You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Qazi says 9/11 was a planned conspiracy to crush Muslims
2005-06-05
The events of 9/11 were designed to crush Muslims all over the world, said Qazi Hussain Ahmad, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) president and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) ameer, on Saturday. After the fall of Communism, the US made Muslims its prime target and the NATO secretary general declared that after Communism, Islamic fundamentalism was the biggest danger to the world, Qazi said while addressing the annual certificate distribution ceremony of Syed Maududi International Institute of Islamic Education.

Qazi said the Pakistani government was working as an "agent" of the US and NATO, who have established military bases in Afghanistan near Pakistani borders. He said that General Pervez Musharraf is working as an American ally against Islamic movements and is also a friend of India. He condemned Musharraf for saying that Israeli premier Ariel Sharon was a brave general and soldier. The MMA accused Gen Musharraf of provoking people against religious forces and asking them not to vote for religious parties because they are extremists, which was a violation of the constitution. He said that Musharraf was an opponent of Muslim unity and was dividing the Muslims. Qazi said that the military and bureaucracy had been trying to eliminate Islamic leaders since independence. He said that the honour and independence of ulema would be protected. He said sectarianism was not only a religious division, but a geographical division as well. He said that the institute had been successful in making students, from different cultures and speaking different languages, live and study together under an Islamic environment.
Sounds like Qazi gave a real stem-winder. The spittle must have been hitting the back rows on that one. It's almost inspiring watching Qazi and his fellow conspirators take an attack on us and try and turn it into an attack on them. The idea of Muslim unity's inherent in the idea of the Caliphate, but it doesn't seem to leave much room for the Shiites in Pakland, nor for the Qadianis, nor for the Ismailis, and eventually it wouldn't leave any room for the Brelvis. Maududi was known as the Great Apostasizer, for his habit of excommunicating groups from Islam. The basic flaw in Pakland is that it was founded on the basis of religion — a separate homeland for the Indian Mooselimbs. Once you've got the idea of a state founded on religion, then it's a pretty short step to insisting that it be run as a theocracy.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Ahhhh, a conspiracy! Well I never saw that coming. Michael Moore was right then! Man, I've been so naive.
Posted by: Unose Whavitle7547   2005-06-05 20:02  

#4  Never thought about it before Phil but you're right. Islam the Amway of Religons.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-05 19:57  

#3  If we really wanted to crush muslims, we would start with an nuclear carpet bombing of the major cities of Saudi Arabia for starters.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-05 18:27  

#2  It's a masterpiece of passive-aggressive moral equivalence.

That said, one question that bugs me... then why haven't we crushed Muslims? We walk around the Islamic world on eggshells while the Chia Iman tm has, AFAIK, remained silent about the very real attacks by Sunnis on Shi'ites in his country, and the attacks by the Taliban on Moslems in Afghanistan (even extending to the most recent attack on a Mosque)... and hundreds of similar attacks in Iraq by the alleged holy warriors...

While I'm at it, I'd like to point out something regarding the history of Islam: Mohammed started out with NOTHING and created a religious/political/military movement that by the ffirst century after its founding had conquered a big BIG chunk of the known civilized world at the time. He did it by offering most of the potential new converts ways OUT of the oppressive caste systems and tribal divisions that were prevalent in the world at that time.

It's also a matter of historical record that a lot of the converts Islam made on the subcontinent were from people trying to escape oppressive tribal/caste relationships.

Whenever I see a news item from Pakistan, though, or from a dozen other Middle Eastern countries, it looks as though they've turned their back on that part of Islam's legacy. They've gone ahead and instituted caste systems of their own, even in the greater community of Moslems: they have tribal battles, they have caste systems, they say the Shi'ites aren't "real" Moslems, they have the same problem with Sufis, and the penalties for an individual breaking these tribal/caste boundaries seem to involve the punishment of the clan as a whole, and younger female relatives in particular.

If you've been a frequent reader of this site, you've read about the sort of incidents I'm talking about already; if not, search on "jirga" and "rape" to see what I mean.

The saddest thing is that the man-on-the-street, as it were, knows this isn't the way things are supposed to be, but the governments and mullahs in the area have decided on his behalf that the United States is to blame for all of this, and a lot of people go along with it.

Meanwhile, even if Pakistan didn't have nuclear weapons and military action were an option, it would take a lot more resources than our army has to pacify the country and impose real law-and-order on the place... and a lot of the people who suffer from the lack of real-law-and-order would be our enemies in the venture.

Just a thought.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-06-05 14:22  

#1  ....Anyone else here notice you never see Qazi and James Randi (www.randi.org) together?
Just wondering.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2005-06-05 14:02  

00:00