You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Bush Supports Russian Plan on Iran N-Program
2006-01-27
US President George W. Bush yesterday gave public support for a Russian plan to end the Iran nuclear dispute. Bush told a news conference he would support a civilian nuclear energy program in Iran if all the nuclear fuel was manufactured in Russia and the Russian authorities collected all the waste that could be used for nuclear weapons.

Earlier in the day, China and Iran expressed support for the Russian proposal, and both said they opposed the threat of sanctions from the UN Security Council. Top Iranian nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, on a one-day trip to Beijing seeking China’s support, said the Russian proposal — that uranium be enriched on Russian soil — needed further discussion. “The Russian suggestion is a useful one, but needs to be discussed further,” Ali Larijani told a news conference in Beijing. He told Reuters later that Iran was willing to show flexibility on the issue, but rejected the “language of force,” an apparent reference to the threat of sanctions.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Check off the box.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-27 19:53  

#10  Of course, this puts Putin squarely on record as bearing responsibility for the outcome ....

However nice it would be to see RaPutin's mammary gland pinched in the Bendix, all of his previous dealings heretofore have greatly sucked the mighty wind. Russia's trustworthiness rates a bare few microns in front of Iran's.

It is difficult to resist the notion that overtly hostile entities like Iran should merely be prohibited from possessing any nuclear technology whatsoever. Attempts to acquire same should be met with strategic or economic blockades.

Too many other disreputable governments will be following Iran's lead for there to be any sort of uncertain or inconsistent diplomatic policy regarding this. We must set the standard for the numerous other similar confrontations that will follow this one.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-01-27 16:48  

#9  yah and the mullahs just need to discuss it for another year or so.... can anyone tell me the Pharsi for "fait accompli"?
Posted by: Sping Crinemble1145   2006-01-27 14:01  

#8  Even if the mullahs agreed to this, what are the guarantees that over time material wouldn't be skimmed from the stuff sent back? Pinch a little here, pinch a little there.....as long as the amount is within the typical range of MUF, no one would be likely to notice.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2006-01-27 10:12  

#7  Of course, this puts Putin squarely on record as bearing responsibility for the outcome ....
Posted by: lotp   2006-01-27 09:51  

#6  In fact why am i even concidering Iran having the options anyway .. sheesh /selfsmack

Back to the drawing board
Posted by: MacNails   2006-01-27 09:33  

#5  hmm all the professionalism the Russians have showed with nuclear fuels and power plants , I aint sure I want them doing this .

How about UK or USA do the supplying ? :p
Posted by: MacNails   2006-01-27 09:32  

#4  I suspect the Iraniacks will agree to it in the end, but pursue a duel program of development; one allied with the Sov's and another clandestine program at home. This would buy them some time, good press, and provide suitable cover for status as "legitimate" peaceful use developers.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-01-27 09:28  

#3  No! Screw that, let's bomb em!
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-01-27 08:42  

#2  of course, maybe we just want a little more time too :-)
Posted by: 2b   2006-01-27 01:19  

#1  This makes the U.S. look good in the world. We look reasonable and the plan is a good comprimise. But we all know Iran is never going to agree to the Russian plan in the end. They probably just want more time to stallllll (continue enriching Uranium) in talks...
Posted by: bgrebel9   2006-01-27 01:02  

00:00