You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Gay couples prepare to get hitched in Britain
2005-12-06
Gay and lesbian couples in Britain began officially registering their plans to tie the knot under a historic new law that came into effect on Monday. Tens of thousands of same-sex couples are expected to sign so-called civil partnerships over the next five years alone, giving them basically the same rights and responsibilities as their married, heterosexual counterparts. The new law, which was passed in November last year, enables gay couples to benefit from a dead partner’s pension, grant next-of-kin rights in hospitals and exempt them from inheritance tax on a partner’s home. The Act does not use the term “gay marriage” but civil partnerships have been designed to be as close to a marriage contract as possible.

Partners will even be able to dissolve the agreement in a form of divorce. To make a civil partnership, a couple must register their intent, wait a compulsory 15 days and then go to a register office or other authorised place. There they sign an official civil partnership document in front of a registrar and two witnesses. The ceremony is much like a civil wedding. Anticipation about the new law coming into force has been building in recent weeks. It even has a showbiz element. Pop star Elton John and his longstanding partner David Furnish intend to be among the first to sign up in December. George Michael has also announced his impending “marriage” to his companion Kenny Goss.
Posted by:Fred

#8  troll
Posted by: Red Dog   2005-12-06 19:58  

#7  Next: hetero same sex marriages so everyone else can get the financial and governmental benefits previously reserved for those who propagated the species in order to continue the society.

Financial and governmental benefits to parents are *additional* to the financial and governmental benefits that all married couples share.

In most of the western world it's been a long while since lack of children (or inability to have such) was considered grounds to pronounce a marriage invalid AFAIK.

But let me ask if the complaint you voice is really the point of your objection: would you for example disagree with having these civil partnerships apply to those homosexual couples that *do* agree to either adopt children or have them via other means (artificial insemination, etc, etc)?

DepotGuy> Same-Sex only. I guess some "exclusionary" laws are acceptable after all. Hypocrite bastards!

Don't play dumb. That "civil partnerships" was established for same-sex couples, instead of simply extending "marriage" to such, was not something that the gay rights community desired. The gay rights community would very much prefer if "marriage" was applicable to both gay and straight couples.

The "separate but equal" attitude that this civil partnership law portrays is merely an improvement of the old attitude of "both separate and UNEQUAL".
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2005-12-06 19:41  

#6  and I thought married people were only producing children because they wanted them and because of their numbers got some "pork".

Can you send your child round on tuesdays to do the dishes?

The answer, of course, is to set the tax system up so no group or individual is priviledged and everyone takes responsibility for their own actions (AMAP).
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2005-12-06 12:21  

#5  Next: hetero same sex marriages so everyone else can get the financial and governmental benefits previously reserved for those who propagated the species in order to continue the society.
Posted by: Cravitle Elmeremp2989   2005-12-06 11:23  

#4  Same-Sex only.

I guess some "exclusionary" laws are acceptable after all. Hypocrite bastards!
Posted by: DepotGuy   2005-12-06 10:45  

#3  I bet the divorce lawyers are thrilled by this.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-12-06 10:31  

#2  that was bad CH LOL

I bet Andy Sullivan dresses up in his new Manolos in celebration today!
Posted by: Frank G   2005-12-06 09:41  

#1  Personally I don't care what they do aa long as they don't try and force anything down my throat
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2005-12-06 08:49  

00:00