You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Karzai Calls for an End to Major Foreign Military Operations
2005-09-20
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - President Hamid Karzai on Tuesday challenged the need for major foreign military operations in Afghanistan, saying air strikes are no longer effective and that U.S.-led coalition forces should focus on rooting out terror bases and support networks. Karzai also demanded an immediate end to foreign troops searching people's homes without his government's authorization. "I don't think there is a big need for military activity in Afghanistan anymore," he told reporters in Kabul. "The nature of the war on terrorism in Afghanistan has changed now. "No coalition forces should go to Afghan homes without the authorization of the Afghan government. ... The use of air power is something that may not be very effective now."
If he's saying that the Afghan army and government are strong enough now to take on more of the effort, or at least to be equal partners in the effort, great. However, this just may be for domestic consumption.
In suggesting a new approach to fighting militants, Karzai said foreign governments should "concentrate on where terrorists are trained, on their bases, on the supply to them, on the money coming to them" - a veiled reference to alleged support that the militants get from neighboring Pakistan.
aka; "The country who's name we dare not speak", "The country to be named later", "The crater formerly known as Pakistan", etc
Afghan officials have repeatedly accused Pakistan of aiding Taliban rebels and other militants, a charge Islamabad vehemently denies.
"Nope, nope, no terrorists here. We've asked."
Karzai's comments came amid the biggest resurgence in Taliban violence since U.S.-led forces ousted the hard-line regime in 2001. More than 1,200 people have been killed in the past six months, many of them suspected rebels slain in coalition air strikes, according to information from Afghan and U.S. officials. The country held legislative elections Sunday, the final step toward democracy on a path laid out in 2001.

Just hours before Karzai spoke, coalition commander Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry warned that he expected "more fighting in the weeks ahead." "We are staying on the offensive against the enemies of Afghanistan, and we will continue that process throughout the fall and throughout the winter," Eikenberry told journalists. But Karzai played down the militant threat, saying, "We do not think a serious terrorist challenge is emanating from Afghanistan." The president did not specify whether he was referring to a threat from al-Qaida terrorists, Taliban rebels or both.
"I can say no more"
Posted by:Steve

#13  Karzai states the obvious. Not too long ago he addressed the real problem by complaining about the lack of, and diversion of, reconstruction funds.

The best pacification program would a massive, if relatively inexpensive agricultural program improved one generation above what they currently use. This would involve hiring a huge number of people to clear and prepare new land for agriculture, dig irrigation canals, and set up co-ops to run each section as a business, coordinated by the experts as what would be best for them to grow and how.

The idea is to create constructive, additive, labor intensive employment for vast numbers of people, and quickly. Tens of thousands of acres could be in production in a few months, creating a huge agribusiness infrastructure.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-09-20 19:21  

#12  Helicopters don't work too well at the altitudes encountered in the Hindu Kush. Maybe an upengined Apache?
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-09-20 18:41  

#11  The problem with that is that the average Afghan village has the knowledge, tools, and motivation to knock anything out of the air designed before 1980. Sure, maybe they have been "disarmed;" which only means they've oiled and buried their stuff in a cave somewhere. Afghans have forgotten more about hiding weapons than a NorCal survivalist will ever learn.

If I were the Afghan army I would simply skip having an airforce entirely except for helicopters and rely on a having a U.S. airbase. Safer and more cost effective that way.
Posted by: Secret Master   2005-09-20 16:56  

#10  Does anyone have any information on the state of the Afghan Air Force? I'll bet our AF generals can't understand why the Afghans don't want F-15s, when what they require are sturdy prop-engine cargo and ground attack aircraft.
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-09-20 16:41  

#9  One of my biggest fears is that the bad guys would get smart and go to ground, the US pulls out, then they come back.

The cost of the yo-yo effect politically and financially would be devistating. I was sure that was Saddam's game. So far we've been lucky that our enemies aren't really that bright.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-09-20 15:00  

#8  But, but.... the MSM says its a quagmire!
Posted by: Secret Master   2005-09-20 14:17  

#7  I sure hoped we've mapped every inch of this country, so that if we leave too soon, we can do our damage from battleships next time.

That would take one hell of a battleship.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-09-20 14:13  

#6   "concentrate on where terrorists are trained, on their bases, on the supply to them, on the money coming to them" -
Makes sense to me,tell perv"Lead,follow or get the hell out of the way".
Posted by: raptor   2005-09-20 14:05  

#5  Move all the troops over towards Iran. Just to say howdy.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2005-09-20 12:43  

#4  This is all reasonable and good.
Posted by: Darrell   2005-09-20 12:35  

#3  "The crater formerly known as Pakistan"

Heh.
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-09-20 12:16  

#2  I sure hoped we've mapped every inch of this country, so that if we leave too soon, we can do our damage from battleships next time.
Posted by: plainslow   2005-09-20 12:03  

#1  If the Afghans want to take over, then more power to them.
Posted by: ed   2005-09-20 11:07  

00:00