You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Zarqawi mouthpiece retracts threats against White House, Vatican
2005-05-04
In a statement issued May 1, 2005 from al-Qaeda in Iraq entitled: "A Statement from al-Qaeda Denying the Media Comments about the Speech of its Leader," the group's official spokesman, Abu Maysara al-Iraqi, responds to media interpretations of Abdul al-Rahman al-Iraqi's message concerning attacks upon the White House and Vatican.

As reported by the SITE Institute, Abdul al-Rahman, the Deputy Emir (Prince) of al-Qaeda in Iraq, allegedly voiced an audio message issued on the Internet April 30, 2005 declaring unwavering support for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. In the course of his speech, he stated: "If you lead us to the White House and the fortress of the Vatican, we will be patient and endure with you." Al-Maysara's statement refutes the media's assertion that this is a threat upon the White House and Vatican, although he says that "it will be great to do so, to please Allah
." The message states that "the oppressors of the truth misrepresented it" and he only meant that "even if he [Zarqawi] had to cross the ocean, or walk to Washington and Rome he will do so, and we will be with him."

On the jihadist message board on which the statement was posted, one member agrees that the media perpetrated a "misrepresentation of the facts, in the manner that serves their benefits," and another adds that they are "reshaping it so it can serve their dirty goals." Both members, however, are agreeable about "a take over of the Vatican" and explain: "our Prophet had promised us that the Muslims will be able to take over Rome, and Allah willing, that will be soon
 we are coming, we are coming."
Posted by:Dan Darling

#7  I keep thinking of the old Get Smart gag.
"Look, buddy. I hope I wasn't out of line with that crack about 'lead us to the White House.'"
Posted by: Jackal   2005-05-04 22:48  

#6  thugadeen between the two open sewers

Very nice, Tkat.
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-05-04 09:33  

#5  Glad we got that clarification. Thanks alot spokesman for the Shite-head laplion of the thugadeen between the two open sewers.
Posted by: Tkat   2005-05-04 09:00  

#4  Yeah, Rex, they're only apologizing for being caught! I can't find any other way to interpret those quotes (on audio in his voice, no less) except as a threat to the WH and Vatican. To say ''Sorry, what we meant was XXXXX, but I'm o.k. with storming the WH and Vatican'' is not an apology or retraction, but an affirmation of what he meant.
Posted by: BA   2005-05-04 08:37  

#3  Two words: Swiss Guards
Posted by: Pappy   2005-05-04 01:22  

#2  Now I didn't read the whole piece, but that doesn't sound like much of a retraction. So until further notice, the Bite Me rule is in effect.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2005-05-04 01:01  

#1  I'm sure the new Pope Benedict XVI would have something to 'say' about such a ''take over''! It would take little for God's Rottweiler to awaken the masses of millions to a Holy Christian Crusade, in defense of the faith!!
Posted by: smn   2005-05-04 00:37  

00:00