| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks & Islam |
| Exclusivist vs. Inclusivist (Give him a break, he is trying to learn) |
| 2005-04-12 |
| During the nearly four years since Sept. 11, 2001, I have been looking closely at the situation of Muslims all over the world. The new threat of terrorism that has sprung up in many parts of the Muslim world is a constant source of worry and anxiety, not only to me but to millions of other Muslims the world over. The last two years in fact have seen terrorist acts in our own country. Such acts are alien to Islam and its ideology; they cannot be justified in any way since there is no justification for the murder of innocents. At the same time, there are those in the Muslim world who believe that "terrorist actions" are a direct reaction to — and a result of — attacks on Muslims in other places. There is no excuse for those "terrorist actions"; they lack any validity and violate every principle of Islamic behavior. Yes, indeed, I am well aware and do not deny that Muslims have been — and are — under siege in Palestine and Chechnya and even in certain parts of the Western world where they have been alarmed and frightened by a "rising tide of Islamophobia" emanating from some government officials, sections of the media and a few right-wing Christian leaders. John Ashcroft, the former US attorney general, has made some very insulting remarks about Islam. The Reverend Franklin Graham, a man with many followers, branded Islam a "very evil and wicked religion". Jerry Falwell, founder of the infamous, intolerant and narrow-minded so-called Moral Majority, even went so far as to accuse the Prophet (peace be upon him) of being a terrorist. In Bosnia, Muslims were expelled from their homes and butchered. In the Indian state of Gujarat, Hindu mobs massacred more than 2,000 Muslims in 2002. In the interest of fairness, however, we must admit that Muslim extremists have also victimized non-Muslims. Inexcusable events have taken place in the US, Indonesia, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Only last Friday, a Christian priest and his driver were gunned down in cold blood in Peshawar, Pakistan. In his new book, Dr. Akbar S. Ahmed faults both Muslims and non-Muslims for what he calls "hyper-asabiyah", excessive tribal, religious or nationalist loyalty. According to Dr. Ahmed, who holds the Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at the American University in Washington, D.C., too much asabiyah can be dangerous. It must be tempered and diluted by the Islamic values regulating human relations — justice (adl), knowledge (ilm) and balance and compassion (ihsan). In spite of Muslim differences and conflicts with Christians, Jews and Hindus, Dr. Ahmed says the "real battle of the 21st century" will not be between religions but between exclusivists on one side and inclusivists on the other. Exclusivists such as the terrorists who carried out the Madrid bombing concentrate on the differences between their religion and everyone else's, especially that of the despised enemy. They draw clear lines between themselves and "others". Inclusivists, on the other hand, concentrate on the similarity between themselves and others despite religious and national distinction. They draw on the famous Qur'anic "diversity verse" which says that God made humankind "into diverse nations and tribes" so that the various nations and tribes could "come to know each other, not despise each other". (49:13). Another Qur'anic verse that they emphasize is 2:256 which states clearly that there is "no compulsion in religion". The inclusivists are unfortunately now being silenced by an aggressive exclusivist minority which is betraying Islam's concept of justice and mercy and its guarantee of equal rights to women and minorities. According to Dr. Ahmed, the exclusivists' ideas have also resulted in increased violence as well as the persecution and silencing of scholars who do not agree with their interpretation of Islam. By taking this path, the exclusivists have negated all the principles of tolerance and compassion for which Islam has historically been noted and then added fuel to the flame by resorting to violence. It is pointless, in the face of such well-publicized exclusivist actions, for us to say that Islam is a religion of peace. We — including our religious scholars — must speak out and make the point strongly that exclusivism has nothing to do with us or with Islam. We can begin to do this by saying "No to terror." We should make people aware not only of the dangers of listening to the preachers of hate and intolerance but also of following them. Meaningful dialogue within our Muslim societies is probably the best way of countering this danger but in order to have a meaningful dialogue, we must be well prepared, able to quote the Qur'an in its proper context and possess an intellectual understanding of what we are opposing. Dr. Ahmed calls for a new global positioning in which Muslims put themselves in place of non-Muslims who fear them. Non-Muslims need to listen to what Muslims are saying instead of ceaselessly telling them how — and what — to think. Along these lines, the need for consistent international morality must not be overlooked. If we can solve the problems in Palestine and Iraq, the terrorists will have much of the ground cut from beneath them. If we can stop the menace of Islamophobia, we could then engage in meaningful and inclusive discussions with other groups and religions. No solution to any of these problems lies in the expert using of words at conferences. Important as that may be, it must be followed by a determined, cooperative effort by all concerned. Muslims must get rid of grievances against their fellow Muslims. And Muslims, instead of wallowing in self-pity and a lack of self-confidence, must face their own reality, remove ignorance from their midst, and ensure good governance along with the dignity of Islam. This would put into practice the same inclusivist Islamic values that all Muslims must incorporate into their daily lives in order to defeat the exclusivists. Achieving this — or even just beginning it — would create a new mindset and a new way of thinking among us. At that time, I can assure you, we will assuredly not be under siege. |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #2 "The Reverend Franklin Graham, a man with many followers, branded Islam a âvery evil and wicked religionâ. Jerry Falwell, founder of the infamous, intolerant and narrow-minded so-called Moral Majority, even went so far as to accuse the Prophet (peace be upon him) of being a terrorist." Now, I don't think much of Franklin Graham and find Falwell laughable, but I think they both nailed it there. |
| Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-04-12 12:31:16 PM |
| #1 It's not such a black-n-white thing. One feels we can be exclusive to muslims, inclusive of everyone else. We are the world, baby, but we don't need or want you. |
| Posted by: BH 2005-04-12 12:17:41 PM |