You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Syria regime change in world’s interest: Israel
2005-10-15
JERUSALEM - Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said on Friday it was in the world’s interest to have a regime change in Syria, which he accused of being “up to its neck” in terror. “Our interest is to tell the world that Syria is implicated up to its earlobes neck in terrorism, a terrorism that is directed not just against Israel but against coalition forces in Iraq,” he told public radio.

“And this is why it is in the interest of the entire world that there is another state in Syria, one that is freer and more democratic,” said Shalom.

Asked whether he believed that the end was nigh for Assad’s regime, Shalom said that only time would tell. “The future will tell us if this regime is close to the end or not. But there is no doubt that Assad has achieved something amazing: uniting the whole world against Syria,” said Israel’s top diplomat.

Shalom stressed that Israel would avoid becoming embroiled in the political turmoil of its northern neighbour. “Israel has no intention of getting involved in what is happening over there as the entire international community is already on the case.”
"We'll just start the snowball rolling down the hill and see what happens."
Posted by:Steve White

#6  For the official Foreign Minister of a government to say this is news. How often did the US Secretary of State openly say that changing the communist regime in Moscow would be in the world's interest? I'll bet "zero" is a good approximation.

Posted by: Jackal   2005-10-15 20:25  

#5  Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom: Certified Master of the Obvious
Posted by: Glineth Angereper9210   2005-10-15 15:18  

#4  Syria regime change in world’s interest

You call this news?!? Since when has this not been the case for the last umpteen years? Yes, the power vacuum is a serious issue. More important is the consistent, demonstrable, rapid and irreversible dismantling of all players in the terrorism line-up.

Those who doubt this should go back to yesterday's articles and read, "When Devils Walked the Earth."

Kill all apocalyptic terrorists and their supporters immediately.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-10-15 14:46  

#3  I'm with AP- easier to rid the head than the entrenched Syrian Baathists in the Gov't and the military. It can be done, but prolly not without invasion and killin'
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-15 14:30  

#2  The big question will be what will replace the Ass-hat regime? Syria gets its allowance from Iran and who else? Unless there is a big public people's revolution, the financers will drop Assad like maggoty bread and find another group. Also the Syrian army and other thugs will have something to say about it. Things will get worse before they get better. My 2 cents.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-10-15 14:05  

#1  Question:
Lebanon is going democratic
If Syria falls ...
Aren't the mad mullahs a bit isolated with only Bosnia and Kosovo with Iranian Revolutionary Guards?

Or is this a totally different thing and the IRG keep functioning in Leb, and Syria?

Just curious.
Posted by: 3dc   2005-10-15 13:00  

00:00