| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Stupendous LLL hypocrisy: "Piss Christ" creator joins denunciation of Koran abuse |
| 2005-06-12 |
| Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy |
| #28 Name-calling is a sign of desperation No, in your case it's a sign of our frustration at having to read the ravings of a fool. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2005-06-12 23:52 |
| #27 Fuck you, War, and stuff your forgiveness. Pray I let you live, if only in agony, you dhimmicrat pussy. "Jesus died for somebody's sins - but not mine..." -- Patty Smith |
| Posted by: mojo 2005-06-12 23:24 |
| #26 Oh my goodness. I haven't laughed this hard in quite some time. I think that dear "War on Islam" should lead us all by example. You start the attack, WoI, and we'll be right behind you. Or anyway, we'll catch up after the tea and cream cakes have been properly digested (yes, yes, the strong stuff is there on the sideboard for those of you who loathe tea, right next to the embroidered napkins -- what kind of a hostess do you think I am?). Ok, to be honest, I won't be coming... I'll be needed here to clean up after, and then I simply must take a nap, but all the others will be along shortly, I'm certain. And if you haven't a nuke of your own, dear WoI, although I must tell you that anyone who is anyone got an adorable little neutron bomb for Christmas courtesy of Old Spook's unparalleled generosity, I'm sure you'll be able to gin up something useful -- some Molotov cocktails to throw at a mosque, or send away for a few Korans to desecrate. But as I said, we'll all (excepting me, of course) be right behind you. Promise! |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2005-06-12 22:47 |
| #25 Be nice. Remember, you 46%ers endorse subsidizing Islamofascism, and indulge al-Sadr power politics. I don't want a ballot in the hands of those koranimals; I want bullets in their foreheads. Name-calling is a sign of desperation. I want US troops in Iraq, in order to keep the local savages away from OUR oil fields, and to break up that vulgar lunatic asylum that has posed as a state for too long. Please join in my chorus: Nuke Mecca! |
| Posted by: War on Islam 2005-06-12 22:35 |
| #24 "I hope a dainty soft-liner like you can handle the truth, Old Spook." What rkb said above, about the Clue Train. More specifically, War, you give the term "fucking idiot" a whole new dimension: you're one of those blubbering hysterics who've got no spine, no stomach and no brain, and just want to "nuke Mecca" because you don't have either the patience or the intelligence to see a long struggle through to the end which will allow your grandchildren to look themselves in the mirror every morning and not see genocidal mass murderers. Useless fucking coward. Sit down and shut up, and leave this war to the adults. Because you are NOT one. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2005-06-12 22:11 |
| #23 Friday, the Washington Post had an article about SUNNI soldiers (http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=121288&D=2005-06-10&HC=1) which, while not glowing, was not completely negative. Did this not fit your "mold"? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2005-06-12 21:14 |
| #22 Listen, "War", we've lost 1,700 soldiers in Iraq. Even if I grant you tens of thousands of Iraqi deaths in the last two years, how does that compare to over 400,000 dead people in Saddam's mass graves? How does that compare to Saddam's Baathist/Sunni minority wielding a club against a Shiite/Kurd majority of roughly 20 million people? People are still getting blown up in Iraq every day, but about 25 million Iraqis aren't involved other that seeing it on TV or reading it in the newspaper. I'd say Bush is doing fine under the circumstances. As for nuking Mecca, there is little doubt in my mind that the Islamofascist Saudis have a day of reckoning coming. But it's not today. A nuclear Iran is a bigger problem today. You're either a poser or an idiot. |
| Posted by: Tom 2005-06-12 20:59 |
| #21 LOL - so much for ROPMA |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-06-12 20:50 |
| #20 I hope a dainty soft-liner like you can handle the truth, Old Spook. Like Pappy said, with that single statement you demonstrate that you have failed to take any deliveries off of the clue train that stops at RB on a daily basis .... |
| Posted by: rkb 2005-06-12 20:15 |
| #19 I hope a dainty soft-liner like you can handle the truth, Old Spook. You don't know who Old Spook is. I suspect what you know about the situation might a 3X5 card on his desk. Idiot. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2005-06-12 19:55 |
| #18 The only thing those statistics tell me is Islamists are killing other Islamists. They won't survive a standup fight against trained soldiers so they bravely attack the only folks they can: civilians. |
| Posted by: badanov 2005-06-12 19:45 |
| #17 ima free thinker too, is thatn my bong you hammerin on? Damn freepers. |
| Posted by: Half 2005-06-12 19:42 |
| #16 Hi Rex! |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-12 19:40 |
