You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Economy
Molly Ivins: Katrina all Bush's fault
2005-09-01
AUSTIN, Texas -- Like many of you who love New Orleans, I find myself taking short mental walks there today, turning a familiar corner, glimpsing a favorite scene, square or vista. And worrying about the beloved friends and the city, and how they are now.

To use a fine Southern word, it's tacky to start playing the blame game before the dead are even counted.
And in the very next sentence, she sets the stage to lay blame.
It is not too soon, however, to make a point that needs to be hammered home again and again, and that is that government policies have real consequences in people's lives.

This is not "just politics" or blaming for political advantage. This is about the real consequences of what governments do and do not do about their responsibilities. And about who winds up paying the price for those policies.

This is a column for everyone in the path of Hurricane Katrina who ever said, "I'm sorry, I'm just not interested in politics," or, "There's nothing I can do about it," or, "Eh, they're all crooks anyway."

Nothing to do with me, nothing to do with my life, nothing I can do about any of it. Look around you this morning. I suppose the National Rifle Association would argue, "Government policies don't kill people, hurricanes kill people." Actually, hurricanes plus government policies kill people.

One of the main reasons New Orleans is so vulnerable to hurricanes is the gradual disappearance of the wetlands on the Gulf Coast that once stood as a natural buffer between the city and storms coming in from the water. The disappearance of those wetlands does not have the name of a political party or a particular administration attached to it. No one wants to play, "The Democrats did it," or, "It's all Reagan's fault." Many environmentalists will tell you more than a century's interference with the natural flow of the Mississippi is the root cause of the problem, cutting off the movement of alluvial soil to the river's delta.
And here comes the 'but ...', because it would never do to lay blame on Democrats, you see ...
But in addition to long-range consequences of long-term policies like letting the Corps of Engineers try to build a better river than God, there are real short-term consequences, as well. It is a fact that the Clinton administration set some tough policies on wetlands, and it is a fact that the Bush administration repealed those policies--ordering federal agencies to stop protecting as many as 20 million acres of wetlands.
None of which has anything to do with a Category 4 hurricane that blew down levees, but do prattle on, Molly ...
Last year, four environmental groups cooperated on a joint report showing the Bush administration's policies had allowed developers to drain thousands of acres of wetlands.

Does this mean we should blame President Bush for the fact that New Orleans is underwater?
She says no, but she means yes ...
No, but it means we can blame Bush when a Category 3 or Category 2 hurricane puts New Orleans under. At this point, it is a matter of making a bad situation worse, of failing to observe the First Rule of Holes (when you're in one, stop digging).
But she keeps digging in this column ...
Had a storm the size of Katrina just had the grace to hold off for a while, it's quite likely no one would even remember what the Bush administration did two months ago. The national press corps has the attention span of a gnat, and trying to get anyone in Washington to remember longer than a year ago is like asking them what happened in Iznik, Turkey, in A.D. 325.

Just plain political bad luck that, in June, Bush took his little ax and chopped $71.2 million from the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers, a 44 percent reduction. As was reported in New Orleans CityBusiness at the time, that meant "major hurricane and flood projects will not be awarded to local engineering firms. Also, a study to determine ways to protect the region from a Category 5 hurricane has been shelved for now."
Since there's no reasonable defense on a Cat 5 hurricane, the cancellation sounds like good stewardship.
The commander of the corps' New Orleans district also immediately instituted a hiring freeze and canceled the annual corps picnic.
Yes, a picnic would have saved New Orleans ...
Our bozo progressive friends at the Center for American Progress note the Office of Technology Assessment used to produce forward-thinking plans such as "Floods: A National Policy Concern" and "A Framework for Flood Hazards Management." Unfortunately, the office was targeted by Newt Gingrich and the Republican right, and gutted years ago.
They were real page-turners, too, worthy of Clancy and Ludlum ...
In fact, there is now a governmentwide movement away from basing policy on science, expertise and professionalism, and in favor of choices based on ideology. If you're wondering what the ideological position on flood management might be, look at the pictures of New Orleans--it seems to consist of gutting the programs that do anything.
You might wonder where that came from, but Molly has to get a shot at 'intelligent design' in, no matter how oblique ...
Unfortunately, the war in Iraq is directly related to the devastation left by the hurricane. About 35 percent of Louisiana's National Guard is now serving in Iraq, where four out of every 10 soldiers are guardsmen. Recruiting for the Guard is also down significantly because people are afraid of being sent to Iraq if they join, leaving the Guard even more short-handed.
Even though Gov. Blanco said that she had all the Guard help she needed ...
The Louisiana National Guard also notes that dozens of its high-water vehicles, Humvees, refuelers and generators have also been sent abroad. (I hate to be picky, but why do they need high-water vehicles in Iraq?)
Which leaves them plenty to be used in New Orleans. Plus -- and here's a surprise for Molly -- we can also mobilize the Guard from other states to help out.
This, in turn, goes back to the original policy decision to go into Iraq without enough soldiers and the subsequent failure to admit that mistake and to rectify it by instituting a draft.
And if the Bush administration had come out with a draft, the spittle would have reached flood stage.
The levees of New Orleans, two of which are now broken and flooding the city, were also victims of Iraq war spending. Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, said on June 8, 2004, "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq."
"Hey, only 3,000 people died in the WTC, nuttin' we can do now ..."
This, friends, is why we need to pay attention to government policies, not political personalities, and to know whereon we vote. It is about our lives.
Which is why I can't vote for Democrats any more ...
Posted by:Steve White

