You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.N. Party Planners Wonder, Will Anyone Bush Attend?
2005-05-30
SAN FRANCISCO, May 28 - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has indicated she will not attend. So has former President George H. W. Bush. The controversial nominee for United Nations ambassador, John R. Bolton, has not been heard from, nor has President Bush, who was sent an invitation in February.

Getting big-name administration officials to attend events outside Washington is always a long shot because of their busy schedules. But in the case of the 60th anniversary celebration of the founding of the United Nations, which will take place in San Francisco late next month, some organizers are wondering if something beyond scheduling conflicts is at play.

Nancy L. Peterson, president of the United Nations Association of San Francisco, a nonprofit group that has been planning the celebration, said no explanation had been offered by the White House. But she said some members were worried that President Bush's seeming disdain for the world organization might be behind the silence and no-shows. "We are a month out, and that's cutting it close," Ms. Peterson said. When asked if San Franciscans felt slighted, she said, "I think the administration is slighting about 45% of the American people by not stepping forward on behalf of the United Nations at this turning point."
Sounds like a hostess afraid that the frig won't be able to hold all the leftovers.
At the last big anniversary celebration, 10 years ago in San Francisco, where the United Nations charter was signed in 1945, President Clinton played a prominent role. Sherri Ferris, who is organizing the 60th anniversary invitations, said Mr. Clinton's office had indicated that an appearance next month "is still under consideration." She expects many invitees will fix their June calendars next week.

As of this week, invitations had been accepted by several international figures, including Shashi Tharoor, an under secretary general at the United Nations; Mary Robinson, the former president of Ireland who was the United Nations' high commissioner for human rights; and Ernesto Zedillo, the former president of Mexico.
Real A-list there.
But no member of the Bush administration was among them, organizing officials said. "It doesn't mean they aren't coming, and it doesn't mean they are," said Peter Ragone, a spokesman for Mayor Gavin Newsom. Mr. Ragone added, "We've become accustomed to not expecting the Bush administration to attend official events in San Francisco."
Ever wonder why?
As president, Mr. Bush has visited California numerous times but has avoided the overwhelmingly Democratic San Francisco, where he garnered just 15 percent of the vote last year. Ms. Rice, who taught for many years at nearby Stanford University, was interrupted by antiwar protesters when she spoke at the Commonwealth Club here on Friday.

A spokesman for the National Security Council, where a call to the White House about the president's invitation was referred, said he did not know the invitation's status. A spokesman for the State Department, Noel Clay, said that "the delegation has not been determined," and that Ms. Rice remained a possible attendee. But Ms. Ferris said the secretary of state had indicated to "someone of stature" on the organizing committee that she would not be attending.

For now, the 16-page official program to the celebration is vague on the subject of dignitaries. The entry for the opening event on June 25 says "speakers will be announced."
Mary Robinson might be as good as they get. She'll be rude and nasty to her hosts, of course.
Posted by:Steve White

#8  But they have gun control, so it's impossible that a would-be assassin would get her hands on one.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-05-30 19:42  

#7  Actually, Squeaky never got off a shot. She had problems getting the safety off, and supposedly there wasn't a round in the chamber.

Then again, there's likely enough Squeakys in the Bay area now that one of 'em might get lucky.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-05-30 11:51  

#6  If Hillary went, Zombie of LGF would get pictures of her with every wacko-nut job and the golden gate bridge in the background so they could be used in 2008.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2005-05-30 10:25  

#5  2b, reread the article, the did call the Clintons. Even they are still considering wether to attend or not. And has anybody heard about Bill becoming the new UN Secretary General as of late? That seemed to die REAL quick.
Posted by: Charles   2005-05-30 10:03  

#4  call Clinton, he'll go. Especially if they have lots of those hungry third world girls and boys the UN likes to keep around.
Posted by: 2b   2005-05-30 07:09  

#3  This was a stupid tranzi trick - try to shame / rope the administration into supporting the UN or look nasty - and they got called on it.

Idiots.
Posted by: anon   2005-05-30 07:01  

#2  I can think of no logical reason that Bush would be safe or welcomed in San Francisco. San Francisco and the Bay area pretty much stand for everything at least 51% of the country is against. Screw it, they all should stay home.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-05-30 05:13  

#1  Well, the good news is that Squeaky Fromme is still in prison. The bad news is that asshats like Ward Cleaver Churchill have been cranking out new Squeakys regularly since she took a shot at President Ford.

Fuck San Francisco. This is like that crap about Bush going to Pyongyang. If he does, then he certainly has reasons that elude me.
Posted by: .com   2005-05-30 04:16  

00:00