You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Schroeder Rejects Military Option Against Iran
2005-08-14
German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder rejected the threat of military force against Iran yesterday, hours after US President George Bush said he would consider it as a last resort to press Tehran to give up its nuclear program. Schroeder, one of the most prominent European opponents of the US-led war in Iraq, told an election rally in his home city of Hanover that the threat of force was not acceptable. "I am worried about developments there because no one wants the Iranian leadership to gain possession of atomic weapons," Schroeder said.
But if it comes down to a choice of Iran developing nuclear weapons and the U.S. beating the hell out of them, you'd rather they had nuclear weapons? Brilliant.
"The Europeans and the Americans are united in this goal. Up to now we were also united in the way to pursue this. This morning I read that military options are now on the table. My answer to that is: 'Dear friends in Europe and America, let us work out a strong negotiating position. But let's take the military option off the table. We have seen it doesn't work,'" he said.
Actually, it's worked pretty well. Ask Mullah Omar. Sammy's out of the dictator business and Uday and Qusay are decomposing. There are Baathists among the guys we're fighting in Iraq right now, but they're never coming back to power. So the military option does work. If the military option's on the table it will make the diplomatic approach work better — there'll be an incentive to reach a deal rather than duke it out with the Marines.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Hmmmmmmmm, so GLOBAL ISLAMIST/JIHADIST STATE does NOT extend or mean GERMANY nor to the German people, just as it doesn't to FRANCE - you betcha boy!? And "JIHADIST" > is NOT mean any future Global Islamic Govt./Bureaucracy will NOT be in a permanent "state of war" like the USSR-Red China -OOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, whether dedicated Muslim or Convert, "state of war" = you have no rights except thru the now Global Mad Mullahs, aka the Central Committee/Presideum of Global Mullahship!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-08-14 21:24  

#10  I hope you're correct, TGA, but media stuf like this makes me worry. I'll feel lots better after the election and formation of a new government.

I didn't know Howard Dean had a sister?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2005-08-14 16:37  

#9  If it limps like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a lame duck.

If two people in negotiations have a sense of goodwill, and that there is give and take and a vision of the common good, then negotiations will proceed and conclude successfully.

If one of the negotiators has no intention of give-and-take and jacks the other around, then the only negotiating tool the other has is a big stick leaning agin' the wall in the corner of the room.

Without a stick, the EU3 don't have jack sh*t to back them up. Their only tool is appeasement, which has been used a few times in the last century, but to little avail. Nice bag of tricks you have in your kit, Herr Schroeder.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-08-14 15:45  

#8  Hey, I was surprised that Kerry was competitive. Go figure.
Posted by: Darrell   2005-08-14 11:58  

#7  It just seems so clear cut, I'm surprised Schroeder is competitive at this point.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-08-14 11:55  

#6  Mrs Davis, campaigns will be campaigns. Stoiber is realizing that he needs to mobilize voters in the conservative South to upset losses in Eastern Germany.

Remember, he only lost the elections by 6000 votes which he could easily have secured in Bavaria with a little more effort.
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-08-14 10:19  

#5  Let's get Sammy swinging, sooner rather than later. A nice public hanging will stiffen the spine of our "allies" and tighten the sphincters of our "less than allies."
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-08-14 10:14  

#4  I hope you're correct, TGA, but media stuf like this makes me worry. I'll feel lots better after the election and formation of a new government.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-08-14 10:10  

#3  As I said yesterday: Ignore the lame duck.
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-08-14 10:02  

#2  "I ask you 'Does it advances the iterests of the Arian volk?'."
Posted by: gromgoru   2005-08-14 09:21  

#1  "Dear friends in Europe and America, let us work out a strong negotiating position. But let's take the military option off the table. We have seen it doesn't work."

Dear Schroeder, it certainly worked very well in Germany's case: it converted a nation once bent on genocidal conquest and domination of the entire planet, into a nation of pacifist perennial vacationers and pensioners with all the imperialist impulse of a bag of turnips. Force not only worked, it worked very, very well.

Almost too well, it seems.

Posted by: Dave D.   2005-08-14 07:58  

00:00