| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Iraq | |
| Iraq needs $20 billion to rehabilitate electricity sector | |
| 2006-01-19 | |
| BAGHDAD: Iraq needs $20 billion over the next five years to solve a chronic electricity crisis after U.S. reconstruction funds failed to flick the right switches, the Iraqi electricity minister said. "When you lose electricity the country is destroyed, nothing works, all industry is down and terrorist activity is increased," Mohsen Shlash said Tuesday. Power cuts are part of daily life for millions of Iraqis who paradoxically have an ever increasing need for energy because of an influx of electronic goods, such as air conditioners, over the past three years. Total power production is lower than before the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion, at about 3,700 megawatts, because of insurgent attacks and other reconstruction problems, according to a Western diplomat with expertise in the sector. Prewar production peaked at about 4,300 megawatts - well under half of Iraq's potential capacity. The United States earmarked $4.7 billion for the neglected electricity sector in 2003, but much of the money has gone and there is little to show for it, Shlash said. The Iraqi government has a few projects under way to rebuild or replace parts of the country's dilapidated electricity infrastructure, he added. "But this is not enough. There is a big need to build more power plants and of course this needs time and money - and we lack both," Shlash said. "From this day, we need $20 billion over five years to cover the expected increase in the [electricity] load and the necessary reserves." Such funds, however, must appear quickly and go toward competitively priced projects by Iraqi firms, in contrast to much of the U.S. money, which went to U.S. primary contractors, with large overheads and huge security costs, Shlash said. "The American donation is almost finished and it was not that effective. They did a few power plants, yes, but that definitely is not worth $4.7 billion," said the minister, adding that some of the work carried out was worth just one-tenth of the money being spent.
Power in southern and northern Iraq, where most plants are based, is slightly higher than before the war, when Saddam Hussein used to divert electricity to Baghdad, the Western diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. But now the capital and much of the central regions are suffering some of their worst power shortages, with just two to six hours of electricity per day. Shlash said U.S. reconstruction money would have gone further in the hands of Iraqi contractors who charge a fairer price and carry a lower security risk. Had this happened, "by now we would have had very little power problems or maybe no power cuts at all," said Shlash. A U.S. official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington was increasingly contracting Iraqi companies for its electricity jobs. But he insisted that it had been necessary to employ large, foreign firms with experience in organizing the projects at the start. The Western diplomat, meanwhile, said progress on the U.S. reconstruction front had been slow because Washington underestimated the dire state of Iraq's electricity infrastructure and the inadequate training of its technicians. In addition, daily attacks on power stations and transmission lines further damaged the infrastructure, destroying or delaying repair work. As a result, the United States pushed back a goal to lift Iraq's power production to 6,000 megawatts from the middle of 2004 to the end of this year. Going forward, Shlash said the $20 billion needed to generate power 24 hours a day should come from Iraqi coffers or in the form of loans rather than slow-to-emerge donations from the international community. Iraq, however, is severely strapped for cash. The Electricity Ministry asked for $1.8 billion for this year's budget, but the government only approved one-third of that amount, some $650 million, said Shlash. | |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #7 Iraq needs to be stabilized and the terrorists killed. When enough of them have been killed, then they will be gone or have given up. Then you can ramp up building electricity infrastructure with Iraqi oil funds. More terrorists eliminated means the oil flow will increase, revenue will increase and rebuilding will increase. Otherwise Iraq will remain a typical ME sh*thole. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2006-01-19 21:16 |
| #6 "Does make you wonder where the rest of the money went." A retired colonel who recently spent a year over there told me we have a truly spectacular bureaucracy in place. Money is loosed slowly, and he described State people in the project as naive. I dunno: corrupt Iraqi contractors or dumb bureaucrats. Take your pick. |
| Posted by: James 2006-01-19 12:19 |
| #5 I'm so sick of the MSM's comparison of "pre-war" vs. "post-war" conditions of Iraq's infrastructure. Yeah, everything was so rosy under Saddam. It's almost as if the reporters don't get that things get blown up, torn apart, damaged and intentionally destroyed during a WAR! |
| Posted by: BA 2006-01-19 09:25 |
| #4 Amen, RJ. |
| Posted by: Jules 2 2006-01-19 09:00 |
| #3 Iraq has oil, (as we're being constantly reminded) Buy your own damn generators, then the terrorism against the power grid is your problem. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2006-01-19 08:44 |
| #2 rub the iranian noses in it by going nucleur :p long cheap shot , but hey i thought it an amusing concept :) |
| Posted by: MacNails 2006-01-19 05:58 |
| #1 From friends who have been in Iraq, there are two major problems with the electricity network. One is the incredibly rapid grouwth of the Iraqi economy and the second is the theft of power cables by some of those new Iraqi Enterpeneurs. They make very nice copper coffee sets to sell to the State Dept people and reporters! |
| Posted by: madman 2006-01-19 01:27 |