You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Rock the Dubya
2005-09-29
... The Stones have put themselves on the front pages without putting themselves under fire because denouncing neocons allows them to be edgy without going over the edge. As recent history has shown, this is the surest and safest way to rescue one's fading career from permanent decline. Nowadays, Bush bashing is the last refuge of the has-been scoundrel, the panacea for pop stars of the past.

Over the last three years, one band after another, each presumably aware of its decline, has jumped on the anti-Bush bandwagon. To prove that they are healed, aging hipsters must first prove that they are sick — sick, anyway, of the war and President Bush. As long as they are still singing, they figure, the fat lady won't be. As the president's popularity has declined, along with public support for the war, Bush bashing has become more common, acceptable, and fashionable. And as demand has increased, so has supply.

Three years ago, we saw the first signs of the "aging hipster" syndrome when Steve Earle released a song called "John Walker's Blues," in which he laments the fate of the American Taliban. This song was followed by "The Revolution Starts... Now", an entire album dedicated to — or more precisely, against — George W. Bush.
Posted by:Fred

#4   Having already received the attention they wanted, the Stones subsequently backed off from the chance to create any further controversy. They didn't need it...

what I meant to say but didn't say well was... this sounds like fear from plummeting record sales rather than some sort of brilliant strategy.
Posted by: 2b   2005-09-29 20:37  

#3  This article is a hoot, but the author is obviously a lefty in grasping denial that the Stones, the Chix, etc. were dumped by the public as a direct consequence of their anti-American/Bush stance.

For other musicians resisting a fate of obscurity, the lesson ... was that the fate of the Dixie Chicks was not the inevitable result of antiwar or anti-Bush criticism.

yes it was. They alienated their "country music" fans, including me.

As the president's popularity has declined, along with public support for the war, Bush bashing has become more common, acceptable, and fashionable. And as demand has increased, so has supply.

wrong again. Just cause this is a fun article doesn't make this statement true. It's only true in the author's mind.

Also, it doesn't sound to me like the Stones got their attention but backed off, but realized the bombing of their records sales was a direct consequence of Neocon.

Sugar coating it may make the medicine go down smoother but the reality is that they tried to boost their fading popularity with Bush bashing and it backfired in a big way.
Posted by: 2b   2005-09-29 20:35  

#2  Wow. Steve Earle? Yeah, his career's just skyrocketed...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-09-29 18:54  

#1  Is it possible they actually believe this stuff as opposed to walking through some elaborate commercial charade. The most spot-on thing about Spinal Tap (sorry, couldn't find an umlaut) was how stupid they were.
Posted by: VAMark   2005-09-29 17:42  

00:00