| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Tech |
| The New Prize: Alternative Fuels. E85 |
| 2005-09-11 |
| DETROIT, Sept. 9 - A week ago, Benjamin Kleber was spending $3.39 a gallon at a gasoline station in Maryland when he noticed an obscure decal on his minivan. "It's this sticker about the size of a business card that's stuck on the side of the gas flap that I never really paid attention to," said Mr. Kleber, a 25-year-old electrical engineer for a government contractor. The decal said he could be using E85, a fuel cocktail that consists mostly of grain alcohol, or corn-based ethanol, with a splash of gasoline. Production of ethanol fuel, much of it blended in small doses with regular gasoline, has doubled to more than three billion gallons in the last half decade. This year, propelled by rising gasoline prices, E85 is finding new life as an alternative fuel. It remains hard to find, to say the least, in part because many oil companies have no desire to put a competing product in stations that carry their banner. But the number of stations offering E85 has nearly doubled since January, to more than 460, mostly in corn-growing states like Minnesota. And because of incentives included in recently passed energy legislation, and the fact that E85 is now about 40 to 50 cents cheaper than a gallon of regular gasoline, E85 backers are expecting the surge to accelerate. Being an engineer, Mr. Kleber had heard of E85. And after spending $58 to fill his 1998 Plymouth Voyager with regular unleaded last Sunday - "staggering," he said - he went home and began to do some research. He discovered that a station nearby sold the fuel for $2.67 a gallon. At current prices that could save him more than $14 a fillup. So he decided he would switch to a fuel from the Midwest instead of the Mideast. What separates E85 is that more than four million American cars and trucks have the ability to run on it right now, even though the majority of people who own these so-called flex-fuel vehicles are not even aware of the ability. Already, Brazil has turned to ethanol en masse, though the fuel there is derived from the more prevalent local crop, sugarcane. Gregory J. Cobb recently replaced premium gasoline pumps at two of his five Indiana stations with E85. At one station near South Bend, he said, he was selling 24,000 gallons of E85 a month compared with the 1,700 gallons of premium gas he had been selling. In Madison, Wis., Rebecca Bell and her husband, Kevin, started using E85 in the last couple of weeks to fuel their Ford Explorer and their Chevy minivan. They have also started carpooling with neighbors. "I feel better that it's coming from the United States," said Ms. Bell, 34, a vice president of a veterinary drug company and a mother of three. Now, here are some of the catches. For starters, it's hard to find the stuff. There are roughly 180,000 gasoline stations nationwide and fewer than 500 with E85. And ethanol can take us only so far. Huge tracts of farmland would have to be converted to corn production to provide enough fuel for significant portions of the American automobile fleet. A recent study published in the journal BioScience forecast that for all cars and trucks to run on ethanol by 2048, "virtually the entire country, with the exception of cities, would be covered with corn plantations." Using more farmland to produce ethanol would also drive up food prices. And E85 cannot be transported through gasoline pipelines, because it sucks up grime and water. E85 is also less energy-dense than gasoline, so a driver goes a bit less far on a gallon. Its current cost advantage is dependent on a 43-cents-a-gallon subsidy, versus a roughly 40-cent tax on a gallon of gasoline. Environmentalists have generally viewed the rise of flex-fuel vehicles as a boondoggle for automakers, because they are afforded fuel economy credits for making them. The credits have had the effect of driving up oil consumption. Many consumers who buy flex-fuel vehicles are not even made aware of the capability. On the upside, ethanol is a domestic resource and most studies indicate that it reduces emissions of both smog-forming pollutants and global warming gases, the amount depending on how it is produced. An emerging process of creating ethanol from agricultural waste like cereal straw has the potential for far greater emissions reductions and more efficient land use. This so-called cellulose ethanol has much greater potential than current ethanol, said Michael Wang, a researcher at the Center for Transportation Research at the Argonne National Laboratory, but, he added, "the technology has not arrived." David Friedman, a senior analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, an environmental group, said, "ethanol has great potential to help the U.S. kick our oil habit, but that's 20 or 30 years away." "Corn ethanol can help in the short term, but it has serious limitations, and none of this is going to work if we don't dramatically improve the efficiency of our cars and trucks." |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #6 Another thing glossed over, after fermenting the alcohol, the corn yields a far MORE nutritious residue than the original corn, it's sold as cattle feed and cattle find it tastier as well,.. and straight ethanol makes a great brain fuel. |
| Posted by: Red Dog 2005-09-11 05:53 |
| #5 #3: Recent technical advances have brought ethanol to a point where it is considerably past break even in areas near both corn production and distilleries. Ummm, Corn is actually a poor crop for this alcohol conversion, Sugar Beets would yield more, I'm sure some farmers out there can come up with several alternate crops far better (Yield per acre) than Corn. I remember reading an article some years back listing about 10 field crops far better at alcohol production than Corn. Another thing glossed over, after fermenting the alcohol, the corn yields a far MORE nutritious residue than the original corn, it's sold as cattle feed and cattle find it tastier as well, it's not just used for fuel then trashed, dual usage reduces costs tremendously. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2005-09-11 02:02 |
| #4 Since we can't ship this year's crops out of New Orleans, IT MAKES SENSE for this year. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2005-09-11 01:02 |
| #3 Recent technical advances have brought ethanol to a point where it is considerably past break even in areas near both corn production and distillaries. In the rest of the country, it is still what Slate says it is. |
| Posted by: mhw 2005-09-11 01:01 |
| #2 I am not big on Slate as a credible source. Still, with high fuel prices more innovative alternatives will come on line. This will result, in effect, in bringing overall fuel prices down long-term. |
| Posted by: Captain America 2005-09-11 00:53 |
| #1 Ethanol requires more fossils fuels to produce than the fuel it delivers and consequently significantly increases fossil fuel imports and increases dependence. Ethanol fuels are just a disguised farm subsidy. This is a much better article. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2005-09-11 00:41 |