You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Japan's Ruling Party Unveils Plans to Establish Armed Forces
2005-11-23
Japan's ruling party unveiled plans to revise its constitutional commitment to pacifism and allow the country to establish armed forces "for self defence". The proposals would end Japan's renunciation of the right to maintain an army, as enshrined in the constitution imposed by America after the Second World War.

The Liberal Democratic Party has spent years drafting a revision of the post-war constitution to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the party's founding. The party has dominated the country since it was set up, ruling Japan for the past century save for a period of a few months.

The new draft keeps the commitment to peace but recognises the military as crucial to maintaining it. In the 240,000-strong Self Defence Forces, Japan already has a military in all but name. But constitutional revision would regularise its status, sweep away restrictions and enable it to play a bigger role. The defence minister would also be upgraded to a member of the cabinet. A clear legal basis would be created for non-combat missions overseas, such as reconstruction in Iraq and logistical support for the American-led war in Afghanistan.

Any move away from pacifism is likely to be viewed with suspicion in Asian countries that suffered from Japanese aggression in the Second World War. But a majority of Japanese feels that such fears are overblown and that Japan has the right to become a "normal country" with normal military forces.

Constitutional revision will be resisted by Japan's small communist and socialist parties. But it is expected to pass through parliament with the necessary two thirds majority because of backing from the main opposition party, the Democrats, and the LDP. It must then be approved in a referendum.
Posted by:Pappy

#21  Or the Japanese could buy some of the Marine Iwo Jima Class ships --- although the name could be an issue :)
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2005-11-23 22:20  

#20  Well, if they do not like nuke carriers, maybe the Japanese can use a couple of diesels that run large container ships, like THIS . There may be performance issues, as carrier missions are different than hauling containers, mere details to be worked out.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-11-23 22:09  

#19  Hey, these days; we've got to trust somebody! I say, quietly sell 'em a couple of LHD Class Gators for starters. Let them decide which deck-load works best ($). Luv those good ol' untested LHA/LHD posibilities! Hope every one is enjoying a sober, pre-Thanksgiving evening...
Posted by: Asymmetrical Triangulation   2005-11-23 21:35  

#18  Essentially great good news. This is the exact slap-in-the-face that China needs regarding their own fostering of the North Korean threat. Next step is Japan arming itself with nuclear weapons. China can suck hind tit.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-11-23 16:50  

#17  You refer to the famed "Broadway show tunes" commercial, of course.

Yes Mike, that one. lol!
Posted by: Pappy   2005-11-23 16:13  

#16  I wonder if it might not be something along the lines of the modernized Coral Sea/Midways using gas turbines.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-11-23 14:00  

#15  Pappy:

You refer to the famed "Broadway show tunes" commercial, of course.
Posted by: Mike   2005-11-23 12:11  

#14  Hello Kitty? Too expensive? Hmmm... How about lots of these, instead? Just funnin'...
Posted by: .com   2005-11-23 12:05  

#13  After that one recruiting commercial, anything is possible... ;)
Posted by: Pappy   2005-11-23 11:57  

#12  If Japan bought the Kitty Hawk, would they rename her Kitty-chan? :-)
Posted by: Mike   2005-11-23 11:56  

#11  No. The Kitty is old and would suck up too much of the JMSDF's resources. Likely it'll be something along the lines of the Osumi class amphibious assault ships.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-11-23 11:55  

#10  Actually, the Japanese could probably buy the Kitty Hawk, now that it is being retired. The only reason we kept an oil-fired carrier was because of Japanese sensitivities about nuke boats.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2005-11-23 11:27  

#9  Ok, then how about Kaga, Soryu, or Hiryu? :)
Posted by: Thomock Clamble2028   2005-11-23 11:26  

#8  I wonder what sort of CV Japan would design?

I'm betting they'd start out small, a jump jet carrier on the order of HMS Invincible.

Just hope they don't name her Akagi. That'd get people nervous.
Posted by: Mike   2005-11-23 08:29  

#7  I wonder what sort of CV Japan would design? They've plenty of experience with them and have been paying attention for the last 60 years.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-11-23 07:23  

#6  If Japan's nieghbors are shook about an amendment to the constitution,just wait till they lay the keel for thier first carrier,
Posted by: raptor   2005-11-23 06:07  

#5  thanks for the heads up Mr. Mahou, btw what makes you feel that we can read that good?

'just askin ;)
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-11-23 01:36  

#4  I'll proof read next time No Japan should read Now Japan.
Posted by: Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu   2005-11-23 01:26  

#3  60 year of Pacificism has paid off.No Japan needs to be able to defend it's self. No big thing.
Posted by: Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu   2005-11-23 01:24  

#2  Then they really need to sit down and have a chat with North Korea about inspiring this latest development.
Posted by: Phil   2005-11-23 00:49  

#1  One thing the nations of Asia agree about, they all hate the Japanese.
Posted by: gromky   2005-11-23 00:23  

00:00