| #15 I hope a dainty soft-liner like you can handle the truth, Old Spook. Stats reveal that the Islamofascist terrorists - at least those (like al-Sadr) who are not Bush-dhimmis - can spike US casualties at will. Their attacks are generating increasing casualties, per terrorist action. http://icasualties.org/oif_a/Lunaville.htm You should be aware that Iraqi military deaths are on the rise, as US theater troops either bunker down or give operations over to special ops. These totals do not include the serial slaughter of would be police/military recruits. http://www.icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx AP recently reported that almost 100% of Iraqi soldiers are Shiites. A free thinker like me would conclude that the Shis are taking a jihad subsidy from Uncle Sam. Don't let the White House put words in your mouth; its not sanitary. Nuke Mecca! |
| Posted by: War on Islam 2005-06-12 19:38 |
| #14 War, you posted a pablpable lie in your insane diatribe. "In fact, terror attacks are increasing in both. " Wrong. Prove your statement, especially compared to data a year ago. Shorten your horizone and hand pick statistics and you can lie just as badly as the other lardass thats just like you when it comes to truth: Michael Moore. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2005-06-12 17:38 |
| #13 I see the short bus showed up. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2005-06-12 17:37 |
| #12 Simple solution. Declare ALL guards at Gitmo to be "artists"...give 'em all Gummint grants...encourage them to let their artistic spirits free, and thus change "debasement" of the Koran into "artistic expression". Next problem please. |
| Posted by: Justrand 2005-06-12 15:27 |
| #11 Hi Rex! |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-12 15:05 |
| #10 Secular Blasphemy: Bush's "faith based" mob of Bible-mutts and the spineless morons who support him, have all but buried Secularism in the Middle East and Central Asia. The nominal victories against Taliban/Baath were achieved at the cost of alliances with the same Islamofascists who carried out the 9-11 terror. On Sept. 11, 2001, Egypt's Secular government held over 19,000 koranimals in prison. Three years of Bush pressure has put over half of those terrorist pigs back on the streets, in the name of his oil-patch polluted notion of "freedom." Listen!!! If it made sense to outlaw Nazism and (Japanese) Militarism after WW2, would it not make equal sense to outlaw Islamofascism, and wage total war against these elements, on a global scale. You people talk tough, but it is a fact that the jackass in the White House has not pacified either the Afghan or Iraq dog's breakfasts. In fact, terror attacks are increasing in both. Currently, 54% of Americans support withdrawl from Iraq. I believe that most of the declining support is extremely weak, and wavering. Troop recruitment, in face of one-arm-behind-the-back nation-building pseudo-war, has dropped in each the past 5 months. And why the hell not? Why participate in a winless farce, directed by suicidal misfeasants? If you defend Bush's civil-policing/political-inclusivism (viz political-Islam) policies then you are both morally blind and intellectually bankrupt. Try to go beyond name-calling. Start by saying: Bush blew it! You will feel better without the apologist-baggage that hampers free thought at this forum. Thank me, and beg for my forgiveness! |
| Posted by: War on Islam 2005-06-12 14:59 |
| #9 Ya gotta hand it to the NYT: When it comes to desecrating religious symbols, they went out of their way to find an expert.... |
| Posted by: Ptah 2005-06-12 14:54 |
| #8 It is pretty simple to figure out the LLL and how it works. Look, they hate the US, our sense of values and our government, so anything that can be used as a tool to break down the country is fair game. Logic has nothing to do with it. PCB (Piss Christ Boy) sees Koran Abuse™ as a useful tool. Logic? Don't bother me with your stinkin' logic! |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2005-06-12 13:09 |
| #7 I guess Anne Coulter was more rationale than anyone thought when she commented that the 911 guys took out the wrong building in NY. |
| Posted by: Jack is Back! 2005-06-12 12:22 |
| #6 Yeah, I was just being optimistic. A dangerous thing in unsettled times. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-12 12:19 |
| #5 Exactly - and a dangerous one, too. |
| Posted by: too true 2005-06-12 12:13 |
| #4 Not hypocrisy. A declaration of alliance. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2005-06-12 12:11 |
| #3 Bare-knuckle satire will become an endangered species as the LLL media-cult becomes more desperate in the coming years. This is because their worldview is rooted in the business of fantasy, advertising and entertainment, and is therefore utterly inflexible in the face of real challenges. Their only option will be more of the same: louder, crazier, shriller; more emotion, more radical 60s memes, more extreme and outrageous repetition of the same old themes. They can't change their tune, they can only turn up the volume. Their actual positions and statements will exceed anything that the most skilled satirist could devise. |
| Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy 2005-06-12 11:27 |
| #2 Hell, this gotta be somekinda statement in and of itself..... may be on our side. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-06-12 11:24 |
| #1 Someone whose claim to fame involves mixing religious symbols and urine is complaining about religious symbols and urine? Stupendously jaw-dropping. I don't see how ScrappleFace can ever compete with stuff like this. You don't suppose Scott Ott is feeding these articles anonymously to the 'respectable media', do you? |
| Posted by: SteveS 2005-06-12 10:59 |