You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US sees possible drop in troops in Iraq from 2006
2005-10-27
WASHINGTON - The US ambassador to Iraq said on Wednesday that political progress and improving home-grown security forces there may allow the United States to cut its military presence in 2006. “I do believe it’s possible that we could adjust our forces, downsizing them in the course of next year. That’s possible given the positive political development and the continuing growth in the credibility of the Iraqi forces,” Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said at the White House.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Nonsense. The American people were prepared to continue support for the Viet Nam war until Johnson caved. They'll keep supporting this one. Taxes, spending, the economy, gas prices and immigration are all much more important to the 2006 elections. The donks will have a big issue and the MSM will bury us in coverage, but that's going to happen regardless of how many troops are "drawn down". And it won't change enough votes to make a difference.
Posted by: Claimble Sperese9105   2005-10-27 16:55  

#4  If we don't have at least a 20k drawdown by the 2006 elections, the donks will have a big, big issue.
Posted by: mhw   2005-10-27 16:42  

#3  The true quagmire is within Democrat political circles. Hence the projection into Iraq, Katrina, and the media.
Posted by: john   2005-10-27 10:21  

#2  But it's still a quagmire, right? Quackmire! Quackmire!

And what about the brutal Afghan winter? How will we ever cope with that? Oh, wait! That was the last quagmire. Never mind.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-10-27 09:33  

#1  Gosh, that's almost like common sense, y'know? Mebbe he should sit down with General Skeery and explain it to him.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-27 01:49  

00:00