| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Tech |
| Concern over radioactive waste near Colorado River |
| 2005-04-08 |
| The Energy Department on Wednesday proposed to move a huge pile of radioactive waste away from the banks of the Colorado River -- a victory for environmentalists who fear the debris could poison the Southwest's major source of drinking water. The immediate reason for concern is that the waste is seeping into the soil, getting into the groundwater and working its way into the Colorado River. The larger, doomsday fear is that a major flood on the Colorado could wash the stuff into the river and poison the water. The Colorado supplies drinking water to about 25 million people in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix and other cities across the Southwest. The pile -- a mostly open-air heap that sits on bare ground and is surrounded only by a chain-link fence -- covers 130 acres (52 hectares) near the town of Moab and consists of about 12 million tons of dirt and other waste from decades of uranium ore processing. It contains toxic chemicals and traces of uranium and other radioactive substances. The Energy Department said it will recommend in an environmental impact statement that the waste be moved to a closed storage facility about 30 miles (48 kilometers) to the north, near Crescent Junction. The department said it plans no final decision until it reviews all public comment. The site is the only decommissioned uranium mill overseen by the Energy Department that has yet to be cleaned up. At the new location, the waste would be buried in a hole lined with a protective layer to keep the material from seeping into the groundwater. It would also be covered over. The waste began piling up in the 1950s after the dawn of the atomic age turned sleepy little communities in Utah into uranium mining boom towns. The Energy Department took control of the site in 2001 after the most recent owner of the mill, Denver-based Atlas Corp., declared bankruptcy in 1998 when it realized it could not afford to deal with the mess. This could be a major nuisance. The "Church Rock Disaster" of 1979 had the same proximate cause and still threatens much of the southwest's water supply. (About the Church Rock Disaster) |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #4 SD Union paper had a series of articles, with the latest saying it was gonna be moved. Ima thinkr to Fla, ok, Ship? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-04-08 10:12:46 PM |
| #3 Somehow, upon seeing the headline I knew it was referring to that uranium tailings pile near Moab. It can be seen on the right when descending out of the hills into Moab on US 191, just after passing the Arches Nat'l Park entrance. Someone driving past not knowing what it is probably wouldn't give it a second thought. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-04-08 10:10:09 PM |
| #2 phil_b: Church Rock is a major problem. It happens to be upriver from Lake Mead, which is a major water source for Phx, LV, etc. The worst problem may not be the radioactive contamination, but the really nasty heavy metals and other pollutants. It just needs one good flood to create major havoc. Right now, at half-hour intervals, they broadcast in Gallup, NM, warnings not to use water from the river or nearby wells. Church Rock is going to haunt both states for the forseeable future. Its real irony was that it happened just a few months after Three Mile Island, that joke, so everybody already had "nuclear accident fatigue". But whether the contaminants eventually make it to Mead, or they are blown into a populated area as dust, it's still a significant hazard. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-04-08 8:57:00 PM |
| #1 Church Rock Disaster - Mmmm! a disaster where no one was killed or apparently injured. Its language like this that causes a lot of people to dismiss this as alarmist claptrap peddled by people who are ideologically opposed to nuclear power. The reality is all mining without exception leaves waste behind and that waste contains toxic metals and a degree of radioactivity. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2005-04-08 7:27:41 PM |