and throwing stones at them, which is what MMA workers did on Sunday, does not fit into our national and religious identity.
Uhhh... Actually it sounds kind of typically Pak. I realize there's a certain segment of society that's actually embarrassed about such antics, but they're methodically being gunned down or run out of the country, aren't they?
Rana Sanaullah, parliamentary leader of the PML-N, was his usual fiery self on the floor. He also opposed the mixed race, raising an interesting point. He said the government had forced girls from school and colleges to participate in the race. He said Rukhsana Nayyer, principal of Government Girls College Gujranawala, ordered all the students in the college to attend the race. The government accuses the MMA of imposing Islam forcibly. This is an example of how the government tries to enforce 'moderate Islam'. If the attitude of the MMA can be called religious extremism, the government attitude can rightly be labelled moderate extremism.
Ouch. The English language has just been bruised again.
Mr Sanaullah ended his speech by saying that no such race should take place unless the daughters and sisters of ministers also took part. Such a remark would normally be met with outrage from the treasury benches, but the ministers remained mum, re-enforcing the impression that they agree with the MMA and PML-N. It appears as if the treasury, the MMA and the PML-N are all hardliners in a way. But at least they were able to show, by contrast, who the real moderates in the assembly are. The Pakistan People's Party lawmakers didn't walk out with the MMA or PML-N, nor did they support the government resolution. It goes to show, once again, who President Gen Pervez Musharraf's real "moderate friends" are.
Posted by:Fred

#6  The PML is the main conservative party in Pakistan, and it's various factions have generally always been sympathetic to the Islamists aims. Before Musharraf came to power in his coup, the PML Prime Minister was going to introduce Shariah laws based on what the Taliban were doing in Afghanistan, and most Pakistan Muslim Leaguers were just as supportive as the Islamists.

Also, the Punjab is probably the second strongest bastion of Islamism in Pakistan, after the NWFP. The average Sindhi and Baluchi has never supported the Islamists to a great extent, the only votes that the Islamists get in those provinces are from (mostly Pashtun) immigrants. Some Punjabi cities like Gujranwala have become quite extremist over the years, and most of them are governed by members of the ostensibly moderate Pakistan Muslim League.
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2005-04-05 11:46:59 PM  

#5  And if Sen. Booby Byrd hears about this "mixed race", he'll be against it, too!
Posted by: OldeForce   2005-04-05 5:15:44 PM  

#4  help me - i though PML-N was being cultivated by Perv - that they go with MMA on an issue that is provoking the moderates, seems an open defiance of Perv. PPP, despite earlier support for the Taliban, is again acting as polar opposite to the MMA, and willing to defend the moderates and secularists in Pak society. It really seems Perv and PPP together could take a stand against MMA, esp. with MMA making mistakes, and with the global tide turning. Can they overcome Perv objections to PPP corruption, and PPP objections to Pervs militarism?

Also - IIUC - Punjab is less Islamist nutjobby than NWFP, Baluchistan, or perhaps even than Sind. Punjab is where the moderates and secularists can take a stand, I think.

BTW, treasury benches here means the govt supporters, does it not?
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2005-04-05 10:10:54 AM  

#3  Any reason why we can't evacuate all the women and leave the men to the Punjab in pieces?

I imagine quite a few of the women support the nutjobbery around them.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-04-05 9:34:07 AM  

#2  an entire country with a majority population of societally-stunted emotional children. Whackos abound, and Perv is riding the tiger
Posted by: Frank G   2005-04-05 9:12:42 AM  

#1  But were any beards insulted?
Posted by: Spot   2005-04-05 8:37:33 AM  

00:00