You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
In Blow to Canada's Health System, Quebec Law Is Voided
2005-06-10
EFL:TORONTO, June 9 - The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Quebec law banning private medical insurance in a decision that represents an acute blow to the publicly financed national health care system. The high court stopped short of striking down the constitutionality of the country's failing vaunted health care system nationwide, but specialists across the legal spectrum said they expected the decision to lead to sweeping changes in the Canadian health care system. "The language of the ruling will encourage more and more lawsuits and those suits have a greater likelihood of success in light of this judgment," said Lorne Sossin, acting dean of the University of Toronto law school.

Patrick Monahan, dean of the Osgoode Hall Law School of York University in Toronto and a well-known critic of the national health care system, was even more emphatic about the import of the decision. "They are going to have to change the fundamental design of the system," he said. "They will have to build in an element of timely care or otherwise allow the development of a private medical system."

The Canadian health care system provides free doctor's services that are paid for by taxes. The system has generally been strongly supported by Hillary Clinton the public, and is broadly identified with the Canadian national character. Canada is the only industrialized county that outlaws privately financed purchases of core medical services.
But in recent years patients have been forced to wait longer for diagnostic tests and elective surgery, while the wealthy and well connected either sought care in the United States or used influence to jump medical lines.

The court ruled that the waiting lists had become so long that they violated patients' "life and personal security, inviolability and freedom" under the Quebec charter of human rights and freedoms, which covers about one-quarter of Canada's population. "The evidence in this case shows that delays in the public health care system are widespread, and that, in some serious cases, patients die as a result of waiting lists for public health care," the Supreme Court ruled. "In sum, the prohibition on obtaining private health insurance is not constitutional where the public system fails to deliver reasonable services."

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by Jacques Chaoulli, a Montreal family doctor who argued his own case through the courts, and George Zeliotis, a chemical salesman who was forced to wait a year for a hip replacement while he was prohibited from paying privately for surgery. Dr. Chaoulli and Mr. Zeliotis lost in two Quebec provincial courts before the Supreme Court decided to take their appeal. In a news conference, Dr. Chaoulli declared a victory and predicted that the decision would eventually apply to all Canada. "How could you imagine that Quebecers may live," he asked, "and the English Canadian has to die?"
Posted by:Steve

#6  It's due to climate change, Seafarious, causing more runoff from the glaciers, which leaches the minerals and toxins from the land that cause cerebral looniness. Alementary, dear Watson.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-06-10 21:39  

#5  Huh. Private medical insurance and no shariah law. Better check the water; some common sense seems to have leached in...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-06-10 21:05  

#4  I had no idea that the Canadian Government outlaws private medical services! No wonder the Canadian Expats would come here, all the way from the Magic Kingdom, to have knee surgeries and other surgeries that we consider minor.
Posted by: TMH   2005-06-10 14:34  

#3  The Canadian health care system provides free doctor's services that are paid for by taxes.

Haaahahahahahaahahaaaa.....

It's not really "free" then, is it?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-10 14:05  

#2  Agreed, murray. And a Quebecois court at that!
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-06-10 14:01  

#1  The courts actually struck down a socialist law and came down on the side of individual choices and rights?

In other news, hell just froze over....
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-10 11:55  

00:00