You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Civil War Fears in Iraq Persist
2006-02-28
An edgy normality returned to Baghdad yesterday with the lifting of a curfew imposed to stem days of sectarian bloodshed but heightened fears of civil war saw families fleeing hostile neighbors and manning barricades. The Iraqi army said it was deploying some of its few tanks around the capital — a partly symbolic move given the large if discreet presence of heavily armed US forces — after a mortar attack killed four people in a Shiite district of Sunni west Baghdad.

The US ambassador, closely engaged in efforts to forge a national unity government, acknowledged Iraqis “came to the brink of civil war” after Wednesday’s suspected Al-Qaeda bombing of a Shiite shrine but said: “Things are getting better.” But the Sunni minority’s main political bloc said it was not ready to end the boycott of coalition talks which it announced in protest at reprisal attacks on Sunni mosques; police tallies indicate that over 200 people died in the five days of violence. Still fearful of sectarian reprisals, some families on both sides of Baghdad’s religious divide abandoned homes where they felt threatened by neighbors, or barricaded themselves in.

Iraq’s Defense Ministry said security forces had killed 35 “terrorists” and detained 487 since Wednesday. State television later announced the capture of a possibly Syrian aide to Al-Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi; few details were available. The ministry said it had lifted the curfew to let people go back to work. Overnight curfews remain in force across Iraq. “It was a courageous decision to impose the (daytime) curfew and lifting it was more courageous,” spokesman Maj. Gen. Abdul Aziz Mohammed told a news conference, saying the security forces had “exercised restraint” to avoid inflaming passions.
Posted by:Fred

#3  Agree with SPOT - the "insurgency" has failed to sucessfully destabilize or induce the removal of the USA from Iraq, both in Iraq and Afghanistan, and while the Samarra, etal violence has shaken the new Iraqi Govt also has NOT led to either its destruction, dissolution, or sudden calls for new elex. The insurgents are wilfully upping the ante of violence before the US Coalition and new Iraqi Govt can finish them off as an organz Iraq-based force-network once and for all. For me, SAMARRA = TET OFFENSIVE, where prohibitive local losses > foreign govts will have to take over the fight. AS WITH CHINA IN KOREA 1, AND HANOI DURING POST-TET VIETNAM, THE US-LED FORCES DESTROYED SO MUCH MANPOWER AND ASSETS AS TO PUT AT RISK/THREATEN THE ABILITY OF THE CHINESE AND LATER NORTH VIETNAMESE GOVTS TO CONTROL/HOLD ON TO THEIR OWN PARTIES AND GOVTS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-02-28 21:50  

#2  Noting the increase in shia-sunni violence and decrease in US casualties, I think something's going on and it's that Zark and Co. are losing and are shifting their tactics as a result. They can't beat the coalition, so they figure to cause enough trouble to gain traction through at least "instability", if not civil war. The MSM is too dumb to see it, so they shift from the Oh no, Quagmire! meme to the Oh no, Civil War! meme. Any excuse to bitch.
Posted by: Spot   2006-02-28 10:15  

#1  Hmmm...

Civil War Fearmongering in MSM Persists

Yeah, that's better.
Posted by: .com   2006-02-28 01:13  

00:00