You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Dubai Company to Give Up Stake in U.S. Ports Deal
2006-03-09
WASHINGTON — After Republican leaders warned President Bush that the House and Senate appeared ready to block Dubai Ports World from taking over some U.S. port terminal operations, the company said it would give up its management stake in the deal. The Thursday announcement was a blow for Democrats, who were pushing for a Senate vote on an amendment that would halt the deal. If they succeeded in that vote, Democrats could then claim a big election year win in the area of national security — an area Republicans generally have a stronger track record on.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., read a statement from DP World executives on the Senate floor Thursday, announcing the concession.

"Because of the strong relationship between the United Arab Emirates and the United States and to preserve that relationship, DP World has decided to transfer fully the U.S. operation of P&O Operations North America to a United States entity," DP World's chief operating officer, Edward H. Bilkey, said in the statement.


With the latest DP World news, many members of Congress who thus far have been critical of the deal may be much more positive toward it. Because the GOP-led House Appropriations Committee passed a bill blocking the deal on Wednesday, Democrats were scrambling to get a similar bill passed in the Senate by attaching it to a lobby reform bill. Bush has vowed to veto any measure halting the deal.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - State-owned Arab company Dubai Ports World confirmed on Thursday an announcement by U.S. Sen. John Warner that it would transfer operation of U.S. ports it has acquired from the British company P & O.

"Sen. Warner has made our statement for us. His announcements says everything we have to say at this point," a spokesman said.
"We can say no more"
Posted by:Steve

#10  like you'd know? I saw your dribble earlier.

"Feeeeeelings! nothing more than feeeeelings!"
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-09 23:42  

#9  
This is a good thing!
Posted by: Nana   2006-03-09 23:40  

#8  Likely Mr. Clinton went in knowing there were very good odds that the initial deal would blow up.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-03-09 18:42  

#7  Slick Willie could be a big loser. He was supposedly an advisor to DPW. Some advice. On the other foot, guys like him do seem to land on their feet. Maybe he'll start endorsing rigged elections like Jimmah.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-09 16:40  

#6  Slick Willie's Big Boat Loadin and Unloadin Company.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-03-09 16:39  

#5  I wonder where Slick Wille fits in to this. He is heavily involved in "advising" the UAE on this, for a fee of course, so it wouldn't surprise me if he comes out as one of the principles in the "United States Entity".
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2006-03-09 16:36  

#4  The donks can and are expected to be fools on defense. The limp wristed Reps who lined up behind them are disgusting.

Ever fighr a war when you give away your strategic advantages? We are (Iraq/Afganistan)and will (Iran).
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-09 16:25  

#3  From Mark Levin at NRO

"Reid is demanding a vote on a deal that no longer exists and Schumer is insisting on seeing the details of the now defunct deal. It's not easy being a weak-on-defense liberal."
Posted by: Sherry   2006-03-09 15:29  

#2  Are those heads I hear popping?
Posted by: mojo   2006-03-09 14:58  

#1  .... and enter Hallibuton!
Posted by: Sherry   2006-03-09 14:25  

00:00