You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Rabbani backs Qanooni for speaker of Afghan House
2005-12-21
Less than 24 hours after inauguration Afghanistan's parliament faces its first challenge with today's election of Speaker. Former president Sibgatullah Mojadeddi was yesterday elected as chairman of the Upper House, the Senate.
Sibgatullah is one of those ineffectual guys that everybody can agree on because he doesn't have a mob...
But today's contest pits former president Burhanuddin Rabbani, an ethnic Tajik, backing failed presidential candidate Younus Qanooni against dreaded Pashtun leader Abdul Rasul Sayyaf.
I'd go with Qanooni without hesitation if I was Karzai. Rasool Sayyaf is a creature of the Saudis, a slippery deal maker who'd sell out his Mom and probably give a discount. Qanooni did a right fine job as interior minister during the transition period. He was a follower of Masood, and I think he's a man of caliber in his own right. His disadvantage in politix is being a Tadjik.
In a race already marred by charges of vote buying at $600 a vote, factions have forged new alliances that shed ethnic differences for political gain. Sayyaf is accused by rights groups of human rights violations in the civil war that followed the end of the 10-year Soviet occupation in 1989.
In this case they're right...
Abdul Sayyaf's comrade is former Qanooni ally, Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq, the fierce Hazara leader who heads Hizb-e-Wahdat, with whom Abdul Sayyaf's forces once clashed. Like Sayyaf, he is accused of rights abuses during the 1992-96 civil war that killed 50,000 people in Kabul.
Mohaqiq leads a Shia faction. I can't see him getting along really well with Rasool's Salafists. But I believe Iran owns him, so maybe that accounts for it.
Qanooni won over Ahmad Shah Massood's faction and Uzbek strongman Rashid Dostum. The mujahideen hero, married to a Pashtun, hopes to woo Pashtuns, former mujahideen and first time women lawmakers. Shukria Barakzai, one of 68 women parliamentarians could eat into his vote.
She's a Pashtun, I believe, but she's a female, which makes her a Pashtun of little consequence. And she's closest thing Afghanistan has to emancipated wimmin, so I'd guess she's a place-holder...
Karzai, informed sources say, chose to back Sayyaf over Rabbani after US prodding.
My guess would be that's the Soddies, working through tame undersecretaries in our State Department. Being generous, we'll say they don't know any better. It's for sure they weren't paying any attention in the 80s, assuming they were around then.
He must find a way of circumventing Abdul Sayyaf's war crimes record, projecting the Paghman chief's Pashtun credentials. Karzai will draw on support from "Pashtuns, independents, democratic intellectuals, women, former communists and Taliban", said analyst Neik Mohammad Kabuli of the National Democratic Institute (NDI) in Kabul. Analysts say the Abdul Sayyaf versus Qanooni contest pits Pashtuns, who make up 50 per cent of the population, against a coalition of minorities.
Who make up the other, more savory, 50 percent.
Posted by:Fred

#8  :>
Posted by: Leon Clavin   2005-12-21 17:55  

#7  Arabic lessons:
Ab-dul = short form of slave of god

rasul = short form of messenger of god

sayyaf = sword

Abdul Rasul Sayyaf = Shit head
Posted by: CaziFarkus   2005-12-21 17:08  

#6  Liberalhawk

A moderate wahabi is a contradiction. And wahabis are unwinnable. Now for a time after 9/11 I spent time reading traffic in Pashtoon websites and there are a number of Pahtuns who are nationalistic and see chariah as submission to Arabs (and theùm but also a good number of the "religious" Pashtoons see Arabs with contempt). These are the winnable Pashtoons not the Wahabis.

BTW it was through the wahabist Abou Sayaf who extended safe-conducts to the two Al Quaida who killed Massood. He swears, he was not their accomplice, only duped by them. Oh, and the Hazara have a blood feud with him.
Posted by: JFM   2005-12-21 14:25  

#5  #1: Watch out for 'necks with shotguns in pickup trucks.

You called?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2005-12-21 14:11  

#4  What LH said. Past a certain point it's important to remember that 50+% of democracy is deal cutting.
Posted by: Secret Master   2005-12-21 14:05  

#3  We need to win over Pashtuns, esp moderate Wahabis

Is this a sub-set of the Mod Moslems?
Posted by: Buckminster Spemble1220   2005-12-21 14:02  

#2  The spin Im sure State would use would go as follows. We need to win over Pashtuns, esp moderate Wahabis, to undermine the continuing Taliban insurgency. Thats why we support Sayyaf, and that is why someone like Mohaqiq, whose people were subject to genocide by the Taliban, would take the same position. And its not like Qanooni is clean of religious extremists - Rabbani is pretty fundie himself - hes just been more firmly anti-Taliban cause he Tajik.

Alternatively, its just that this is the best deal we've managed to strike, and the actual deals and counter deals are SO complex it isnt possible to explain them on either ethnic or ideological terms.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-12-21 10:48  

#1  Watch out for 'necks with shotguns in pickup trucks.
Posted by: Buckminster Spemble1220   2005-12-21 09:08  

00:00