| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Revisionist History |
| 2005-11-17 |
| My latest via the Weekly Standard. LAST WEEK'S BOMBINGS in Amman, apparently carried out by Iraqi suicide bombers loyal to Abu Musab Zarqawi, have led to a new round of discussions in both the Western and Arab press as to whether or not the Iraqi insurgency is branching out into other parts of the Middle East. While much of this debate has been useful, many analysts, in their eagerness to criticize the Iraq War, have obfuscated the actual context in which the bombings took place. It has been suggested that (1) Zarqawi was not aligned with al Qaeda prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq; and (2) This is the first time that Iraqi nationals have been involved in international terrorism or jihadist causes. These memes are popular among both analysts and the press. They are also demonstrably false. Amidst the reporting on the Amman bombings, the Associated Press noted this anecdote with regard to the Radisson SAS hotel, one of the buildings targeted by the suicide bombers: "U.S. officials believe al-Zarqawi and bin Laden operations chief Abu Zubaydah were chief organizers of a foiled plot to bomb the Radisson SAS. The attack was to take place during millennium celebrations, but Jordanian authorities stopped it in late 1999." If this is the case, then the bombing of the Radisson SAS and the two other Amman hotels last week should not be seen so much as an outgrowth of the Iraqi insurgency as much as a tell-tale al Qaeda modus operandi: continuing to target a given location until the attack is carried out successfully (recall the 1993 World Trade Center bombing). Moreover, Zarqawi's close collaboration with senior al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah in the 1999 plot is another problem for intelligence analysts, counterterrorism officials, and diplomats have claimed for three years--despite the evidence to the contrary--that Zarqawi operated separately of or in opposition to bin Laden prior to the fall of 2004. Some have gone even further, claiming that it was the U.S. invasion of Iraq which brought the two terrorists together. Yet such a position defies logic given that the first public mention of Zarqawi was his original indictment in connection with the 1999 plot, where he is listed in Jordanian court records under his real name, Ahmad al-Khalialah (Ahmed al-Khalayleh), alongside senior al Qaeda leaders Zein Al Abiddeen Hassan (Zain al-Abd Din Hassan, the real name of Abu Zubaydah), Omar Mahmoud Abu Omar (Sheikh Abu Qatada, later described by Spanish authorities as bin Laden's ambassador in Europe), and Louay al-Sakkah (Louai Sakra), who was arrested over the summer in connection with a plot to attack Israeli cruise ships in Turkey. All of this information is available in the public record, but it has been substantially underreported. |
| Posted by:Dan Darling |
| #4 Mid-90's? Reagan? Eisenhower? No, no! Nixon! ChimpHilter? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2005-11-17 21:48 |
| #3 Every serious discussion of Zarqawi should mention that fact that he was in Jordanian custody at one time in the mid 90s and was released (almost certainly with American knowledge, probably with US permission and possibly at the request of the US.)I forget who was president then. |
| Posted by: mhw 2005-11-17 08:34 |
| #2 Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) could be termed the "Shadow Affliction" for its power to cloud men's minds. |
| Posted by: doc 2005-11-17 07:53 |
| #1 As I recall the Jordanians also have outlined a pretty good time line on Zarqs trips to prison, Afganistan and Iraq before 9/11. [his guru too] thanks for the link about Mahmdouh Mahmud Salim. The revisionist sould be forced to explain and prove why Saddam's apparat wouldn't know almost every bad actor and plot going on in the ME. His own son Odai, ran his father's Fedayeen..etc. |
| Posted by: Red Dog 2005-11-17 03:49 |