You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Maoist ambush kills Nepalese soldiers
2006-02-28
Dozens of Maoist rebels have ambushed an Army patrol in eastern Nepal and shot dead at least three soldiers, an Army officer says. The officer says one civilian has also been killed in the incident at Kavre district, 80 kilometres east of the capital Kathmandu. He had earlier said the civilian died in cross-fire.

In a separate attack in Pokhara, 200 kilometres west of Kathmandu, 11 civilians have been wounded after suspected rebels set off a bomb in a busy market place. Residents say the bomb went off on a footpath and the victims are pedestrians and fruit or vegetable sellers. "It was a deafening explosion," local journalist Rajendra Adhikary said. Police officer Krishna Pageni says the rebels had unsuccessfully targeted an Army truck.

There is no comment from the Maoists on the blast, the second to rock the resort town of Pokhara in two days. The attacks came a day after the Army said it had killed at least 16 rebels in the west of the country.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Maoists are not interested in multiparty rule.

They want a people's revolution - Cambodia style.

Many high ranking Nepalese maoists are apologists for the Khmer Rouge. They seek to emulate them and claim that the evidence of genocide is just western propaganda.

Of course India won't permit this. There are a few red lines here for India - overt Chinese interference or a Maoist takeover.

This probably has to burn itself out... twenty years more of bloodshed, ten-twenty-thirty thousand dead before the maoists get tired.

Posted by: john   2006-02-28 09:04  

#1  One of mine...one of your's. Two of mine...two of your's. I first saw this in the '70's and it's still going on. It's really just two party violence that could be reduced by a two-party system of governance.

Tibet is as much a sovereign satellite of China as Kashmir, or Georgia is of Russia. It's just that 'ruling with an iron hand' thing.
Posted by: Skidmark   2006-02-28 07:09  

00:00