You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Schroeder, Clark call for nuclear arms reductions
2005-04-28
BERLIN - German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark called in Berlin on Thursday for "credible steps" toward nuclear-arms reductions. They issued their call ahead of Monday's talks at the United Nations on the 35-year-old Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is up for a month-long review. "This is the expectation of both of us as these talks commence in New York," Schroeder said after talks with his visitor from New Zealand. Clark said: "The conference couldn't be more timely. We must seek the proper balance between the potential for peaceful utilisation of nuclear energy while at the same time preventing military abuses." The review comes amid mounting pressure from critics such as Germany who say the NPT has failed to keep nations such as North Korea, Israel, Iran, South Africa, Iraq, Pakistan, India, Taiwan, and Libya from seeking or building atomic weapons in the past or now.
What, you expected them to pay attention to a silly piece of paper....oh, right, we're talking about Helen and Gerhard, sorry.
Berlin also says it has not done much to reach its goal of eliminating the nuclear arsenals of Britain, China, France, Russia, and the United States.
SEE: above paragraph
Posted by:Steve

#6  A good first step, for Schroeder at least, would be to stop his country's trade in nuclear, dual-use, and tools/equipment to make nuke/dual use products. Germany is more than a tad too fond of selling the wrong kind of high-tech machinery to Iran, f'r instance. Bloody-handed hypocrite.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-04-28 9:29:04 PM  

#5  How about this: All the nuclear powers tell everybody else to NOT DEVELOP NUCLEAR WEAPONS,..

Yep, a step toward reductions is for there to be no new members to the club. Thanks to AQ Khan, it's going to be rough going tho..
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-04-28 3:50:38 PM  

#4  I've long wondered what would happen if someone were to smuggle a ship with AK-47s and ammo in to the Maori in NZ. The whites have set up the place so that you could conquer it with a butter knife, yet still treat the Maori as dogs, and it would be funny as hell to see them kicked off the island by their new rulers. What could they do, sue? Whine?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-04-28 3:43:19 PM  

#3  What, Schroeder and Clark are going to run for the Berkeley City Council?
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex)   2005-04-28 3:36:32 PM  

#2  Morons. Neither has nukes, thank god. I can just imagine "Dear Leader" Clark with a couple of SS18's...

How about this: All the nuclear powers tell everybody else to NOT DEVELOP NUCLEAR WEAPONS, on pain of being flash-fried in the streets. "We determine you have 'em, or are real close, you get a glassy new parking lot where your capital used to be."
Posted by: mojo   2005-04-28 3:05:22 PM  

#1  
Well if these countries had any nuclear weapons and more than just a symbolic defense capability they might deserve some input. But they don't. These pussies are going to have no solution to a nuclear Iran because they choose not to. We will have a solution because we are not a bunch of socialist and neo-communist white trash. Lil·li·pu·tians trying to rope the Gullivers down. Germany has become the suck boy for France. New Zealand needs to worry about it's sheep population.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-04-28 2:42:53 PM  

00:00