You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Bolton Scores U.N. on Stance Toward Israel
2006-01-14
UNITED NATIONS - The American ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, upped the ante in an escalating confrontation between America and Turtle Bay on the issue of Israel's place at the world body. In a sharply worded letter to Secretary-General Annan, Mr. Bolton threatened to cut funding to the United Nations if it continues to promote anti-Israel events.

Mr. Bolton's January 3 letter, which was seen yesterday by The New York Sun, is a response to a November 29 event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People." At the event, which was attended by Mr. Annan and other top diplomats, a map that "erases the state of Israel," as Mr. Bolton wrote, was displayed.

"Given that we now have a world leader pursuing nuclear weapons who is calling for the state of Israel to be wiped off the map, the issue has even greater salience," Mr. Bolton wrote.

A photo of Mr. Annan standing below the map - several days after President Ahmadinejad of Iran made his statement - was carried last month on the Web site eyeontheun.org, creating a storm of criticism. The site also highlighted the seven-figure budget of U.N. bodies dedicated to promoting what Israel and America consider one-sided, anti-Israel propaganda in the guise of solidarity with Palestinian Arabs.

A U.N. spokesman, Stephane Dujarric, told the Sun yesterday that Mr. Annan was "grateful" to Mr. Bolton and others who have alerted him to the map, and that he "much hopes" that the U.N. body that organized the annual event will "consider not displaying the map in the future." Mr. Dujarric stopped short of saying that Mr. Annan would cancel his participation in future events that display such maps.
'cause he's a diplobat, ya know, and he has to be polite to everyone, even genocidal thugs.
Mr. Dujarric said that Mr. Annan plans to answer Mr. Bolton, but 10 days after sending the letter, which contained very specific questions, Mr. Bolton's spokesman, Richard Grenell, yesterday said, "We have not received an answer as of yet."

"Who is the high-level official within the secretariat who approved use of the map for the event?" Mr. Bolton asked in the letter. "Does the United Nations intend to use the map in future U.N.-sponsored functions and events?"

Most ominously for the United Nations, Mr. Bolton wrote, "In light of prohibition under U.S. law to fund events such as this one, do you consider it appropriate for the United Nations to advertise and promote the event on its general Web site and other venues, which do in fact benefit from U.S. funds?"
THW-A-A-A-ACK! I think he used a #6. Don't make him use a #7.
Although America opposes funding for several U.N. bodies that one-sidedly promote Palestinian Arab rights, the threat to further cut its support for U.N. general advertising budgets is a matter of serious concern to Mr. Annan's aides, who have been under intense pressure to reform the United Nations in the wake of last year's scandals.

The Palestinian observer at the United Nations, Riad Mansour, defended the use of the map yesterday, telling the Sun that a pre-1948 date is clearly marked on it. "That map has been there for tens of years," he said, adding that in 2004, one of the participants in the event was the American ambassador at the time, John Danforth.
"We always use antiquated maps! Yasser did, and if it was good enough for him, by gum, it's good enough for us!"
Israel and America might object to funding for the pro-Palestinian Arab bodies, Mr. Mansour said, but the vast majority of member states "think they are useful" and vote annually to continue their activities.
But we don't have to fund them.
Mr. Dujarric told the Sun that since 1977 the secretariat "has been mandated by the General Assembly" to promote the "Day of Solidarity." He said in 1981, the "committee for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people" decided that the map and the flag of "Palestine as it existed in 1948" should be displayed in the room. Disregarding an official objection by Israel's then ambassador, Yehuda Blum, "the practice has remained unchanged ever since," Mr. Dujarric said.

The fact that the map has been displayed at the United Nations for such a long time and was only noticed this year "only strengthens our position," Israel's deputy ambassador, Daniel Carmon, said. "You can't have a U.N.-sponsored event that displays a map that obliterates a member-state." He added that even if the issue of the map is resolved, the central problem remains: the existence of "automatic" anti-Israel resolutions that provide funds for one-sided bodies at the secretariat.

