You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
"Bomber" Superimposed onto Metropolitan Police Surveillance Camera Photo?
2005-08-04
(Picture at link)
..."At first, (almost) everything looks fine, but look closer... look at the guy with the white hat... check out his left arm (HIS left arm).... the lower of the rails of the railing is IN FRONT of his left arm... where of course it shouldn't be! I'm NO image specialist, but this sure looks ridiculous. I'd say itÂŽs a fake."

The CLG has also inspected this image. "The white-hatted man was apparently superimposed onto the photo. Not only is his arm 'behind' a railing that is supposedly several feet behind HIM, but also, upon magnification in Photoshop, part of the bar actually goes into his head. This was 'touched-up,' but pixels of his head mix unmistakably with pixels from the railing..."

Actually not. It's a function of a low-res camera with a transfer from videotape to a compressed video format.

Here's the man cropped from the original pic, original size.

And here's the same image enlarged...

In the smaller version, you can see that the light on his cheekbone appears distinct from the shading of the bar. The detail is lost on enlargement, making it appear that the bar runs into his head at an angle. Bars actually seldom do that. Note also that the bar appearing to run into his sleeve is also at an angle. Now, here's the cheekbone with more enlargement...

The bar running into the guy's head again resolves into two separate pieces (almost). The sleeve enlargement is here...
... and while it doesn't resolve as well as the bar-cheekbone meeting, it still retains its dip and then edges upward again, which probably makes it the stripe on the guy's jacket.

The moral of this story, of course, is that if you're an idiot you shouldn't dabble in conspiracy theories.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#30  A large portion of the population either can't read or are barely literate, so they believe anything printed on paper. And, in most cases, the governments are not participatory, so what the people experience really is the result of secret plans in unknown places. Finally, the media feed them the most egregious nonsense all the time. So you get a society living on its nerves, incapable of judging reality from fairy tales.

In my very humble opinion...
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-08-05 00:03  

#29  A final note: have you noticed that a strong propensity to conspiracy theories seems to be a characteristic of all of the countries that were conquered by the Mongols or the Turks back in the day? It seems to be built into the structure of the government the same way the Mukhabarat is.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-08-04 23:36  

#28  Many thanks, Phil, and feel free.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-08-04 23:07  

#27  AC, I'd like to quote that description of conspiracy theories on my 'blog.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-08-04 20:14  

#26  There is a danger, curious, which is why the theories must be designed to appeal only to those who are not moderate or neutral. This is a fairly difficult task, but there are ways.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-08-04 18:34  

#25  Isn't there also a very real danger if you use this domestically? I know very little about psyops, but it seems to me that you run the risk of cementing in the minds of neutral / moderate people a false picture that the government is out of control and should be voted out of office.
Posted by: curious ....   2005-08-04 18:15  

#24  The conspiracy Conspiracy:

Buwahaaahaaa! Little do they know; the real master plan involves sowing panic, fear and confusion among the Moonbats by promoting lunatic conspiracy theories.
It's a hell of a lot cheaper than a jackboot gestapo and unlike, say, a nuclear strike, it preserves our real estate and other capital assets.

In all seriousness, lurid conspiracy theories can be (and are in fact) a very successful component of our "black" propaganda.

The objective is to appeal to the vanity of idiotarians, always an easy task, while planting the seeds of doubt, fear, dissension, and confusion.
A good (if somewhat simplified) example would be a claim that Rovian forces have introduced some new kind of mind-control technology. This appeals to the individual Moonbat's elitist vanity, confirming its place on the cutting edge by virtue of knowing what others do not. However, upon reflection, it can also cause the Moonbat to doubt its own sanity.

Similarly, criticism of fellow radicals for various inconsistencies and shortcomings can be seen as ideologically rigorous, appealing to pseudo-Maoist elements in particular, but it will inevitably sow dissension and resentment.

It is always possible to raise suspicion that a devoted radical may in fact be a COINTELPRO plant or wing-nut troll. The target may resist this successfully, but the stain will linger. Accusation, the act of denunciation, has a hypnotic appeal for radicals, probably for its associations with absolute power, and they will not easily give one up once it is made.

Stories of unvincibly sinister assassination squads and flawlessly concealed disappearances appeal to leftist egoes, helping them to identify with glamorous Latin American revolutionaries and Hollywood rebels. If seriously believed or even seriously suspected, though, they have the same effect as actual assassinations and disappearances; paranoia, suspicion, and intimidation.

Finally, as I just intimated, conspiracy theories attribute real power to the conspirators. Totalitarian sympathizers ultimately fear and respect nothing else. A steady diet of conspiracy will embed the power of their enemies firmly into the leftist worldview, with an obvious potential for generating conflict and divided loyalty.




Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-08-04 18:03  

#23  They are Mossad agents..in sports casual attire
Posted by: Kent Mccord   2005-08-04 15:13  

#22  Great intro from Anonymoose!
Posted by: intrinsicpilot   2005-08-04 12:49  

#21  
Ever bodi luvs sumbody sumtime...

the bar runs into his head at an angle. Bars actually seldom do that.

Oh, now friend I wouldn't be saying that.... Ima say hello Mister Bar many times.
Posted by: Deano   2005-08-04 11:59  

#20  Ah, we now know the evil Joos plot. It's really Manny, Moe, and Joe.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-04 11:19  

#19  If it was faked you can guarantee there would be no sign. They would have cleaned up everything.

This reminds me of the lunar landing photos that some idiots claim are faked (yet actual photographers can easily explain). I don't get the conspiracy folks, they live in a twisted world.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-08-04 09:50  

#18  SMITHERS!!...
Posted by: Monty Burns   2005-08-04 09:47  

#17  Hmmm. Obviously a MI5/mossad/cia conspiracy to perpetuate the rape of the two beautiful arab daughters of Baghdad and Jerusalem. I knew this even before I zoomed in on the so called man in the white hat aka Bush! This message was revealed to me by magik text written in code in a pile of dogcrap I saw in the gutter yesterday. And no, I was not drinking too much green tea at the time!
Posted by: CuriousGeorgeGalloway   2005-08-04 09:18  

#16  Nah. He was beamed in there by the Mossad.
I thought everybody knew that...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-08-04 08:29  

#15  Much ado about nothing.
Posted by: W Shakespeare   2005-08-04 07:46  

#14  I zoomed in on it and it shows nothing of the sort. It's a security photo. The definition is too low to support the kind of naked eye analysis that this site is claiming.

Might I suggest the effects described are a side effect of interlaced video?

Specifically, each "frame" of video -- NTSC and PAL -- is made up of TWO pictures. For PAL, they're each taken 1/50th of a second apart. Any motion between those two pictures will cause odd effects when it's viewed as a single frame.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-08-04 07:24  

#13  smn, may I suggest a higher grade aluminum foil for your headgear?
Posted by: leader of the pack   2005-08-04 07:04  

#12  [span class=PeterLorre]
It's a conspiraceee, I tell you, a conspeeraceeeeee!
[/span]
Posted by: Mike   2005-08-04 06:24  

#11  11A5S, before you wholeheartedly dismiss all conclusions, remember the Lee Harvey Oswald 'Gun In The Yard' photo? An obvious tamper by our government, to set a conclusion of doubt, at the time! Aptly explained in the critically acclaimed "JFK"!
Posted by: smn   2005-08-04 05:55  

#10  Bollocks.
Posted by: Howard UK   2005-08-04 05:38  

#9  unbalanced individuals who will accept the assertion of some unknown hoaxster without question

You got that right.
Posted by: Rafael   2005-08-04 02:15  

#8  Aww, the game is afoot! Why would Scotland Yard insert the 4th man, when obviously he wasn't there? Was it to 'team them up' for a nice conviction wrap up? or more sinister; the fact that they don't want to tip someone off to where he truly was surveilled!
Posted by: smn   2005-08-04 02:12  

#7  I zoomed in on it and it shows nothing of the sort. It's a security photo. The definition is too low to support the kind of naked eye analysis that this site is claiming.

I have to say that I've never understood these kinds of claims. Is it the thrill of hoaxing thousands? The need to prove that the government is intrinsically evil and must always be altering documents and test results? (I mean who knows what the Constitution originally said, dude? Like George Washington was a hemp farmer, if you know what I mean. The right to smoke reefer _must_ have been in the Bill of Rights.) All I know is that tomorrow it will be on the websites of thousands of unbalanced individuals who will accept the assertion of some unknown hoaxster without question while subjecting every claim and statement of the government to prejudiced scrutiny.
Posted by: 11A5S   2005-08-04 02:00  

#6  LC-Optical illusion.
Cameras can be funny that way.


Exactimundo! - His left arm is bent at the elbow and his forarm is parallel to and above the rail...

Of course the police do have that sophisticated holographic projection equipment {WINK}... They could ruin these guys image with their perverted followers by projecting each of them carrying a ham... {he he he}
Posted by: BigEd   2005-08-04 01:58  

#5  If you look closely, you can plainly see that the dude wearing the white cap is George Bush himself, off to his side is Cheney, the dude wearing the black hat is Blair, and first guy through the doorway is my cousin.
Posted by: Rafael   2005-08-04 01:24  

#4  Optical illusion.

Cameras can be funny that way.

Thanks,
LC FOTSGreg

Posted by: LC FOTSGreg   2005-08-04 00:51  

#3  Are they Diebold cameras?
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-08-04 00:46  

#2  who and or why would someone do this? This is very concerning when you think of who would have access in the first place to do it.
Posted by: Jan   2005-08-04 00:27  

#1  Ah! A conspiracy! Or maybe pixel burn-in...
Posted by: PBMcL   2005-08-04 00:25  

00:00