Submit your comments on this article |
Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
Israel cuts contacts with Paleos after attacks |
2005-10-17 |
Israel suspended contacts with the Palestinian Authority on Monday and slapped tough travel restrictions on the West Bank after Palestinian The Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat called the shootings "unfortunate Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev initially said all contacts with the Palestinian Authority had been halted, but later said this applied only to committees on specific issues, such as prisoner releases, security and customs at border crossings. "In Israel, we have no desire to return to a reality of daily attacks against Israeli civilians," Regev said. "We want to send a very strong and sharp message to the Palestinians, and the temporary suspension of talks is that message." Israel also responded with tough new measures limiting movement in the West Bank, security officials said, adding that the restrictions would be in place for a long time. The West Bank towns of Hebron and Bethlehem, closest to the Gush Etzion attack, were sealed, and private Palestinian-owned cars were barred from the West Bank's main north-south road. Security officials said Israel is planning to impose permanent traffic separation in the West Bank, with Israeli motorists using main highways and Palestinians largely forced to The decisions to restrict movement in the West Bank were made at high-level consultations led by Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz. They reversed a relaxing of restrictions gradually implemented since a February cease-fire. The limitations, in place for most of the past five years of fighting, crippled the Palestinian economy and caused widespread hardships. And money skimmed off by Arafat had nothing to do with it. Israel has demanded the Palestinians dismantle In the first attack, The second attack took place near the settlement of Eli in the northern area of the West Bank. Rescue services said one Israeli was seriously wounded. Also Sunday, Israeli troops killed an Islamic Jihad |
Posted by:Jackal |
#8 With the handover completed, all further attacks should result in slight but increasing deviations in how far remaining sections of the wall encroach upon Palestinian terrortories. For each attack, another acre of land is taken. For each death, ten acres are absorbed. Perhaps, when the Palestinians have lost all the land they gained they will begin to reconsider the wisdom of their perfidy. If the fence is completed and the attacks continue, then it is time to begin securing Jerusalem one block at a time. The only thing held precious by the Palestinians is their land. Take it from them and may they rot in everlasting hell. |
Posted by: Zenster 2005-10-17 19:57 |
#7 With the handover completed, all further attacks should result in slight but increasing deviations in how far remaining sections of the wall encroach upon Palestinian terrortories. For each attack, another acre of land is taken. For each death, ten acres are absorbed. Perhaps, when the Palestinians have lost all the land they gained they will begin to reconsider the wisdom of their perfidy. If the fence is completed and the attacks continue, then it is time to begin securing Jerusalem one block at a time. The only thing held precious by the Palestinians is their land. Take it from them and may they rot in everlasting hell. |
Posted by: Zenster 2005-10-17 19:52 |
#6 Ptah, it took me a long time to get to the place you were in 2003. But after reading your linked post, I shall engrave "No Peace, No Land" in gold upon my heart. Thank you. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2005-10-17 17:05 |
#5 No Peace, No Land. |
Posted by: Ptah 2005-10-17 16:17 |
#4 Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat called the shootings "unfortunate" and accused the gunmen of trying to sabotage efforts to revive peace talks. He urged Israel to reconsider the travel restrictions and suspension of contacts, saying "angry messages, collective punishment and violence will just add to the complexities." They were only Jews after all......right Saeb? |
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-10-17 15:30 |
#3 "Involvement of terrorists gunmen with ties to Fatah in Sunday's attacks would underscore his failure to impose control." Freudian slip (or something)? - When I first read that sentence I read it as "undercut his failure to impose control." |
Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-10-17 14:51 |
#2 Sounding more and more like a DEEE EYE VEEE OHHHHHH ARE CEEEEEEE EEE |
Posted by: Tammuah 2005-10-17 12:22 |
#1 If the Isrealis just forcfully expelled the Paleo's out of a brorder town with Isreal proper in responce with a statement that every attack will equal more loss of territory cosiquences are a bitch. A small town to start with but as the attacks continue step it up to larger and larger solidify the border along the disputed areas. At some point the Paleo's would either get the point and quit or thier would be no more left in the W bank. How things are currently going why should the Paleo's quit attacking the Isrealis, they have given them S. Lebanon, Gaza, A a paper Paleo State, a regular army cough state terrorist, huge amounts of EU economic aid and recognition, damm if it was you would you stop? I would be stepping it up. |
Posted by: C-Low 2005-10-17 09:46 |