You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Economy
EADS Resolves Rifts, Opens Alabama Facility
2005-06-28
Airbus parent company EADS recently announced its choice of a site in Alabama to build a new refuelling plane for the US military, as part of its bid to win the USAF's $23.5 billion contract to supply the next generation of air-air refuelling aircraft. EADS said the Brookley Industrial Complex in Mobile, AL had beaten off competition from Florida, Mississippi and South Carolina as part of a very competitive process to host the "KC-330 Advanced Tanker" production facility, which would hire up to 1,100 personnel if EADS should win against Boeing's KC-767. The A330 was selected as Britain's next-generation tanker aircraft, for instance, in an innovative leasing arrangement that echoes some aspects of the cancelled Boeing KC-767 deal. This effort is also interesting in light of EADS recent corporate and legislative challenges.

EADS took pains to stress that the company was in Alabama for the long haul, with an on-site "Airbus Engineering Center" that EADS spokespeople claim will begin recruiting next year. The company has been working hard to improve its access to the U.S. defense market, despite congressional hostility and legislative proposals that has hampered its efforts to be considered for military contracts, and even put a crimp in project-related alliance discussions with U.S. contractors like Northrop Grumman. Efforts to become a "more American" company and create job dependencies in key congressional districts are certainly part of that game. The firm has also been reeling lately over a major executive battle that has left its top jobs in limbo, even as the cost of the super-jumbo A380 has left the firm somewhat tight for cash and rival Boeing has surged ahead with projects like the 777 and 787. That executive conflict was recently resolved, but it has cost the company considerable momentum and some fallout from that conflict is expected to persist.
I'd perfer Boeing, but just hurry up and get us a new tanker before the KC-135's start falling out of the skies.
Posted by:Steve

#1  ..even as the cost of the super-jumbo A380 has left the firm somewhat tight for cash and..

Haahahahahaha, why would they care? If the A380 isn't a commercial success, what is Airbus going to do, go out of business? Not likely, when aircraft development costs are subsidized.

If Airbus wants a shot at a defense contract, tell 'em they have to stop subsidizing their commercial airplane development, otherwise no dice.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-28 10:48  

00:00