You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
UT Developing Rail Gun, Aggies Nervous
2005-04-28
The University of Texas at Austin's Institute for Advanced Technology (IAT) Electromagnetic Systems Division showed off it's electromagnetic rail gun (RailGun) technology demonstrator at the 24th Army Science Conference (ASC 2004), and DefenseReview was lucky enough to get to view it being fired. IAT's demonstrator rail gun fired a lightweight aluminum projectile (approx. .45 caliber) through a soft target (cardboard or foam, I think) at high speed, and, well, it was pretty neat. Founded in 1990, IAT is an autonomous research unit tasked with aiding the U.S. Army and Navy with "basic an applied research in electrodynamics, hypervelocity physics, pulsed power, and education in related critical technologies". In other words, they research, build, and test electromagnetic RailGun tech for the Army and Navy.

With an electromagnetic rail gun (a.k.a. EM projector), you don't even need explosive projectiles, because the projectile velocity is so high that the kinetic energy will create all the destructive force you need. As an added bonus, you also need much less projectile mass--the projectile can be much lighter and smaller, and still achieve the same level of destructive force. Assuming that DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), ARL (Army Research Laboratory) and NAVSEA (Naval Sea Systems Command) can overcome all of the inherent technological challenges and solve all the potential problems with elecromagnetic (EM) propulsion--like improving superconductivity of the gun rails and thus avoiding excessive heat and destruction of the gun upon firing and adequate power generation for the weapons system--America's enemies will be in even bigger trouble than they already are.

The U.S. Navy plans to utilize EM rail guns on its DD(X) Destroyer. If successful, the DD(X) Destroyer will be a lethal combination of stealth technology and EM weapons technology. The enemy won't be able to see it/locate it past 30 kilometers out, and the DD(X) will be able to locate and kill that enemy from about 100 kilometers out, and possibly as far out as 200 kilometers. You do the math. And, the kinetic energy projectiles can be GPS guided.

DoD (Department of Defense) and th U.S. Army are looking at electromagnetic (EM) gun tech for Future Combat Systems (FCS) "transformation" program, which will by a "system of systems" or "family of systems" and utilize futuristic vehicles and weapons systems. FCS will take advantage of network centric warfare technologies. GlobalSecurity.org has a very informative page on Future Combat Systems (FCS), here. Imagine tanks, infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), howitzers, and smaller cannon systems that utilize electromagnetic propulsion weapons instead of chemical propellant (gunpowder), and thus fire smaller, lighter projectiles at much higher speeds, thus achieving the same or superior results against enemy targets. The EM gun systems will also allow vehicles to carry much more ammo into battle (smaller and lighter projectiles with no gunpowder, remember?). Anyway, if the U.S. military and development partners can perfect the technology, it's going to be a brave new world on the 21st century battlefield, no doubt. Just make sure you're behind the gun.
Posted by:Steve

#10  GS - Spoken like a true TAMU! Lol!
Posted by: .com   2005-04-28 10:53:56 PM  

#9  The U of T has been developing this technology for 20+ years to date, and the solution is always a few more million dollars down the road. I hope there is a plan B for the DD(X) main armament.
Posted by: Glavising Slack5995   2005-04-28 10:51:55 PM  

#8  Hook'em horns! Hey maybe we should install one on to Vince Young's arm? "Go long, I'll hit ya in the end zone. (fling)Oops, sorry. I'll get your arm back for ya".
Posted by: Bill   2005-04-28 5:52:02 PM  

#7  I'm kind of missing something with that demo. It seems to be like showing how a horseshoe magnet can pick up iron filings, "but the one we're working on can crush an aircraft carrier into a ball."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-04-28 3:49:26 PM  

#6  You can get really high velocities out of those things, too. How about an electromagnetic rifle firing 0.1 calibre needles at about 3000 fps?
Posted by: mojo   2005-04-28 3:22:28 PM  

#5  And the second one after Virginia.

(I'm only half joking.)
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-04-28 3:14:37 PM  

#4  Remember, support the naming of the first DDX after Robert Anson Heinlein.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2005-04-28 2:40:09 PM  

#3  When will my man portable unit be ready :D
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-04-28 2:28:11 PM  

#2  LOL Steve. Get ready to explain it to Hupins.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-04-28 1:53:16 PM  

#1  If we ever get a base on the Moon a rail gun would work very well for sending stuff back to earth or further on out into space. These things are the bees knees.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-04-28 1:46:00 PM  

00:00