The organizer of the "solidarity" event is the Division for Palestinian Rights, which in the 2004-2005 U.N. budget received $5,449,600. Other bodies include the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories,($254,500); the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, ($60,800), and the Information Activities on the Question of Palestine ($566,000).
This is all walking-around money for Kofi.
Similar funding has just been approved for the next biannual budget. America "strongly opposes the use of scarce U.N. resources to support the biased and one-sided political activities" of these bodies, America's deputy U.N. ambassador, Anne Patterson, said in October as the General Assembly was discussing the current budget. With the exception of America, Israel, and some small Pacific nations, the General Assembly approved their funding.
Posted by:Steve White

#14  #13: Maybe, shmaybe, my money says the UN stays corrupt unless an outside force acts upon it.

Oh shit, that was the general idea behind the United Nations in the first place, an "Overbody" that could make Nations obey.

Now you want an "Overbody" over the "Overbody"?
Then another "Overbody" to keep the "Over, Overbody" straight?

Just admit it was a very bad concept in the first place.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-01-14 20:21  

#13  Maybe, shmaybe, my money says the UN stays corrupt unless an outside force acts upon it.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-01-14 14:29  

#12  The American ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, upped the ante in an escalating confrontation between America and Turtle Bay on the issue of Israel's place at the world body. In a sharply worded letter to Secretary-General Annan, Mr. Bolton threatened to cut funding to the United Nations if it continues to promote anti-Israel events.



Bolton has really gone to work but the UN corruption investigation isn't over! There is plenty of leverage to put the squeeze on France, Russia, China, and Great Britain, besides all the other corrupt officials complicit in the scandal. Previous UN mandate acknowledges Israel's sovereign right to exist in the world body, so maybe they should give Israel a full seat on the UNSC with full veto power. Israelis have the right to defend themselves and are deserving of recognition of equal standing with any other now in existence, and which the Palestinian state in not. Palestine doesn't exist, never has, nor is it deserving. A separate Palestinian state has not earned the rights it demands for itself when they won't reciprocate. As long as condones terrorism, and is not worthy of respect. It'd give additional leverage and help keep the scumbags accountable. They also could make a mutual defense treaty with each other, so Israel would have the full backing of the entire world body in defending against the aggressor, ie. Iran, without the diplomatic maneuvering and delays. Iran would immediately be a target of complete annihilation with mutually agreed cooperation in the destruction of this chancre. Maybe this worthless organization could actually come together and accomplish something worthwhile by agreeing on a zero-tolerance policy for MM's and traitors. :)
Posted by: Danielle   2006-01-14 13:35  

#11  He just keep hitting it one piece at a time. I wonder what are his top ten hits for the next year?
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-01-14 11:55  

#10  JOE/JOHN 2008
Posted by: 6   2006-01-14 10:59  

#9  Darth, hell! To sort that bunch of scumbags out would take more work than Hercules had at the Augean stables, not to mention that the demands of honest justice would require that at least half those UN buttholes be executed. Better we remove all funding, expel them from our soil, turn the building into offices and condos, and admit that it was a good idea hijacked by liberals and criminals (those two words are too often synonymous, no?). Away with them, and the sooner the better.
Posted by: mac   2006-01-14 07:24  

#8  in 2004, one of the participants in the event was the American ambassador at the time, John Danforth.

There's a new Darth in town come to clean the place up.
Posted by: lotp   2006-01-14 07:17  

#7  That will work too. Grins
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2006-01-14 03:52  

#6  I have a 500KV stun baton, kinda like an Ebonite cattle prod with 10x the kick, but I think that's as close as you're gonna get, 3dc, heh.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-14 03:41  

#5  just carry a "light saber"
Posted by: 3dc   2006-01-14 03:37  

#4  Bolton should start wearing a pistol on his hip at all UN functions.

Nothing wrong with the UN that a big fire couldn't help.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2006-01-14 02:57  

#3  The UN is the most diseased corrupt pile of human scum ever created. I look forward, eagerly, to its demise.

Bolton should be getting hazardous duty pay - and personal apologies from all the assholes who voted against him for the job. He has more on the ball and more gumption that the entire US Senate.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-14 01:22  

#2  He needs a two-handed broadsword and should carry it to all meetings, taking heads as trophies....start with Kofi
Posted by: Frank G   2006-01-14 00:51  

#1  In a sharply worded letter to Secretary-General Annan, Mr. Bolton threatened to cut funding to the United Nations if it continues to promote anti-Israel events.

This guy is even better than I had expected.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2006-01-14 00:50  

00:00