#10  Leftwing logic at work - more than a century's interference with the natural flow of the Mississippi (by the Army Corps of engineers) is the root cause of the problem. Which means its Bush's fault cos Bush took his little ax and chopped $71.2 million from the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-09-01 22:21  

#9  Molly is a spiteful bitch still pissed W won he governorship and presidency. Die soon, Molly, it'll raise the quality of life on the planet considerably
Posted by: Frank G   2005-09-01 21:57  

#8  Unfortunately one thing she is right about is the 100+ years of trying to control the course of the Mississippi that has resulted in a reduction of silt depostion in the delta and the resultant loss of wet lands.

Even if the Army Corps Of Engineers didn't try to control the direction of the Mississippi, New Orleans would still be living on borrowed time, because it's close to the Gulf, but just as important, it's still below sea level, things Molly just can't seem to get through her little skull. Even if the oh-so-precious wetlands were built back up, a hurricane's storm surge would probably just rush right over the low-lying areas to find ways to inundate New Orleans anyway. In the event of a hurricane taking dead aim at New Orleans, well,.....
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-09-01 16:11  

#7  These flaws in Bush's policies are going to destroy any chance he has of re-election.
Posted by: Curt Simon   2005-09-01 13:04  

#6  good ol' molly just needs short mental walks.
Posted by: macofromoc   2005-09-01 13:03  

#5  WE should just build a giant sci-fi dome that encloses the entire city of New Orleans. Then it can be air conditioned and comfortable and safe from hurricanes and floods and mosquitos and zombies and aligators. The dome should be built on a giant pair of legs so that it could walk to safety in the case of a worse case disaster.

We would have build such a dome by now if Bush's short sited policies had not distracted us. Bad bush, very bad bush.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-09-01 12:48  

#4  I hate to say this BUT, I don't care where you are in the WORLD, IF A CAT5 STORM is comming your way and there's a MANDITORY EVACUATION you LEAVE!!!! No matter if you walk,run, bike,taxi,bus,plane,or whatever mode of transportation you can get in or on, YOU LEAVE!!!!
MANDITORY means just that!! Now some people have to go in and collect a bunch of stupid dead people!!!
Posted by: ARMYGUY   2005-09-01 12:36  

#3  ...in June, Bush took his little ax...

So, between June and now they would have had a plan to protect the city from a hurrican like Katrina, right? Not just a plan, but a completed project, right? Hello?

...As was reported in New Orleans CityBusiness at the time, that meant "major hurricane and flood projects will not be awarded to local engineering firms...

Halliburton! Surely Ivins doesn't think public money should go to private companies?
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-09-01 12:10  

#2  Guys ... I don't remember the specific post, but I predicted that the demented morons on the Left would somehow, someway, blame Bush for Katrina. Its blame Bush all day, all night.

These idiots wish to blame Bush, fine. Let them have their fun. But if they blame America say after a second massive Al-Qaeda attack ...hmmmm ...can you see the return of sedition laws? Maybe an American Freikorps? I see dead people...
Posted by: The Angry Fliegerabwehrkanonen   2005-09-01 11:36  

#1  Unfortunately one thing she is right about is the 100+ years of trying to control the course of the Mississippi that has resulted in a reduction of silt depostion in the delta and the resultant loss of wet lands. So if she wants to blame Bush she had also be ready to blame other presidents including St. Franklin
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2005-09-01 11:17  

00:00