You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
British Boobs Breaking Bustline Boundaries
2005-08-15
The breasts of Britain's women have grown by a cup-size in the past decade and could be changing the shape of the female spine, according to new research. An average bra size of 34B 10 years ago has increased to a 36C across this country and Australasia, the bra manufacturer Bendon has discovered. The result was supported by retailer Marks & Spencer, but a spokesman said it had only noticed the change in the past five years.
We've been watching with growing interest...
Experts suggested that the increase was due in part to the popularity of breast enhancement, and fitted into a pattern of women gradually getting bigger.
Global warming?

Results from the most recent National Sizing Survey, released last year, revealed that women's busts and hips had grown by 1Âœins since 1951. Waists had also grown by 6Âœins. But details about bra size had been kept confidential by retailers.
Victoria's Top Secret
Bendon also found that more than half of women were wearing ill-fitting bras, despite publicised information that this caused back pain and other problems. Fiona Walsh, an osteopath on the General Osteopathic Council, said: "Breasts are growing, not only as a result of women getting bigger generally, but across the board."
She said that bigger breasts could lead to a flattening of the upper spine. However, the right bra could alleviate back and neck pain.
We at Rantburg promise to look into this developing issue. At least when our wives aren't looking
Posted by:The Angry Fliegerabwehrkanonen

#9  I have read that the same pattern is occurring in the US. Speculation was that part of the increased bust size was related to general increased obesity, but that the 'disproportionate' increase in bust size might be related to the use of hormones in animal feed, transferred to people through meat, milk, eggs, etc.
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-08-15 23:12  

#8  ....and bountiful.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-15 22:29  

#7  GAWD IS IS INDEED GREAT AND MERCIFUL.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-08-15 17:55  

#6  b/c was .7 for both Audrey Hepburn and Marilyn Monroe. No comment on A.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-08-15 17:52  

#5  Now, this may just be me, but growth in regions A and C, welcome as they are, tend to be diminished in their aesthetic value by growth of area B.

Or, as I tell my non-discriminating brother: "Yeah, she's got bigguns - she's fat!"
Posted by: BH   2005-08-15 17:36  

#4  In 1951 women wore girdles. Now we don't, thank goodness! But the result in measured girth for outerwear is obvious.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-08-15 17:07  

#3  Let's hope the size of the average British male's hand is growing in proportion to, uh, that which it is intended to have a handful of. (Does that make sense?)
Posted by: Jonathan   2005-08-15 17:04  

#2  I believe the relevant unit of measurement is the British Standard Handful.
Posted by: Matt   2005-08-15 16:47  

#1  Does anyone else see the trouble here ?
Busts and hips increased by 1.5" but waists increased by 6.5". Thats over four times as much.

Now, this may just be me, but growth in regions A and C, welcome as they are, tend to be diminished in their aesthetic value by growth of area B.
Posted by: buwaya   2005-08-15 14:31  

00:00