You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
"That's not a solar sail! It's a Space Mirror!"
2005-06-22
PLANETARY SOCIETY TO TEST DEATH RAY WEAPON PLATFORM IN SPACE
Islamic Community Net
June 21, 2005

"We estimate that a solar sail could reach speeds of 100,000 miles per hour and for example Voyager One right now is travelling about 37,000 miles per hour and it's going to take it thousands of years to reach the nearest star system. Solar sailing might be able to get us there in a more reasonable time, perhaps within a human lifetime."
-Charlene Anderson, Associate Director of the Planetary Society
Tuesday, 21 June, 2005


Do the math: The nearest star to the Sun is Proxima Centauri at a distance of 4.28 light years. Each light year is 5.88 trillion miles. So the distance in miles to the nearest star is 25,166,400,000,000 miles. Even at Anderson's projected 100,000 miles per hour, the "Planetary Society's" "solar sail" would take 251,664,000 hours to get there. There are 365.25 days in a year and 24 hours in a day, for a total of 8766 hours per year. 251,664,000 hours divided by 8766 hours per year yields ***28,709.1*** years.

28,709.1 YEARS!

That's one heck of a "human lifetime" - even a "reasonable" one. The question arises as to why Charlene Anderson, Associate Director of the Planetary Society, would push such a bald-faced lie on the public in support of the Planetary Society's "Cosmos 1" space sail project. Why the fraud?

What's so bad about a "solar sail" that quietly wings its way through the "billions and billions" of stars in Carl Sagan's cosmos that it requires this level of fanciful "travel to the stars in a human lifetime at 100,000 miles per hour" hype to overcome public resistance?
The problem is this: western society has a facility for euphemism. A mass, disorderly retreat by cowardly troops is a "strategic withdrawal of forces". Genocide is called "rural pacification". Legalized baby-killing is "choice". Whores are "commercial sex workers". A christian crusade against Islam is called a "war on terror". And so on.

The pleasantly named "solar sail" evokes a scene of mostly harmless gentle motion in an airless void. Actually the "solar sail" is the latest attempt to orbit a highly reflective "space mirror" with all that that implies. In fact, the solar "sail" is PRECISELY a very highly reflective space mirror. The mission parameters for the Planetary Society's "Cosmos 1" are practically identical to those for the Russian Znamya-3 space mirror that was never implemented - until now:

EXCERPT
Znamya (1997)
Znamya-3 experiment is a significant phase of the SRC reflector development program. It requires substantial modification of a Progress M spacecraft. An additional thin film reflector of much larger size (60-70 meters) will be incorporated to the outer spacecraft structure. A new control device will also be introduced which will allow the spacecraft to control a large moment of inertia without using reaction control thrusters. The Znamya 3 reflector may also incorporate an array of thin film photovoltaics into the reflector structure as part of the test. The main goal of the Znamya-3 experiment is to test a new reflector concept and design in space, and verify major design characteristics.
-

Okay, then, the "solar sail" is really a space mirror. So what's wrong with a "space mirror"? Let's take a peek:

EXCERPT
ABC (American Broadcasting Corporation)
October 24 (year unstated)
"...they feel so confident they're even talking about building mirrors larger than a football field that could be placed in orbit high above the Earth. But instead of facing out, these mirrors would face in, looking at the Earth instead of into space. A mirror that large could provide high-resolution images of half of the globe, allowing scientists to keep track of weather systems, fires, and all sorts of things.


ALL SORTS OF THINGS.

Heh.

And just what "sorts of things"?

Let's see:

EXCERPT:
The dream of the space mirror dates back to Hermann Oberth, the great mathematician and physicist, who in the early 1920s published Ways and Means to Space Navigation. In his book Oberth described various uses for space mirrors, including its destructive forces as a military weapon, capable of destroying cities and incinerating armies in the battlefield from space.

"a military weapon, capable of destroying cities and incinerating armies in the battlefield from space."

Ah, THOSE "sorts of things".

No wonder Charlene Anderson has to lie through her teeth to gain public acceptance for the euphemistically named "space sail".
I knew I should have bought that Alcoa stock.
Posted by:Steve

#13  ANngie, I'm aware of that :-)

Thats why I stipulated hjigher velocities to get it down to a human lifetime. I was trying to emphasize that once you get to relativistic velocities, human lifetimes are incredibly long back in this frame of reference.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-06-22 23:06  

#12  ...the faster you go, the slower time goes for the humans aboard.

It only seems slower.

(100,000 mph isn't relativistic, OS.)
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-06-22 21:24  

#11  That's not a moon. It's a space station!

Obi Wan Kenobi, Star Wars
Posted by: Bobby   2005-06-22 21:16  

#10  There is something called "islamic science"

The Jinn- A Scientific Analysis

Link

"As a faculty member at the Quaid-e-Azam University, Hoodbhoy found himself challenging the establishment during the 1980s when he noticed some bizarre, indeed hilarious, ideas creeping into the domain of science. It was the era of Zia-ul-Haq. The erstwhile army general had banned freedom of expression and had set Pakistan on the road to Islam. Hoodbhoy says the period also witnessed an Islamisation of science that Pakistan had never seen before.

Scientists began to write and discuss ‘scientific papers’ on such topics as the angle of God, the temperature of Hell, or the latent energy of jinns. One university professor of physics wrote a paper on the speed at which Heaven was departing from Earth. A nuclear reactor scientist argued that jinns were made up of methane gas and proposed that jinn energy may be tapped to meet Pakistan’s energy requirements.

The political climate in Pakistan has changed over the years — and the Zia-ul-Haq-inspired brand of science doesn’t get the encouragement or protection that it used to. But it hasn’t entirely gone away, either, says Hoodbhoy"
Posted by: john   2005-06-22 19:00  

#9  One little piece of math the moron missed: relativistic effects on the "Cargo".

"Solar sailing might be able to get us there in a more reasonable time, perhaps within a human lifetime"

THis means if they work them to where they can obtain higher velocities, they will get there faster, and the faster you go, the slower time goes for the humans aboard.

I guess the Muslims must have a different physics in their world of moonbats, dhimmis and kehfirs.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-06-22 18:10  

#8  Diamonds are forever
They are all I need to please me
They can stimulate and tease me
They won't leave in the night, I've no fear that they might desert me...
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-06-22 16:56  

#7  Deacon---You will need an an Acme Solar Sail (Space Mirror) Multiple Mirror Deceleration Kit with anti-matter creator/retro-rocket feature for quicker stops.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-06-22 16:50  

#6  He also forgot about acceleration time and deceleration time. How do you stop something going 100,000 miles an hour? Very big brakes?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-06-22 16:34  

#5  Given that is is a sub missile, it does make me feel a bit more secure.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-22 16:10  

#4  The launch failed (premature first stage booster cutoff). Either the craft is in very low orbit or (most likely) has already reentered the atmosphere and is on bottom of artic ocean.
This is the second russian launch failure in the past few days. A booster with a military comm satellite fell onto a siberian forest after first stage failure.

Posted by: john   2005-06-22 15:50  

#3  Note to self: Double-check all the fields next time before you want to make a pseudonymous post. Damn.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-06-22 14:58  

#2  Do the math: 28,709.1 YEARS! That's one heck of a "human lifetime" - even a "reasonable" one.

Poor dumb dope. He missed the forest for the trees.
Posted by: Halliburton Immortality Division   2005-06-22 14:57  

#1  OH BOY... I don't know where to start with this one, and I have to get back to work now.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-06-22 13:51  

00:00