You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Musharraf proposes dividing Kashmir into 7 parts
2005-04-25
Omnis Kashmiria in septem partes divisa est...
In an interview to the CNN, President General Pervez Musharraf has said that there is a scope to divide Kashmir into seven parts. "The parts of Kashmir held by Pakistan and India separately can be divided geographically into seven parts," The News quoted him as saying in Jakarta on the sidelines of the 50th Afro-Asian summit. "Either any specific portion of the Kashmir or its entire area could be declared a non-military zone. The status could be changed afterwards," he added. He further said that whatever the portion be for this purpose, it must be made with consensus between India and Pakistan and he hoped the masses of both countries could accept it. "Deployment of heavy troops on both sides of Line of Control (LoC) is creating problem for the people," he said.

Friday's statement assumes significance in the light of an earlier statement made by him on October 25, 2004, when he told select journalists at an Iftar dinner that India and Pakistan should consider the option of identifying some "regions" of Kashmir on both sides of Line of Control, demilitarise them and grant them the status of independence or joint control or under UN mandate. The statement created a controversy and there was a response from India that there would no redrawing of the boundaries. After his talks in New Delhi, President Musharraf stated that there are three main elements as far as the Kashmir issue is concerned -- India's position that there would be no redrawing of the boundaries, Pakistan's position that the LoC cannot be a permanent border and third that the softening of the borders will help, but is not a final solution.
Posted by:Fred

#10  What about the part the Chinese still occupied. Can we count that as the eight part?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-04-25 6:42:20 PM  

#9  Mojo, yea, but... that is perfect passive conjugation (description of what is in place [what is done over with]) while Fred is talking what is about to take place (gerund future passive participle [what will inevitably happen]).

Gallia is, as whole, divided into three parts.

Whole Kashmir(ia) will be divided into 7 parts.
(the second has the same gramatical quality as in "Carthago delenda est")
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-04-25 3:39:39 PM  

#8  That reminds that story of a soviet Marshall (Rokossovsky?) who interrogated a German POW:

-What do you think will happen to Germany after the war?
-It will be cut in many small parts.
-Cut in small parts! But not for Germany, for Germans.
Posted by: JFM   2005-04-25 2:52:56 PM  

#7  What, and Pakistan gets all the parts?

Does "hudna" translate into Urdu (or whatever he speaks)?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-04-25 12:31:19 PM  

#6  "Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres..."
Posted by: mojo   2005-04-25 11:28:45 AM  

#5  Gee. How about dividing Jerusalam into (infinite) parts?
Posted by: Fas Kickn-As   2005-04-25 11:03:55 AM  

#4  Demilitarizing the border sure would make it easier for Pakistanis terrorists militants to cross and blow up women and children. How about Pakistan withdrawing from the parts of Kashmir they invaded.
Posted by: ed   2005-04-25 10:29:03 AM  

#3  The Solomonic Solution. Pity there isn't anyone on the Indian Side to say, I love Kashmir too much to let it be divided, so let Pakistan have the whole thing.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-04-25 10:22:45 AM  

#2  Nice - how about dividing Pak into 7 wards parts
Posted by: Frank G   2005-04-25 8:05:12 AM  

#1  Omnia...divienda, Fred, albeit I bet that you used the medieval latin variant. ;-)
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-04-25 12:41:32 AM  

00:00