Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Culture Wars |
All the news that's fit to make up |
2005-07-07 |
New York Times corrects an "error". Editors' Note Published: July 7, 2005 The Op-Ed page in some copies yesterday carried an incorrect version of an article about military recruitment. The writer, an Army reserve officer, did not say, "Imagine my surprise the other day when I received orders to report to Fort Campbell, Ky., next Sunday," nor did he characterize his recent call-up to active duty as the precursor to a "surprise tour of Iraq." That language was added by an editor and was to have been removed before the article was published. Because of a production error, it was not. The Times regrets the error. Hat tip to Captain's Quarters |
Posted by:Steve |
#5 I think a good old fashioned destruction of their seditionist printing presses would be a good thing. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom 2005-07-07 15:18 |
#4 "That language was added by an editor and was to have been removed before the article was published. Because of a production error, it was not." Removed before publishing?!? The fact it was in there in the first place shows that the New Yuck Times' "knee-jerks" are America hating blame-US-first scumbags first, and journalists second. |
Posted by: Hyper 2005-07-07 15:01 |
#3 Tut, tut, boys. Even I must admit that was a bit blatant. I can't stress enough how much we really have to make an effort not to get caught at these shenanigans all the time. It's starting to get embarrassing. Oh, well. Off to the club to have one for Judy Miller. Anything for the First Amendment, eh Judy? Bring my limo around. Ta-ta... |
Posted by: Pinchy 2005-07-07 13:54 |
#2 As someone on another blog said about the MSM: they're not blatant about their biases, they're brazen. |
Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-07-07 13:17 |
#1 That language was added by an editor and was to have been removed before the article was published. Because of a production error, it was not. Um, which is it, the editor's fault or the convenient 'production error'? The Times regrets the error. The Times regrets getting caught. |
Posted by: Raj 2005-07-07 13:13 |