Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Japan's Ruling Party Unveils Plans to Establish Armed Forces |
2005-11-23 |
Japan's ruling party unveiled plans to revise its constitutional commitment to pacifism and allow the country to establish armed forces "for self defence". The proposals would end Japan's renunciation of the right to maintain an army, as enshrined in the constitution imposed by America after the Second World War. The Liberal Democratic Party has spent years drafting a revision of the post-war constitution to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the party's founding. The party has dominated the country since it was set up, ruling Japan for the past century save for a period of a few months. The new draft keeps the commitment to peace but recognises the military as crucial to maintaining it. In the 240,000-strong Self Defence Forces, Japan already has a military in all but name. But constitutional revision would regularise its status, sweep away restrictions and enable it to play a bigger role. The defence minister would also be upgraded to a member of the cabinet. A clear legal basis would be created for non-combat missions overseas, such as reconstruction in Iraq and logistical support for the American-led war in Afghanistan. Any move away from pacifism is likely to be viewed with suspicion in Asian countries that suffered from Japanese aggression in the Second World War. But a majority of Japanese feels that such fears are overblown and that Japan has the right to become a "normal country" with normal military forces. Constitutional revision will be resisted by Japan's small communist and socialist parties. But it is expected to pass through parliament with the necessary two thirds majority because of backing from the main opposition party, the Democrats, and the LDP. It must then be approved in a referendum. |
Posted by:Pappy |
#21 Or the Japanese could buy some of the Marine Iwo Jima Class ships --- although the name could be an issue :) |
Posted by: Shieldwolf 2005-11-23 22:20 |
#20 Well, if they do not like nuke carriers, maybe the Japanese can use a couple of diesels that run large container ships, like THIS . There may be performance issues, as carrier missions are different than hauling containers, mere details to be worked out. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2005-11-23 22:09 |
#19 Hey, these days; we've got to trust somebody! I say, quietly sell 'em a couple of LHD Class Gators for starters. Let them decide which deck-load works best ($). Luv those good ol' untested LHA/LHD posibilities! Hope every one is enjoying a sober, pre-Thanksgiving evening... |
Posted by: Asymmetrical Triangulation 2005-11-23 21:35 |
#18 Essentially great good news. This is the exact slap-in-the-face that China needs regarding their own fostering of the North Korean threat. Next step is Japan arming itself with nuclear weapons. China can suck hind tit. |
Posted by: Zenster 2005-11-23 16:50 |
#17 You refer to the famed "Broadway show tunes" commercial, of course. Yes Mike, that one. lol! |
Posted by: Pappy 2005-11-23 16:13 |
#16 I wonder if it might not be something along the lines of the modernized Coral Sea/Midways using gas turbines. |
Posted by: Shipman 2005-11-23 14:00 |
#15 Pappy: You refer to the famed "Broadway show tunes" commercial, of course. |
Posted by: Mike 2005-11-23 12:11 |
#14 Hello Kitty? Too expensive? Hmmm... How about lots of these, instead? Just funnin'... |
Posted by: .com 2005-11-23 12:05 |
#13 After that one recruiting commercial, anything is possible... ;) |
Posted by: Pappy 2005-11-23 11:57 |
#12 If Japan bought the Kitty Hawk, would they rename her Kitty-chan? :-) |
Posted by: Mike 2005-11-23 11:56 |
#11 No. The Kitty is old and would suck up too much of the JMSDF's resources. Likely it'll be something along the lines of the Osumi class amphibious assault ships. |
Posted by: Pappy 2005-11-23 11:55 |
#10 Actually, the Japanese could probably buy the Kitty Hawk, now that it is being retired. The only reason we kept an oil-fired carrier was because of Japanese sensitivities about nuke boats. |
Posted by: Shieldwolf 2005-11-23 11:27 |
#9 Ok, then how about Kaga, Soryu, or Hiryu? :) |
Posted by: Thomock Clamble2028 2005-11-23 11:26 |
#8 I wonder what sort of CV Japan would design? I'm betting they'd start out small, a jump jet carrier on the order of HMS Invincible. Just hope they don't name her Akagi. That'd get people nervous. |
Posted by: Mike 2005-11-23 08:29 |
#7 I wonder what sort of CV Japan would design? They've plenty of experience with them and have been paying attention for the last 60 years. |
Posted by: Shipman 2005-11-23 07:23 |
#6 If Japan's nieghbors are shook about an amendment to the constitution,just wait till they lay the keel for thier first carrier, |
Posted by: raptor 2005-11-23 06:07 |
#5 thanks for the heads up Mr. Mahou, btw what makes you feel that we can read that good? 'just askin ;) |
Posted by: Red Dog 2005-11-23 01:36 |
#4 I'll proof read next time |
Posted by: Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu 2005-11-23 01:26 |
#3 60 year of Pacificism has paid off.No Japan needs to be able to defend it's self. No big thing. |
Posted by: Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu 2005-11-23 01:24 |
#2 Then they really need to sit down and have a chat with North Korea about inspiring this latest development. |
Posted by: Phil 2005-11-23 00:49 |
#1 One thing the nations of Asia agree about, they all hate the Japanese. |
Posted by: gromky 2005-11-23 00:23 |