You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Troops border deployment helped catch illegal aliens
2006-03-28
The deployment of federal troops along the U.S.-Mexico border in October netted a 60 percent increase in apprehensions of illegal aliens by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents, a congressional report says. The report given this month to the Senate Armed Services Committee says a Texas-based Stryker-armored reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition squadron helped CBP agents capture 2,000 illegal border crossers in New Mexico and Arizona.
You mean guarding the border really works?
The squadron, part of Joint Task Force North (JTF-N), based at Biggs Army Airfield in Fort Bliss, Texas, was used to "detect and report" the movement of "transnational threats" to the U.S. Border Patrol during the 30-day Operation Western Vigilance.
"Transnational Threats" is such a ugly term. I'm sure he meant to say "pre-legal migrants".
Adm. Timothy J. Keating, commander of the U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) and the North American Aerospace Defense Command, told the committee that the operation also detected three tunnels at the U.S.-Mexico border and one from Canada. "Our homeland defense and civil support plans are the foundation of our ability to deter, prevent and defeat threats to our nation and assist civil authorities when called upon by the president or secretary of defense," Adm. Keating said. JTF-N, a joint service command of active duty and reserve soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Defense Department civilian employees, is a part of NORTHCOM, which is headquartered in Colorado Springs and monitors air, land and sea approaches and encompasses the entire North American continent. The unclassified report noted that unmanned aerial systems and National Guard helicopters were used in addition to the squadron's combat vehicles.

Adm. Keating said NORTHCOM initiated coordination with multiple federal agencies for further development of tunnel detection technology, which will benefit not only JTF-N and its law-enforcement agency partners, but also U.S. Central Command in Southwest Asia. NORTHCOM is engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to develop airspace procedures for unmanned aerial system support to border control lead agencies and disaster response operations, he said.

Stryker squadrons like the one used in Operation Western Vigilance consist of combat vehicles that combine the capacity for rapid deployment with survivability and tactical mobility. They enable combat teams to maneuver in close and urban areas, provide protection in open terrain and transport infantry quickly to critical positions.
Posted by:Steve

#12  SS.. We are absolutely addicted to it and our economy is totally dependent upon it.

thats a lie.

Can we stop immigration without causing serious damage to the economy?

you got that backasswards SS, illegal immigration is causing tremendous damage to the econmy.

Not to mention the respect for our laws, national security, flood of illegal drugs, voting rights, phony ID rackets, or the corrosive nature of a massive invasion of non-citizens on our body politic.
Posted by: RD   2006-03-28 22:10  

#11  Face it, the citizens of this country have no choice when it comes to accepting illegal immigration. We are absolutely addicted to it and our economy is totally dependent upon it. Business loves the cheap labor, the housing industry loves the increased demand for housing, the retail industy peddles all kinds of goodies to immigrants, policticians salivate over all the campaign contributions from business and votes from immigrant groups. The US is about the only western country that has a positive nonmuslim population growth rate (thanks to immigrants).

I do wonder what will happen if we have a huge recession or the dollar collapses. Will the immigrants merely be marching on Washington if they aren't getting paid, or will they riot (like in LA after R. King)?

Do we want to continue to add people until we have a population the size of India's? Can we stop immigration without causing serious damage to the economy?
Posted by: Slotle Sloluck9318   2006-03-28 21:49  

#10  Thanks for helping keep us safe, Just About Enough. We here appreciate you. :-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-28 21:33  

#9  From 1990 to 1995 I was the TF Commander for the deployment of Active Duty National Guard Troops on the U.S. Mexico Border to conduct counterdrug missions. We supported the US Customs Service at the Ports of Entry doing secondary cargo inspections, and deployed up to ten four-man LP/OP teams conducting clandestine surveillance of trafficking routes to alert the US BP to crossings. We used aircraft and FLIR, and used NVGs and optics to enhance our ability to surveil in stand-off positions. In the latter stages of the operations we were conducted mounted overt patrolling in remote desert areas of the border, as well as overt and clandestine radar surveillance. After five years and literally hundreds of support missions, I can claim a fair understanding of the effect of troops in the border! It works extremely well, especially in a mix of overt and covert operations. The blather that it doesn't comes from people who either have no direct experience, or who have a motive that prefers political expedience to protecting national security.
Posted by: Just About Enough!   2006-03-28 20:30  

#8  If this works so well..surprise, surprise..why are we expanding the effort ? This is exactly why Bliss was put there more than 100 years ago. To control the border with Army troops. Let's get back to it. We know it works well.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-03-28 19:48  

#7  I'm guessing that Canadian tunnel was for Hollywood types exiting the fascist state created by Chimpy McHitlerburton.
Posted by: Scott R   2006-03-28 17:51  

#6  Worth the watch..

Lou Dobbs vs. idiot, illegal immigration
Posted by: RD   2006-03-28 17:42  

#5  bout dang time.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-03-28 17:23  

#4  Good. Do it more, please.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-28 17:15  

#3  cost less than the hospital emergency room costs they bring now. Oh, and that drug-resistant TB, no fun to catch
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-28 17:00  

#2  It would cost a lot of dinero and we'd catch a few more.
Posted by: Hank   2006-03-28 16:40  

#1  I wonder what would happen if we built a wall?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-28 16:38  

00:00