You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Peggy Noonan on Flight 93
2006-02-02
Wall Street Journal, excerpted from a longer column

On the subject of political passion Tom Shales, longtime TV critic of the Washington Post and possessor of occasional eloquence, wrote a piece this week that deserves comment. I don't mean his State of the Union review, which began, "George Bush may or may not be the worst president since Herbert Hoover . . ." I mean his attack last Monday on "Flight 93," the A&E television movie on that fated 9/11 flight. Mr. Shales said it was shameful that vulgar dramatizers would "exploit" the pain of those on the flight and those they left behind. Or as he put it, he had, innocent that he is, thought it "unthinkable" that "even the sleaziest producers" would "exploit any aspect of a nightmare that the nation had witnessed in horror."
By exploit I think he means "remember." There is nothing vulgar, low or unhelpful about remembering the particular heroism of Todd Beamer, Jeremy Glick and dozens of others. Their action--they stormed the cockpit that day, forced the plane down and kept it from hitting a Washington target, presumably the Capitol or the White House--was a moment of courage and sacrifice, and we all owe them a great deal. Imagine if the particular wound the hijackers meant to inflict had been successful that day. Imagine how much worse it would have been,

Remembering the men and women of Flight 93 isn't a self-indulgence but a duty. One senses in the Shales review the sneaky little suggestion that those who would remember, and who would tell this story (based by the way on the surviving telephone and other harrowing tapes of that flight) are in fact being political. But one suspects it is Mr. Shales who is being political. Maybe he fears those stupid Americans will get all emotional if they revisit part of the horror of that day, and go out and do something bad. Let's not speak of it lest the rabble be roused.

What a snob.

You wonder at the intemperance of angry young lefties and then think of the example set for them by exhausted old lefties.

I watched the A&E movie Monday, and it was good . . . consistent with the historical record, respectful of the people on the plane, and more than a little uncomfortably remindful of what 9/11 was and what we're fighting for. (Also perhaps a little too Oprah in spots, but that's A&E for you.) There's also this one in production for theatrical release in April, which looks like it's also being done right. (The trailer'll give you goosebumps.)

I can see why someone like Shales would dislike it . . . it interferes with maintaining the September 10 mindset which is the foundation of the whole liberal elite edifice.
Posted by:Mike

#3  Wasn't able to see the movie, but anyone think it was as good as this column by Dave Barry?
Posted by: Whutch Threth6418   2006-02-02 20:22  

#2  Mr. Shales said it was shameful that vulgar dramatizers would "exploit" the pain of those on the flight and those they left behind. Or as he put it, he had, innocent that he is, thought it "unthinkable" that "even the sleaziest producers" would "exploit any aspect of a nightmare that the nation had witnessed in horror."

Why don't you talk a walk down the hall to the Post cartoonist's office, Tom, and run your little speech by them? They'll probably have a good chuckle over it...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-02-02 13:57  

#1  You wonder at the intemperance of angry young lefties and then think of the example set for them by exhausted old lefties.

Tom Shales: Member in good standing with the non traditional patriot krowd.

ie. treasonus bastards.


Posted by: RD   2006-02-02 13:51  

00:00