You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
‘Iran not afraid of war, sanctions’
2005-10-31
TEHERAN - Iran is unfazed by the threat of war or sanctions over its disputed nuclear programme and mounting international pressure has only hardened its resolve, a senior official said on Monday. “They must understand that such an attitude will only persuade us more to have nuclear technology,” said top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, responding to widespread condemnation of comments by President Mahmoud Ahmadinjad.

“There won’t be a war. They do not have the means to go to war on two fronts,” Larijani was quoted as saying by the student news agency ISNA in a reference to the continued hostilities faced by US-led forces in neighbouring Iraq. “Iran is a hard target,” insisted Larijani, who was addressing a seminar on nuclear energy. “If they think they can limit us by oil sanctions or other sanctions, they are wrong. Oil sanctions will only increase the price of oil,” he warned. “Iran has not concealed anything,” Larijani insisted. “We agree that the agency can conduct any kind of inspection to make sure that Iran is not deviating from peaceful nuclear technology.”

But he charged that diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis were being undermined by “a kind of American fascism”, adding: “I do not consider negotiations the only way for the nuclear issue, although they are the first priority”.

A team of IAEA inspectors is currently in Iran as part of the UN watchdog’s two-and-a-half-year-old investigation of its nuclear programme, and another senior Iranian nuclear official said they had made “remarkable progress”. Mohammad Saeedi, the deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, said Iran had recently submitted documents related to P1 and P2 centrifuges -- devices used to enrich uranium to make fuel but which can also be used to make the core of a weapon.
“Some of the documents will be submitted during the inspections,” he was quoted as saying, adding the IAEA team would be in the country until Wednesday.
Posted by:Steve

#5  REGIME CHANGE IRAN.com had an interesting arty yesterday - seems the MSM/Leftmedia forgot to display a promo that Mad Moud was standing next to when he made his "Israel Must be Wiped Off the Map" comment. Showed a broken/cracked globe repres the USA at the bottom of a glass while a globe = Israel was still falling thru the air. THE MESSAGE IS CLEAR - FOR ISRAEL TO BE DESTROYED AMERICA MUST BE DESTROYED FIRST!? A good argument can also be made that the "America globe" also represents the WEST, WESTERN DEMOCRACY/VALUES, and of course JUDEO-XTIANITY. IFF THE COMMIE MAOISTS ARE WORKING WITH ASIATIC RADICAL GROUPS, AND BY MOST REPORTS HAD BEEN SINCE CLINTON'S SECOND TERM, WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT 9-11 AND THE COMMUNISTS -eeeerrrrr, meant DE-REGULATED/COMPETITIVE FASCISTS-CONSERVATIVES, etal.!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-10-31 19:22  

#4  What's Sistani saying about all this going on?
Posted by: Penguin   2005-10-31 14:42  

#3  If you ask me we are already at war with Iran through their proxies in Iraq. So if we were to move our forces from Iraq and Afghanistan into Iran it would simply be taking the battle to the enemy's ground. We have (or should have been) at war since the Iran hostage crisis when Iran violated our embassy.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-10-31 14:20  

#2  Centcom still deciding whether to withdraw from Iraq through Damascus or Tehran. Keep yer yap shut, Mahmoud, yer moving up the list.
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-10-31 14:16  

#1  â€œThere won’t be a war. They do not have the means to go to war on two fronts..."

Damn straight!
Posted by: Hideki Tojo   2005-10-31 14:04  

00:00