You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
UN says British deportation plan may breach human rights
2005-08-24
GENEVA: A UN expert on torture and human rights on Tuesday expressed concern over Britain's plan to deport hardline Islamists to their countries of origin on the basis of assurances that they will not be abused or tortured there. Manfred Nowak, the UN special rapporteur on torture, said the deportation plans - part of a crackdown announced by Prime Minister Tony Blair in the aftermath of the London bomb attacks - could breach international human rights rules.
I take it there aren't international human rights rules against blowing people up?
In a statement, Nowak piously condemned all acts of terrorism, and extended his sympathy to the British government and the families of the victims of the July 7 London bombings.
That, and about $3.95 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks...
But he added: "The fact that such assurances are sought shows in itself that the sending country perceives a serious risk of the deportee being subjected to torture or ill treatment upon arrival in the receiving country. Diplomatic assurances are not an appropriate tool to eradicate this risk."
"Then what is?"
"Nothin' I can think of. Guess you gotta keep 'em!"
"And make sure they are receiving proper benefits from Her Majesty's Government. We don't want them all impoverished and in despair, turning to terror when they just can't take the injustice of their brothers in Palestine!"
A diplomatic assurance that a mook won't be tortured isn't good enough. A 'cross our hearts' diplomatic assurance that mad mullahs won't develop nuclear weapons, however, is good enough for all right-thinking people.
Ten foreigners were rounded up earlier this month in raids in London and other parts of Britain, and have been slated for deportation. They are said to include reputed Al Qaeda "ambassador" Abu Qatada, 44, from Jordan.
Posted by:Fred

#17  What does PETA say?
Posted by: gromgoru   2005-08-24 21:36  

#16  Manfred Nowak, the UN special rapporteur on torture....

What a title! Jeeze Louise, these guys are hopeless. *sigh*
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-08-24 20:25  

#15  I would speed up the deportation process if I was assured they would be abused and tortured in their Islamic homeland. Serves them right for preaching Jihad and sedition in Western nations
Posted by: sea cruise   2005-08-24 19:34  

#14  PlanetDan -- you caught me. I am a USC fan.

Yes, the ACLU is analogous to UN. They both want to get us killed.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-24 17:17  

#13  House arrest in the UN Compound. Its the only human solution.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-08-24 16:23  

#12  "We don't care what happens to them, as long as it happens somewhere else." say the Brits...
Posted by: mojo   2005-08-24 14:10  

#11  Maybe they can ship them all to Geneva to live with Manfred? I'll bet the UN digs there got plenty of room. He can teach them all to be butlers and servants...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-08-24 13:32  

#10  Ah, there we go. When I hear the word "expert" it is often code for idiotic whore.
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-08-24 11:25  

#9  A UN expert on torture and human rights on Tuesday expressed concern over Britain's plan to deport hardline Islamists to their countries of origin on the basis of assurances that they will not be abused or tortured there.

Somehow, I just can't muster up a lot of sympathy for Muslim extremists.....
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-08-24 10:29  

#8  A UN that still won't admit that "human rights" are being violated in Sudan.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-08-24 09:44  

#7  UCLA? Do you mean ACLU? Although must do admit, the UN is more or less like a bunch of frat boys.

Besides, isn't the UN too busy to worry about such things now that they're in the paleo printing business (today gaza, tomorrow the west bank and jerusalem")"
Posted by: PlanetDan   2005-08-24 08:58  

#6  ...serious risk of the deportee being subjected to torture or ill treatment upon arrival in the receiving country.

If the UN "experts" are so efficient, let them do something about the receiving countries. After all, they should be no worries, as the UK is not going to send any body to the USA...
Posted by: SwissTex   2005-08-24 08:41  

#5  Remember guys the U.N. has some of the foremost experts on human rights violations,"set a thief to catch a thief".
Posted by: raptor   2005-08-24 06:36  

#4  Keep in mind that this same UN is still befiddled to define what terrorism is.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-24 03:16  

#3  Laswt time I looked, those 52 people were still dead - what about *their* human rights Mr Nowak? Arsehole.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2005-08-24 01:29  

#2  What is the UN if not Diplomacy and agreements? So this guy admits the UN and it's agreements aren't worth warm spit. The UK may safely ignore said UN "agreements" they as they are equally invalid.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0´ Doom   2005-08-24 00:23  

#1  Are you sure the UN is not the UCLA and the UCLA is not the UN?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-24 00:11  

00:00