You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
‘India’s success marred by social inequality’
2006-03-01
The post-1991 dismantling of IndiaÂ’s nationally regulated economy has been accompanied by a rapid growth of social inequality and economic insecurity, according to an analysis published by the World Socialist Website (WSWS).
Right. We expect unbiased and objective analysis from the World Socialist Website.
Keith Jones
... of SF.Indymedia fame...
writes that in “democratic India”, hundreds of millions of people must struggle to survive on less than a $1 per day.
They had to do the same thing under India's nationally regulated economy, too. The only difference is that then there were more of them eking out a living and the Gandhi-Nehru dynasty was living large.
Education and healthcare for all intents and purposes have been privatized, with only the “poorest of the poor using the dilapidated public education and health systems”, he wrote.
It's only by coincidence that we could stop sending CARE packages to the starving children in India about the time the managed economy was dumped.
He said that a more important objective of Bush’s trip is to harness India – through increased military, civilian nuclear, and geopolitical collaboration – to Washington’s drive for global supremacy.
India, of course, gets nothing out of the deal...
In short, the US wants to transform a “rising India” into an economic, military and geopolitical counterweight to China.
Posted by:Fred

#1  Former Singapore PM Lee Kwan Yew had an interesting comment on the fabian socialist programs in India.

He said that he admired the intent, but he recognized that to share a cake, one first has to bake it, something Indian politicians did not. They were busy redistributing poverty.

So now, there is a large middle class but that is bad because there are poor people, as if these people were not there before.



Posted by: john   2006-03-01 15:55  

00:00