You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
POS Dances on Reagan's Grave, Pisses on Nixon's
2005-08-10
Photos at the link
A California man dubbed a "Satanist" on an online message board has posted photos of himself dancing on President Ronald Reagan's grave, raising the ire of the former chief executive's admirers. Posted on Ruthlessreviews.com (warning: vulgar site), the photos show a thin, white man likely in his 20s wearing an AC/DC T-shirt and having hopped over the fence that protects Reagan's grave. The poster, who goes by "The Freak Kingdom" and claims he's from San Diego, writes with one photo: "Judging from my expression and body language, combined with what little I do remember, this appears to be about the time security guards noticed I had jumped the fence and started jigging over Reagan's rotting corpse (the original plan called for the Electric Slide, and then humping the ground, and then whatever else I could get away with, but security was stricter than we had anticipated)."
I hope "strict security" means they beat this asswipe to within an inch of his life.
Continues the post: "We had to tear a-- out of there and lose security in the parking lot, but we appear to have gotten away scot-free."
Damn.
The post is signed "Monte."

Most responding to the post were congratulatory, with one poster exclaiming, "That is spectacular." Several e-mails have crisscrossed the Internet about the incident, with one person claiming to have contacted authorities: "I forwarded the pictures to the Reagan Library, the FBI and the National Archives. They have turned the case over to their lawyers and have been in the process of determining if there is any legal action they can take against this individual. I tracked down a website where this guy has posted more pictures of presidential grave desecration and even has orchestrated a national contest to see how many of these website members can desecrate the most presidential graves around the country."
I hope this works. That scumbag needs to spend a few hours answering "questions" in a Secret Service back office.
"Monte" appears to be pursuing that goal, also posting on a different site a photo of himself purportedly urinating on President Richard Nixon's grave at the presidential library in Yorba Linda, Calif.

Talk-radio host Chris Dickson was enraged by the Reagan incident. "I was at the Reagan Presidential Library in February of this year," he told WND. "'Dutch' was my commander in chief. I have personal interest in getting this individual and trying to protect the desecration of presidential graves against First Amendment rights."

A spokeswoman at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., refused to talk about the incident, saying – after putting WND on hold for a time – that she had "no comment."
Wimp. You're fired.
Posted by:greenchair

#14  Ronnie Jr?

1966-The only reason that the Reagans didn't move into the historic governor's mansion in Sacramento, was that Nancy was worried about then 7-year-old Ronnie walking to school in downtown Sacramento traffic...

I KID YOU NOT!
Posted by: BigEd   2005-08-10 14:42  

#13  Could have been Ronnie Jr.?

No, Ron's been shitting on his old man for decades, long before the great man passed on.
Posted by: Chris W.   2005-08-10 13:43  

#12  Well, if you do a Google Search on "Freak Kingdom" and "San Diego" You get the fact that the creatin posts to alot of blogs. Also there is one curious hit with "Man seeking Woman in the United States" as the title. Don't go there unless you are curious about exhibitions of localized anatomy... {Warning XXX}.

He has "issues".... big time... But there are plenty of lefty "babes" who'd go for the stunt... It could have been done to show off to some woman he is trying to impress...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-08-10 12:00  

#11  It's good for his well being that he only signed, "Monte". If he gave his real name, some of the regular citizenry might get to him before any of the authorities, (owing to all the internet resources available) and then there would really be a mess -- literally and figuratively...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-08-10 11:50  

#10  Could have been Ronnie Jr.?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-10 11:31  

#9  Once again, this raises the "willingness to be civil to the uncivil" question. At what point does society say 'enough' to *ssholes like this and physically punish them? Nonsensical tolerance results in kooks and freaks abusing ordinary people minding their own business. It is not vigilantism to attack those who attack you and that which you love, though that is what proponents of nonsensical tolerance would train you to think. "Let the law punish them", is a meaningless statement to such malefactors. They are either unable to appreciate, or indifferent to their offense and its potential punishment. They do not understand the legal punishment, so let them be physically punished. The state is unable to mete out such punishment, so it must be done by the populace as a whole. Just as the United States is geographically too large to expect a policeman within easy distance at all times, and thus every person must behave at times as a policeman in enforcing the law; so, too, people must be willing to physically punish lawbreakers at the scene of their crime. Just as a puppy would receive a swat for defacating on the floor, an ordinary citizen should automatically give a swat to someone who would defacate on our flag, or our society, or its or their loved and cherished possessions. In real terms, what would be your response if you read "Man caught urinating on grave of President Nixon, beaten by security guards and thrown off premises"? Would it strike you as either unjust or a violation of his rights, or as a fair and equitable punishment, and one likely to deter such behavior in the future? Cruel and unusual punishment is a relative thing.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-08-10 10:46  

#8  Neither of the corpses gives a damn.
Posted by: mojo   2005-08-10 10:19  

#7  Someday "Monte" will be in the wrong place at the wrong time...and it won't be pretty.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-08-10 09:25  

#6  This guy is such a loser, if he were to "disappear" forever tomorrow, I doubt his family and acquaitances would know or care. Waste of a good AC/DC shirt
Posted by: Frank G   2005-08-10 09:02  

#5  Oh, c'mon. We all know it'll take years for the urine smell to dissipate from Carter's grave, and Clinton's will have its own, unique source of pollution.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-08-10 07:19  

#4  actually, I think they are smart to say, "no comment". The worst thing they can do is to dignify the little brat with an official comment. We all know what happens when you feed trolls. More publicity will only mean more copycats.
Posted by: 2b   2005-08-10 04:57  

#3  Another Lefty Alternatist andor Anarchist who supps despotic, Govt-led Universal Regulation, Centralism, and Socialsm, etc. as long as it doesn't apply to him. All Americans should give thanks to God for Nixon, Reagan, and Bush 1, and even for the Democrat POTUSes of yore, however imperfect, for these would not recognize, and do not compare to, the "Treason = Patriotism"," Nazism > Hitlerists-for-Stalin" Commie DemLeft and Clintons of today!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-08-10 01:07  

#2  I'm upset in the way that I get upset when I see somebody doing something so utterly stoopid and tasteless that I want to look away. This is just Beavis and Butthead on a political trip, complete with the AC/DC tee shirt.
Posted by: Fred   2005-08-10 00:42  

#1  What a sicko, and with a flag wrapped around him as well.
Damn piece of slime.
It's upsetting to see our youth not show proper respect and behave so asinine.
Posted by: Jan   2005-08-10 00:22  

00:00